For over a decade, University of Florida researchers worked with middle schools in a large urban and suburban south Florida district, as they developed and then worked to sustain inclusive reform. One middle school, Socrates, was notably successful, having built its inclusion model on a foundation of previous reform and a school culture characterized by shared decision making, collaboration, and teaming. For 4 years, we studied Socrates and the sustainability of its program. Inclusion was not sustained; our analysis of teacher and administrator interviews revealed three primary factors that help explain why: leadership change, teacher turnover, and state and district assessment policy change. Reduced support for the program, a by-product of the primary factors, also contributed to the lack of sustainability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshtonP. T.WebbR. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
2.
BallS. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London: Methuen.
3.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Education of All Handicapped Children Act. (1975). Pub. L. No. 94–142.
5.
FettermanD. M. (1983). Ethnography in educational research: The dynamics of diffusion. Educational Researcher, 11 (1), 17–22.
6.
FlorianJ. (2000). Sustaining education reform: Influential factors. (Report No. EA 031023). Aurora, CO: Mid Continent Research for Education and Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 453 583).
7.
FurneyK. S.HasaziS. B.Clark/KeefeK.HartnettJ. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of shifting policy landscapes in special and general education reform. Exceptional Children, 70, 81–94.
8.
GerstenR.ChardD.BakerS. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445–457.
9.
HubermanA. M.MilesA. B. (1984). Innovation up close. How school improvement works. New York: Plenum.
10.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. (1997). Pub. L. No. 105–17, 611 et seq.
11.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499–534.
12.
KilgoreK.GriffinC. C.SindelarP. T.WebbR. B. (2001). Restructuring for inclusion: A Story of middle school inclusion (Part I). The Middle School Journal, 33 (2), 44–51.
13.
KilgoreK.GriffinC. C.SindelarP. T.WebbR. B. (2002). Restructuring for inclusion: Changing teaching practices (Part II). The Middle School Journal, 33 (3), 7–13.
14.
KlingnerJ. K.ArguellesM. E.HughesM. T.VaughnS. (2001). Examining the school wide “spread” of research-based practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 221–234.
15.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.HughesM. T.ArguellesM. E. (1999). Sustaining research-based practices in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 20 (5), 263–274.
16.
No Child Left Behind Act: Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107–110, §2102(4).
17.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
PfaffenbergerB. (1988). Microcomputer applications in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
ShermanR. R.WebbR. B. (Eds.). (1988). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. London: Falmer.
20.
SmithL. M. (1978). An evolving logic of participant participation in educational ethnography and other case studies. In ShulmanL. (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, (Vol. 6, pp. 316–377). Ithaca, IL: Peacock Press.
21.
SpradleyJ. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
22.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
23.
StakeR. (1980) The case study method in social inquiry. In SimonsH. (Ed.), Towards a science of the singular (pp. 62–73). Norwich, England: Centre for Applied Research in Education.
24.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research methods: The search for meaning. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
StraussA. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
27.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ.HughesM. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66, 163–171.
28.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.HughesM. T. (2004). Sustainability of research-based practices: Implications for students with disabilities. In SorrellsA. M.RiethH. J.SindelarP. T. (Eds.), Critical issues in special education: Access, diversity, accountability (pp. 135–153). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
WebbR.GlesneC. (1992). Teaching qualitative research. In LeComptM. D.MillroyW. L.PreissleJ. (Eds.), The Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 771–813). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
WillM. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
