Efficacy and Social Validity of Peer Support Arrangements for Adolescents with Disabilities

Abstract

Current research and policy emphasize providing students with severe disabilities with the supports needed to participate socially and academically within inclusive classrooms. The authors examined the efficacy and acceptability of peer support arrangements as an avenue for promoting the participation of 3 students with severe disabilities in high school general education classrooms. In addition, they examined the specific supports students received from their peers and individually assigned paraprofessionals throughout the semester. Increases in peer interaction were evident for all students and peer partners were able to provide an array of academic- and social-related supports to their classmates with severe disabilities without concurrent decreases in academic engagement. The article offers recommendations for further refining and strengthening peer support interventions through future research and practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Wehmeyer

Cavin

Palmer

(2010). Promoting academic engagement in the general education classroom and access to the general education curriculum for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 163–174.

Brown

Branston

M. B.

Hamre-Nietupski

Johnson

Wilcox

Gruenewald

(1979). A rationale for comprehensive longitudinal interactions between severely handicapped students and nonhandicapped students and other citizens. The American Association for the Education of the Severely/Profoundly Handicapped Review, 4, 3–14.

Brownell

(2000). Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test, fourth edition. Austin, TX: Pearson.

Carter

E. W.

Cushing

L. S.

Clark

N. M.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 1, 15–25. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.1.15.

Carter

E. W.

Cushing

L. S.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2009). Peer support strategies for improving all students' social lives and learning. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Carter

E. W.

Hughes

Copeland

S. R.

Breen

(2001). Differences between high school students who do and do not volunteer to participate in peer interaction programs. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 229–239. doi:10.2511/rpsd.26.4.229.

Carter

E. W.

Hughes

Guth

C. B.

Copeland

S. R.

(2005). Factors influencing social interaction among high school students with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 366–377. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[366:FISIAH]2.0.CO;2.

Carter

E. W.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2006). Promoting access to the general curriculum using peer support strategies. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 284–292. doi:10.2511/rpsd.31.4.284.

Carter

E. W.

Pesko

M. J.

(2008). Social validity of peer interaction intervention strategies in high school classrooms: Effectiveness, feasibility, and actual use. Exceptionality, 16, 156–173. doi:10.1080/09362830802198427.

10.

Carter

E. W.

Sisco

L. G.

Brown

Brickham

Al-Khabbaz

Z. A.

(2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479–494. doi:10.1352/2008.113:479-494.

11.

Carter

E. W.

Sisco

L. G.

Chung

Stanton-Chapman

(2010). Peer interactions of students with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A map of the intervention literature. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 35, 63–79.

12.

Carter

E. W.

Sisco

L. G.

Melekoglu

M. A.

Kurkowski

(2007). Peer supports as an alternative to individually assigned paraprofessionals in inclusive high school classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 213–227. doi:10.2511/rpsd.32.4.213.

13.

Causton-Theoharis

J. N.

Malmgren

K. W.

(2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71, 431–444.

14.

Chan

J. M.

Lang

Rispoli

O'Reilly

Sigafoos

Cole

(2009). Use of peer-mediated interventions in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 876–889. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2009.04.003.

15.

Copeland

S. R.

Cosbey

(2008/2009). Making progress in the general curriculum: Rethinking effective instructional practices. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33, 214–227. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.214.

16.

Copeland

S. R.

Hughes

Carter

E. W.

Guth

Presley

Williams

C. R.

Fowler

S. E.

(2004). Increasing access to general education: Perspectives of participants in a high school peer support program. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 342–352. doi:10.1177/07419325040250060201.

17.

Copeland

S. R.

McCall

Williams

C. R.

Guth

Carter

E. W.

Fowler

S. E.

Hughes

(2002). High school peer buddies: A win—win situation. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(1), 16–21.

18.

Cushing

L. S.

Clark

N. M.

Carter

E. W.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2005). Access to the general education curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(2), 6–13.

19.

Cushing

L. S.

Kennedy

C. H.

(1997). Academic effects of providing peer support in general education classrooms on students without disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 139–151. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-139.

20.

Cushing

L. S.

Kennedy

C. H.

Shukla

Davis

Meyer

K. A.

(1997). Disentangling the effects of curricular revision and social grouping within cooperative learning arrangements. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 231–240. doi:10.1177/108835769701200405.

21.

Dunn

L. M.

Dunn

D. M.

(2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

22.

Gast

D. L.

(2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.

23.

Giangreco

M. F.

(2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 1–13. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1.

24.

Halle

J. W.

Dymond

S. K.

(2008/2009). Inclusive education: A necessary prerequisite to accessing the general curriculum? Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33, 196–198. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.196.

25.

Hughes

Rung

L. L.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Agran

Copeland

S. R.

Hwang

(2000). Self-prompted communication book use to increase social interaction among high school students. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 153–166. doi:10.2511/rpsd.25.3.153.

26.

Jackson

L. B.

Ryndak

D. L.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2008/2009). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33/34, 175–195. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.175.

27.

Jameson

J. M.

McDonnell

Polychronis

Riesen

(2008). Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 346–363. doi:10.1352/2008.46:346-363.

28.

Johnson

D. W.

Johnson

R. T.

(2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365–379. doi:10.3102/0013189X09339057.

29.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2001). Social interaction interventions for youth with severe disabilities should emphasize interdependence. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 122–127. doi:10.1002/mrdd.1017.

30.

Kennedy

C. H.

Itkonen

(1994). Some effects of regular class participation on the social contacts and social networks of high school students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19, 1–10.

31.

Kennedy

C. H.

Shukla

Fryxell

(1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 31–47.

32.

Kishi

G. S.

Meyer

L. H.

(1994). What children report and remember: A six-year follow up of the effects of social contact between peers with and without disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19, 277–289.

33.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Scruggs

T. E.

(2001). Promoting inclusion in secondary classrooms. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24, 265–274. doi:10.2307/1511115.

34.

Rubin

K. H.

Bukowski

W. M.

Laursen

(Eds.). (2009). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

35.

Ryndak

D. L.

Billingsley

F. F.

(2004). Access to the general education curriculum. In Kennedy

C. H.

Horn

E. H.

(Eds.), Including students with severe disabilities (pp. 33–53). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

36.

Ryndak

D. L.

Moore

M. A.

Orlando

A. M.

Delano

(2008/2009). Access to the general curriculum: The mandate and role of context in research-based practice for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33/34, 199–213. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.199.

37.

Semel

Wiig

E. H.

Secord

W. A.

(2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals, fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

38.

Shukla

Kennedy

C. H.

Cushing

L. S.

(1998). Adult influence on the participation of peers without disabilities in peer support programs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 397–413. doi:10.1023/A:1022801215119.

39.

Shukla

Kennedy

C. H.

Cushing

L. S.

(1999). Intermediate school students with severe disabilities: Supporting their social participation in general education classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 130–140. doi:10.1177/109830079900100301.

40.

Siperstein

G. N.

Parker

R. C.

Bardon

J. N.

Widaman

K. F.

(2007). A national study of youth attitudes toward the inclusion of students with intellectual disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 435–455.

41.

Snell

M. E.

(2008/2009). Rethinking effective instructional practices: A response to Copeland and Cosbey. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33/34, 228–231. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.4.228.

42.

Snell

M. E.

Brady

McLean

Ogletree

B. T.

Siegel

Sylvester

Sevcik

(2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364.

43.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). 28th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2006. Washington, DC: Author.

44.

Wang

Spillane

(2009). Evidence-based social skills interventions for children with autism: A meta-analysis. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 318–342.