An overview of the many types of studies that fall into the qualitative design genre is provided. Strategies that qualitative researchers use to establish the authors' studies as credible and trustworthy are listed and defined. So that readers will recognize the important contribution qualitative studies have made in the field of special education, a range of well-known and lesser known examples of qualitative research are reviewed. The quality indicators that are important in conducting and evaluating qualitative research are identified. Finally, as an example of the evidence that can be produced using qualitative methods, the authors provide a summary of how 3 studies have provided important information that can be used to inform policy and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanJ. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: Pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. London: Falmer.
2.
AngrosinoM. V. (1998). Opportunity house: Ethnographic stories of mental retardation. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
3.
AschA.FineM. (1988). Introduction: Beyond pedestals. In AschA.FineM. (Eds.), Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics (pp. 1–38). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
BlattB.KaplanF. (1966). Christmas in purgatory: A photographic essay on mental retardation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BogdanR. (1988). Freak show: Exhibiting human oddities for amusement and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
BogdanR.TaylorS. (1976). The judged, not the judges: An insider's view of mental retardation. American Psychologist, 31, 47–52.
7.
BogdanR.TaylorS. (1994). The social meaning of mental retardation: Two life stories. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
BosC.RichardsonV. (1993). Qualitative research and learning disabilities. In VaughanS.BosC. (Eds.), Research issues in learning disabilities (pp. 178–201). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9.
BrantlingerE. A. (1986). Making decisions about special education: Do low-income parents have the information they need?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 95–101.
10.
BrantlingerE. A. (1994). High-income and low-income adolescents' views of special education. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9, 384–407.
11.
BrantlingerE. A. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of non-recognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67, 425–460.
12.
BrantlingerE. A. (1999). Inward gaze and activism as moral next steps in inquiry. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 30, 413–429.
13.
CamboneJ. (1993). Teaching troubled children: A case study in effective classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
CharltonJ. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
ClareE. (1999). Exile and pride: Disability, queerness, and liberation. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
16.
ColesG. (1987). The learning mystique: A critical look at learning disabilities. New York: Fawcett.
17.
ConnorM. H.BoskinJ. (2001). Overrepresentation of bilingual and poor children in special education classes: A continuing problem. Journal of Children & Poverty, 7, 23–32.
18.
DanforthS.NavarroV. (1998). Speech acts: Sampling the social construction of mental retardation in everyday life. Mental Retardation, 36, 31–43.
19.
DavisL. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso.
20.
DorrisM. (1989). The broken cord. New York: Harper & Row.
21.
DuplassD.PseudonymSmithT. (1995). Hearing Dennis through his own voice: A redefinition. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 144–148.
22.
EdgertonR. B. (1967). Cloak of competence: Stigma in the lives of the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
ErvellesN. (2000). Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory, 30, 25–48.
24.
FeatherstoneH. (1980). A difference in the family. New York: Basic Books.
25.
FergusonD. L.FergusonP. M. (1986). The new victors: A progressive policy analysis of work reform for people with very severe handicaps. Mental Retardation, 24, 331–338.
26.
FierrosE. G.ConroyJ. W. (2002). Double jeopardy: An exploration of restrictiveness and race in special education. In LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 39–70). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
27.
FoucaultM. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Random House.
28.
FoucaultM. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage.
29.
GabelS. (2001). “I wash my face in dirty water”: Narratives of disability and pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 52, 31–47.
30.
GerschickT. J. (1998). Sisyphus in a wheelchair: Men with physical disabilities confront gender domination. In O'BrienJ.HowardJ. A. (Eds.), Everyday inequalities: Critical inquiries (pp. 189–211). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31.
GlesneC. (1997). That rare feeling: Re-presenting research through poetic transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 202–221.
32.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylum: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Penguin.
33.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
GrandinT.ScarianoM. M. (1986). Emergence: Labeled autistic. Novato, CA: Arena Press.
35.
GrantC. A.SleeterC. E. (1986). After the school bell rings. London: Falmer.
36.
GroceN. E. (1985). “The town fool”: An oral history of a mentally retarded individual in small town society. In FergusonP. M.FergusonD. L.TaylorS. J. (Eds.), Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader (pp. 175–196). New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
HahnH. (1983). Paternalism and public policy. Society, 20, 36–44.
38.
HahnH. (1997). Advertising the acceptably employable image: Disability and capitalism. In DavisL. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 172–186). New York: Routledge.
39.
