This study examined the self-determination of adolescents with emotional disturbance (ED) and learning disabilities (LD) from the perspectives of special educators, parents, and the students themselves. Differences in self-determination ratings were associated with both disability group and respondent. Specifically, adolescents with ED were found to have lower ratings of self-determination than students with LD, with the most pronounced differences evident from the teacher perspective. Furthermore, students with ED identified infrequent opportunities at school and home for engaging in self-determined behavior, whereas educators and parents differed in their assessments of opportunities in each setting. Implications regarding increasing the self-determination skills and opportunities of adolescents with disabilities are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgranM.SnowK.SwanerJ. (1999). Teacher perceptions of self-determination: Benefits, characteristics, and strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 293–301.
2.
AlgozzineB.BrowderD.KarvonenM.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.
3.
AndersonJ. A.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J. (2001). A comparison of the academic progress of students with E/BD and students with LD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 106–115.
4.
BenzM. R.LindstromL.YovanoffP. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.
5.
CarlsonE.BrauenM.KleinS.SchrollK.WestatS. W. (2002). Study of personnel needs in special education: Key findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
6.
CarterE. W.LunsfordL. B. (2005). Meaningful work: Preparing transition-age youth with emotional and behavioral disorders for employment. Preventing School Failure, 49 (2), 63–69.
7.
CarterE. W.WehbyJ. H. (2003). Job performance of transition-age youth with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 69, 449–465.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
CookJ. A.JonikasJ. A. (2002). Self-determination among mental health consumers/survivors. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 13, 87–95.
10.
Council for Exceptional Children (2003). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed). Arlington, VA: Author.
11.
CullinanD.SabornieE. J. (2004). Characteristics of emotional disturbance in middle and high school students. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 157–167.
12.
EisenmanL. T.ChamberlinM. (2001). Implementing self-determination activities: Lessons from schools. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 138–147.
13.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (1996). Steps to self-determination: A curriculum to help adolescents learn to achieve their goals. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
14.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (2002). Preparing youth to exercise self-determination: Quality indicators of school environments that promote the acquisition of knowledge, skills, and beliefs related to self-determination. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 13, 113–118.
15.
FieldS.SarverM. D.ShawS. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349.
16.
FieldS. S.MartinJ. E.MillerR. J.WardM.WehmeyerM. L. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the Division on Career Development and Transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 113–128.
17.
GeenenS.PowersL.Lopez-VasquezA.BersaniH. (2003). Understanding and promoting the transition of minority adolescents. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 27–46.
18.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
19.
GreshamF. M.LaneK. L.MacMillanD. L.BocianK. M.WardS. L. (2000). Effects of positive and negative illusory biases: Comparisons across social and academic self-concept domains. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 151–175.
20.
GrigalM.NeubertD. A.MoonM. S.GrahamS. (2003). Self-determination for students with disabilities: Views of parents and teachers. Exceptional Children, 70, 97–112.
21.
HalpernA. S.HerrC. M.WolfN. K.DorenB.JohnsonM. D.LawsonJ. D. (1997). Next S.T.E.P.: Student transition & educational planning. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
22.
HouchinsD. E. (2002). Self-determination knowledge instruction and incarcerated students. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 7, 132–151.
23.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Pub. L. No. 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
24.
IzzoM. V.LambP. (2003). Developing self-determination through career development activities: Implications for vocational rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 71–78.
KorteringL. J.BrazielP. M.TompkinsJ. R. (2002). The challenge of school completion among youths with behavioral disorders: Another side of the story. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 142–154.
27.
LaneK. L.CarterE. W.PiersonM.GlaeserB. (in press). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbance and learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
28.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
MalianI.NevinA. (2002). A review of self-determination literature: Implications for practitioners. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 68–74.
MartinJ. E.MithaugD. E.CoxP.PetersonL. Y.Van DyckeJ. L.CashM. E. (2003). Increasing self-determination: Teaching students to plan, work, evaluate, and adjust. Exceptional Children, 69, 431–447.
32.
MasonC.FieldS.SawilowskyS. (2004). Implementation of self-determination activities and student participation in IEPs. Exceptional Children, 70, 441–451.
33.
MithaugD. E. (1993). Self-regulation theory: How optimal adjustment maximizes gain. Westport, CT: Praeger.
34.
MithaugD. E.MithaugD.AgranM.MartinJ.WehmeyerM. L., (Eds.). (2003). Self-determined learning theory: Construction, verification, and evaluation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35.
National Council on Disability. (2004). Improving educational outcomes for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
36.
NelsonN. J.BabyakA.GonzalezJ.BennerG. J. (2003). An investigation of the types of problem behaviors exhibited by K–12 students with emotional or behavioral disorders in public school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 348–359.
37.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
38.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, Pub. L. No. 102–569, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1992).
39.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105–220, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1998).
40.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
41.
SabornieE. J.deBettencourtL. U. (2004). Teaching students with mild and high-incidence disabilities at the secondary level (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42.
ScanlonD.MellardD. F. (2002). Academic and participation profiles of school-age dropouts with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 239–258.
43.
SnyderE. P. (2002). Teaching students with combined behavioral disorders and mental retardation to lead their own IEP meetings. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 340–357.
44.
SnyderE. P.ShapiroE. S. (1997). Teaching students with emotional/behavioral disorders the skills to participate in the development of their own IEPs. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 246–249.
45.
SowersJ.PowersL. (1995). Enhancing the participation and independence of students with severe physical and multiple disabilities in performing community activities. Mental Retardation, 33, 209–220.
46.
StoneC. A.MayA. L. (2002). The accuracy of academic self-evaluations in adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 370–383.
47.
TestD. W.MasonC.HughesC.KonradM.NealeM.WoodW. M. (2004). Student involvement in individualized education program meetings. Exceptional Children, 70, 391–412.
48.
ThomaC. A.NathansonR.BakerS. R.TamuraR. (2002). Self-determination: What do special educators know and where do they learn it?Remedial and Special Education, 23, 242–247.
49.
TrainorA. (2002). Self-determination for students with learning disabilities: Is it a universal value?Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 711–725.
50.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
51.
WagnerM.CametoR.NewmanL. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
52.
WehmeyerM. L. (2001). Assessment in self-determination: Guiding instruction and transition planning. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26 (4), 41–49.
53.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (2000). A national survey of teachers' promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34, 58–68.
54.
WehmeyerM. L.FieldS.DorenB.JonesB.MasonC. (2004). Self-determination and student involvement in standards-based reform. Exceptional Children, 70, 413–425.
55.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc's self-determination scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.
56.
WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.
57.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
58.
WolmanJ. M.CampeauP. L.DuBoisP. A.MithaugD. E.StolarskiV. S. (1994). AIR self-determination scale and user guide. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.
59.
WoodS. J.CroninM. E. (1999). Students with emotional/behavioral disorders and transition planning: What the follow-up studies tell us. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 327–345.
60.
ZhangD.KatsiyannisA.ZhangJ. (2002). Teacher and parent practice on fostering self-determination of high school students with mild disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 157–169.
61.
ZhangD.WehmeyerM. L.ChenL. (2005). Parent and teacher engagement in fostering the self-determination of students with disabilities: A comparison between the United States and the Republic of China. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 55–64.
