This study contrasts the validity of 2 early reading curriculum-based measurement (CBM) measures: word identification fluency and nonsense word fluency. At-risk children (n = 151) were assessed (a) on criterion reading measures in the fall and spring of first grade and (b) on the 2 CBM measures each week for 7 weeks and twice weekly for an additional 13 weeks. Concurrent and predictive validity for CBM performance level and predictive validity for CBM slopes demonstrated the superiority of word identification fluency over nonsense word fluency. Findings are discussed in terms of the measures' utility for identifying children in need of intensive instruction and for monitoring children's progress through first grade.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BiemillerA. (1977–1978). Relationship between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223–253.
2.
BrownA. L.SmileyS. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of meta-cognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1–8.
3.
BudescuD. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542–551.
4.
DenoS. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
FryE. B. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 513–516.
7.
FuchsD.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2004). Identifying students with learning disabilities using a response-to-instruction approach in first grade. Manuscript in preparation.
8.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1992). Limitations of a feelgood approach to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3 (2), 93–97.
9.
FuchsL. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172–186.
10.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–501.
11.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460.
12.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429–438.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (1989b). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10 (2), 43–52.
14.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (1989c). Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103–111.
15.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FergusonC. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58, 436–450.
16.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
17.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaxwellL. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9 (2), 20–29.
18.
GoodR. H.SimmonsD. C.IIIKame'enuiE. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257–288.
19.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1981). The asymptotic distribution of commonality components. Psychometrika, 46, 331–336.
20.
HintzeJ. M.ShapiroE. S. (1997). Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula?Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351–375.
21.
HintzeJ. M.ShapiroE. S.LutzG. (1994). The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 188–202.
22.
JenkinsJ. R.HeliotisJ.HaynesM.BeckK. (1986). Does passive learning account for disabled readers' comprehension deficits in ordinary reading situations?Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 69–75.
23.
JensenA. R. (1981). Straight talk about mental tests. New York: Free Press.
24.
MarstonD.FuchsL. S.DenoS. L. (1986). Measuring pupil progress: A comparison of standardized achievement tests and curriculum-related measures. Diagnostique, 11, 77–90.
25.
McDonnellL. M.McLaughlinM. J.MorisonP. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
26.
McMasterK. N.FuchsD.FuchsL S.ComptonD. L. (in press) Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children.
27.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
SchatschneiderC.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.FoormanB. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
29.
ThorndikeR. L.HagenE. (1969). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
30.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SmallS.FanueleD. (2003, December). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-reading disabled children: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Response-To-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
31.
WalkerH. M.LevJ. (1953). Statistical inference. New York: Holt & Co.
32.
WessonC. L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation. Exceptional Children, 57, 246–257.
33.
WoodcockR. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests (Rev. ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
