This article discusses the strategic scaling up of evidence-based practices. The authors draw from the scholarly work of fellow special education researchers and from the field of learning sciences. The article defines scaling up as the process by which researchers or educators initially implement interventions on a small scale, validate them, and then implement them more widely in real-world conditions. Examples of scale-up research are included. The authors discuss challenges to scaling up and sustaining evidence-based practices, followed by factors that can potentially support scaling up, including professional development and district leadership. A case example describes how these issues can play out by highlighting experiences with a Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) scale-up research project in a large urban school district. The article concludes by offering recommendations for research, policy, and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottM., GreenwoodC. R., BuzhardtJ., & TapiaY. (2006). Using technology-based teacher support tools to scale up the ClassWide peer tutoring program. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22, 47–64.
2.
American Guidance Service, Inc. (2001). Group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
3.
BaconA., WalkerH. M., SchwartzA. A., O'Hara, D. M., CalkinsC., & WehmeyerM. L. (2011). Lessons learned in scaling up effective practices: Implications for promoting self-determination within developmental disabilities. Exceptionality, 19(1), 46–60.
4.
BardachE. (2000). Practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving.New York, NY: Chatham House.
5.
BirkelandS., Murphy-GrahamE., & WeissC. (2005). Good reasons for ignoring good evaluation: The case of the drug abuse resistance education (D.A.R.E.) program. Evaluation and Program Planning 28, 247–256.
6.
BirmanB. F., DesimoneL., PorterA. C., & GaretM. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 1–8.
7.
BoardmanA. G., ArgüellesM. E., VaughnS., HughesM., & KlingnerJ. K. (2005). Special education teachers’ views of research based practices. Journal of Special Education, 39, 168–180.
8.
BorkoH., KoellnerK., & JacobsJ. (2011). Meeting the challenges of scale: The importance of preparing professional development leaders. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
9.
BrykA. S. (2009). Support a science of performance improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 597–600.
10.
BuzhardtJ., GreenwoodC. R., AbbottM., & TapiaY. (2006). Research on scaling up evidence-based instructional practice: Developing a sensitive measure of the rate of implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 467–492.
11.
ChardD. J. (2004). Toward a science of professional development in early reading instruction. Exceptionality, 12, 175–191.
12.
CobbP., & McClainK. (2001). An approach for supporting teachers’ learning in social context. In LinF. L. & ConneyT. (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 207–232). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
13.
CobbP., & SmithT. (2008). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districts as learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. In & WoodT., JaworskiB., KrainerK., SullivanP., & TiroshD. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 231–254). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
14.
CobbP., ZhaoQ., & DeanC. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: A reflection from the field. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 165–199.
15.
CoburnC. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.
16.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 3–12.
17.
CoburnC. E., & SteinM. K. (2010). Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
CoburnC. E., & TalbertJ. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence-based practice in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112, 469–495.
19.
CoburnC. E., ToureJ., & YamashitaM. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record, 111, 1115–1161.
20.
CohenD. K., & BallD. L. (2007). Educational innovation and the problem of scale. In SchneiderB. & McDonaldS. K. (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle (Vol. 1, pp. 19–36). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
CunninghamP. M., & CunninghamJ. W. (1992). Making words: Enhancing the invented spelling-decoding connection. The Reading Teacher, 4, 106–115.
22.
Denver Public Schools. (2010). Collaborative Strategic Reading Colorado United States Department of Education Investment in Innovation (i3) Grant Application.Denver, CO: Denver Public Schools.
23.
DesimoneL., PorterA. C., GaretM., YoonK. S., & BirmanB. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112.
24.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.
ElmoreR. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1–26.
27.
ElmoreR. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
28.
FixsenD. L., & BlaséK. A. (2009). Technical assistance in special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 62–64.
29.
FogelmanJ., FishmanB., & KrajcikJ. (2006). Sustaining innovations through lead teacher learning: A learning sciences perspective on supporting professional development. Teaching Education, 17, 181–194.
30.
FuchsD., McMasterK. L., SaenzL., KearnsD., FuchsL. S., YenL., … & SchatschneiderC. (2010, June). Scaling up PALS: A comparison of top down versus bottom up approaches.Poster presented at the IES Research Conference, Washington, DC.
31.
GaretM., PorterA., DesimoneL., BirmanB., & YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
32.
GatesA. I., & MacGinitieW. H. (2000). GatesMacGinitie reading tests(4th ed.). Boston, MA: Riverside.
33.
GerstenR., ChardD., & BakerS. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445–457.
34.
GerstenR., DiminoJ., JayanthiM., KimJ., & SantoroL. (2010). Impact of teacher study groups on reading instruction and student outcomes in first grade. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 694–739.
