This study inquired into the meaning of family-professional partnerships from the perspective of Japanese families of children with disabilities. Data were collected from 30 mothers who participated in focus groups and/or interviews in Japan. Qualitative data analysis guided identification of four themes. The study's contributions are discussed in relation to not only Japanese society, but also to the global community including the United States. The study's implications for developing partnerships with culturally diverse families also are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenR. I.PetrC. G. (1996). Toward developing standards and measurements for family-centered practice in family support programs. In SingerG. H. S.PowersL. E.OlsonA. L. (Eds.), Redefining family support: Innovations in public-private partnerships (pp. 57–86). Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Blue-BanningM.SummersJ. A.FranklandH. C.NelsonL. L.BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70, 167–184.
3.
BiklenD. (1992). Schooling without labels: Parents, educators, and inclusive education. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BondM.KeysC. (1993). Empowerment, diversity, and collaboration: Promoting synergy on community boards. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 37–57.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrothersonM. J. (1994). Interactive focus group interviewing: A qualitative research method in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 101–118.
8.
CunninghamC.DavisH. (1985). Working with parents: Frameworks for collaboration. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
9.
DeChilloN.KorenP. E.MezeraM. (1996). Families and professionals in partnership. In StroulB. A. (Ed.), Children's mental health: Creating systems of care in a changing society (pp. 389–407). Baltimore: Brookes.
10.
DeChilloN.KorenP. E.SchultzeK. H. (1994). From paternalism to partnership: Family and professional collaboration in children's mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64, 564–576.
11.
DinnebeilL. A.HaleL. M.RuleS. (1996). A qualitative analysis of parents' and service coordinators' description of variables that influence collaborative relationships. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16, 322–347.
12.
DunstC. J.PagetK. D. (1991). Parent-professional partnerships and family empowerment. In FineM. J. (Ed.), Collaboration with parents of exceptional children (pp. 25–44). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Company.
13.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
14.
HarrisonP. J.LynchE. W.RosanderK.BortonW. (1990). Determining success in interagency collaboration: An evaluation of processes and behaviors. Infants and Young Children, 3, 69–78.
15.
HayashiR.OkuhiraM. (2001). The disability rights movement in Japan: Past, present, and future. Disability and Society, 16, 855–869.
16.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (1999). Culture in special education: Building reciprocal family-professional relationships. Baltimore: Brookes.
17.
KliewerC. (1998). Schooling children with Down syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility. New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
KnoxM.ParmenterT. R.AtkinsonN.YazbeckM. (2000). Family control: The views of families who have a child with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 17–28.
19.
KodamaM. (1998). Watashi-wa-watashirashii-shougaiji-no-hahadeii [Being a mother of a child with disabilities in my own way]. Tokyo, Japan: Budou-sha.
20.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
LintonS. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
24.
MatsuiW. T. (1996). Japanese families. In McGoldrickM.GlordanoJ.PearceJ. K. (Eds.), Ethnicity and family therapy (2nd ed., pp. 268–280). New York: Guilford.
25.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology Japan. (2001). 21seiki-no-tokusyukyouiku-no-arikata-ni-tuite: Hitorihitori-no-nizu-ni-oujitatokubetu-na-sien-no-arikata-ni-tuite [Final report on special education in the 21st century: Framework of special support provision based on individual needs]. Retrieved October 15, 2001, from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chousa/shotou/006/toushin/010102.htm.
27.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology Japan. (2003). Kongo-no-tokubetsu-sien-ky-oiku-no-arikata-ni-tsuite [Final report on the direction of the special needs education in the next era]. Retrieved April 11, 2003, from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chousa/shotou/018/toushin/030301.htm.
28.
Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan. (1998). Syakaihukusikisokouzoukeikaku-ni-tuite: Chukanmatome-no-youten [A preliminary report on restructuring plan of the fundamental social welfare system framework]. Retrieved January 26, 2001, from http://www1.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/1006/h0617-1.html.
29.
MusgraveJ.AnnissM. (1996). Relationships dynamics: Theory and analysis. New York: The Free Press.
30.
NakanoT.TazawaA.KanekoT.NakatosiT.IwasakiS.TakizawaK. (Eds.). (1998). Riyosyasyutai-no-kazokuenzyo: Syougaiji-to-kazoku-no-kurashi-wo-kangaeru [Consumer-centered family support: Support lives of children with disabilities and their families.]Chiba, Japan: Taiyo-sya.
31.
ParkJ.TurnbullA. P. (2001). Cross-cultural competency and special education: Perceptions and experiences of Korean parents of children with special needs. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 133–147.
32.
ParkJ.TurnbullA. P. (2003). Service integration in early intervention: Determining interpersonal and structural factors for its success. Infants and Young Children, 16, 48–58.
33.
ParkJ.TurnbullA. P.ParkH. S. (2001). Quality of partnerships in service provision for Korean American parents of children with disabilities: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of the Associations for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 158–170.
34.
PinderhughesE. (1995). Empowering diverse populations: Family practice in the 21st century. Families in society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, (CEU article no. 50), 131–140.
35.
ScorgieK.WilgoshL.McDonaldL. (1999). Transforming partnerships: Parent life management issues when a child has mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 395–405.
36.
SkrticT. M. (1985). Doing naturalistic research into educational organizations. In LincolnY. S. (Ed.), Organizational theory and inquiry: The paradigm revolution (pp. 185–220). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
TurnbullA. P.TurbivilleV.TurnbullH. R. (2000). Evolution of family-professional partnerships: Collective empowerment as the model for the early twenty-first century. In ShonkoffJ. P.MeiselsS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp. 630–650). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Collaborating for empowerment (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
39.
YamaguchiK.KanekoT. (2000). Tokusyukyoiku-no-tenbou: Syougaiji-kyouiku-kara-tokubetsu-sien-ky-ouiku-he [Current trends in special education: From education of disabled students to the special needs education]. Tokyo, Japan: Nihon-bunka-kagaku-sya.