HarperD. (2000). Reimaging visual methods: Galileo to neuroromancer. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. (pp. 717–732). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
HarryB. (1996). These families, those families: The impact of researcher identity on the research act. Exceptional Children, 64, 292–300.
41.
HarryB.DayM.QuistF. (1998). “He can't really play”: An ethnographic study of sibling acceptance and interaction. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 23, 289–299.
42.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. K.SturgesK.MooreR. (2002). Of rocks and soft places: Using qualitative methods to investigate the processes that result in disproportionality. In LosenD. J.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 71–92). Boston: Harvard Education Press.
43.
HarryB.SturgesK.KlingnerJ. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: Mapping the process. Manuscript submitted for publication.
44.
HenshelA. M. (1972). The forgotten ones: A sociological study of Anglo and Chicano retardates. Austin: University of Texas Press.
45.
HeshusiusL. (1981). Meaning of life as experienced by persons labeled retarded in a group home: A participant observation study. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
46.
ItardJ. M. G. (1962). The wild boy of Aveyron (HumphreyG.HumphreyM., Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1806).
47.
JimenezR. T.GerstenR. (1999). Lessons and dilemmas derived from literacy instruction of two Latina/o teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 265–301.
48.
KalyanpurM.HarryB. (1999). Culture in special education: Building reciprocal family–professional relationships. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
49.
KellerH. (1955). Teacher: Anne Sullivan Macy. New York: Andor.
50.
KittayE. F. (1999). Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York and London: Routledge.
51.
KliewerC. (1998). Schooling children with Down syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility. New York: Teachers College Press.
52.
KliewerC.BiklenD. (2001). “School's not really a place for reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.
53.
LeeP. W. (1999). In their own voices: An ethnographic study of low-achieving students within the context of school reform. Urban Education, 34, 214–244.
54.
LinnemanR. D. (2001). Idiots: Stories about mindedness and mental retardation. New York: Peter Lang.
55.
LintonS. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
56.
MacNeilC. (2000). The pros and cons of poetic representation in evaluation reporting. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 359–367.
57.
MattinsonJ. (1971). Marriage and mental handicap. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
MehanH. (1991). The school's work of sorting students. In BodenD.ZimmermanD. (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 71–90). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
61.
MehanH.HertwerkA.MeihlsJ. L. (1986). Handicapping the handicapped. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
62.
MercerJ. R. (1973). Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
MeyerL. H.ParkH. S.Grenot-ScheyerM.SchwartzI. S.HarryB. (1998). Making friends: The influences of culture and development. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
65.
OliverM. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
66.
PeshkinA. (1988). In search of subjectivity–one's own. Educational Researcher, 17, 17, 22.
67.
PetersS. (2000). Is there a disability culture? A syncretization of three possible world views. Disability and Society, 15, 583–601.
68.
PressleyM. (2001). Barbara Wiesner. In PressleyM.AllingtonR. L.Wharton-McDonaldR.BlockC. C.MorrowL. M. (Eds.), Learning to read: Lessons from exemplary first-grade classrooms (pp. 95–114). New York: Guilford Press.
69.
PugachM. C. (2001). The stories we choose to tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education. Exceptional Children, 67, 439–453.
70.
RaoS. S. (2000). Perspectives of an African American mother on parent–professional relationships in special education. Mental Retardation, 38, 475–488.
71.
RichardsonJ. (1999). Common, delinquent, and special: The institutional shape of special education. New York: Falmer.
72.
RichardsonV.CasanovaU.PlacierP.GuilfoyleK. (1989). School children at-risk. London: Falmer.
73.
RogersL.SwadenerB. B. (2001) Semiotics & disability. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
74.
RonaiC. R. (1997). On loving and hating my mentally retarded mother. Mental Retardation, 35, 417–432.
75.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and pupils' intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
SmithT. J. (1997, March). Storying moral dimensions of disordering: Teacher inquiry into the social construction of severe emotional disturbance. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Chicago, IL.
86.
TaylorS. J. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 13, 41–53.
87.
ThomsonR. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
88.
TomlinsonS. (1982). A sociology of special education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
89.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (Eds.). (1979). Parents speak out: Growing up with a handicapped child. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
90.
VarenneH.McDermottR. (1998). Successful failure: The school America builds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
91.
WolcottH. (1990). On seeking—and rejecting—validity in qualitative research. In EisnerE.PeshkinA. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121–152). New York: Teachers College Press.
92.
WolfensbergerW. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
93.
ZetlinA. G.HosseiniA. (1989). Six postschool case studies of mildly learning handicapped young adults. Exceptional Children, 55, 405–411.