35.
GreenwoodC. R., & AbbottM. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276–289.
36.
GreenwoodC. R., DelquadriJ., & BulgrenJ. (1993). Current challenges to behavioral technology in the reform of schooling: Large-scale high-quality implementation and sustained use of effective educational practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 401–440.
37.
HitchcockJ., DiminoJ., KurkiA., WilkinsC., & GerstenR. (2011). The impact of collaborative strategic reading on the reading comprehension of grade 5 students in linguistically diverse schools: Final report.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
38.
HornerR. H., SugaiG., SmolkowskiK., EberL., NakasatoJ., ToddA.W., & EsperanzaJ. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144.
Institute for Education Sciences. (2011). Request for grant applications: Special education research grants. Retrieved from: http://ies.ed.gov/funding/
41.
Institute for Education Sciences. (2012). Request for grant applications: Special education research grants. Retrieved from: http://ies.ed.gov/funding/
42.
JabbraJ., & DwivediO. (2004). Globalization, governance, and administrative culture. International Journal of Public Administration, 27, 1101–1127.
43.
JohnsonP. E., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2010). Linking the central office and its schools for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 738–775.
44.
KearnsD. M., FuchsD., McMasterK. L., SaenzL., FuchsL. S., YenL., … SmithT. M. (2010). Factors contributing to teachers’ sustained use of kindergarten peer-assisted learning strategies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 315–342.
45.
KlingnerJ. K. (2004). The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 248–255.
46.
KlingnerJ. K., AhweeS., PilonietaP., & MenendezR. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411–429.
47.
KlingnerJ. K., & BoardmanA. G. (2011). Addressing the “research gap” in special education through mixed methods. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 208–218.
48.
KlingnerJ. K., CramerE., & HarryB. (2006). Challenges in the implementation of success for all by four urban schools. Elementary School Journal, 106, 333–349.
49.
KlingnerJ. K., VaughnS., ArgüellesM. E., HughesM. T., & AhweeS. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: “Real world” lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291–302.
50.
KlingnerJ. K., VaughnS., & SchummJ. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–21
51.
KretlowA. G., & BartholomewC. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279–299.
52.
LemonsC., FuchsD., & FuchsL. S. (2008). Evidence of kindergarten children's improved reading performance across 9 years in an urban school district: Implications for intervention research and educational policy.Poster presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
53.
LevinB. (2010). Leadership for evidence-informed education. School Leadership and Management, 30, 303–315.
54.
MathesP. G., FuchsD., FuchsL. S., HenleyA. M., & SandersA. (1994). Increasing strategic reading practices with Peabody classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 233–243.
McGill-FranzenA. (2005). In the press to scale-up, what is at risk?Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 366–370.
57.
McintoshK., FilterK. J., BennettJ. L., RyanC., & SugaiG. (2010). Principles of sustainable prevention: Designing scale up of school wide positive behavior support to promote durable systems. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 5–21.
58.
McintoshK., HornerR. H., & SugaiG. (2008). Sustainability of systems-level evidence-based practices in schools: Current knowledge and future directions. In & SailorW., DunlapG., HornerR. H., & SugaiG. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 327–352). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59.
McLaughlinM. W., & MitraD. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper and going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 301–323.
60.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(1), 53–61.
61.
ParkV., & DatnowA. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: district and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School Leadership and Management, 29, 477–494.
62.
PenuelW. R., FishmanB. J., ChengB. H., & SabelliN. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337.
63.
PiantaR. C., MashburnA. J., DownerJ. T., HamreB. K., & JusticeL. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher-child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 431–451.
64.
PressleyM., & El-DinaryP. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension-strategies instruction research into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 486–488.
65.
RorrerA. K., SkrlaL., & ScheurichJ. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 307–358.
66.
SandersM. (2009). Collaborating for change: How an urban school district and a community-based organization support and sustain school, family, and community partnerships. Teachers College Record, 111, 1693–1712.
SpillaneJ. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69, 143–150.
69.
SugaiG., HornerR. H., & McintoshK. (2008). Best practices in developing a broad-scale system of support for school-wide positive behavior support. In ThomasA. & GrimesJ. P. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 765–780). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
70.
TorgesenJ. K., & BryantB. (1994). Phonological awareness training for reading.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
71.
UrdegarS. (2000). Evaluation of the success for all program: 1998–1999.Miami, FL: Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Office of Evaluation and Research.
72.
VaughnS., & ColemanM. (2004). The role of mentoring in promoting use of research-based practices in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 25–38.
VaughnS., KlingnerJ. K., SwansonE. A., BoardmanA. G., RobertsG., MohammedS. S., & Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–964.
