Research on variables that predict disproportionate representation of minority students in special education has often ignored an important variable—academic achievement. This study examined the prediction of representation of students from various minority racial/ethnic groups using district-level academic, demographic, and economic blocks of variables. The relative strength of these blocks was tested using weighted multiple least squares regression. The results show that academic achievement added significantly to predictive models for various racial/ethnic groups and disability categories. Implications and directions for future research are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArtilesA. J.Aguirre-MunozZ.AbediJ. (1998). Predicting placement in learning disabilities programs: Do predictors vary by ethnic group?Exceptional Children, 64, 543–559.
2.
ArtilesA. J.TrentS. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. Journal of Special Education, 27, 410–437.
3.
BaronaA.FaykusS. (1993). The simultaneous effects of sociocultural variables and WISC-R factors on MR, LD, and non-placement of ethnic minorities in special education. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 66–74.
4.
CampbellJ. R.HomboC. M.MazzeoJ. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES No. 2000–469).
5.
ChinnP. C.HughesS. (1987). Representation of minority students in special education classes. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (4), 41–46.
6.
CoutinhoM. J.OswaldD. P. (1998). Understanding identification, placement and school completion rates for children with disabilities: The influence of economic, demographic, and educational variables. In GadowK. D.BailerI. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 12, pp. 43–78). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
Del'HommeM.KasariC.FornessS. R.BagleyR. (1996). Prereferral intervention and students at-risk for emotional or behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 272–285.
8.
DonahueP. L.VoelklK. E.CampbellJ. R.MazzeoJ. (1999). The NAEP 1998 reading report card for the nation and the states. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES No. 1999–500).
9.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10.
DuncanG. J.Brooks-GunnJ. (Eds.). (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11.
FinnJ. D. (1982). Patterns in special education placement as revealed by the OCR survey. In HellerK. A.HoltzmanW.MessickS. (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 322–381). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
12.
FleissJ. L. (1994). Measures of effect size for categorical data. In CooperH.HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 245–260). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.RourkeB. P.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (1992). The validity of discrepancy-based definitions of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555–561.
14.
FornessS. R.KavaleK. A.MacMillanD. L.AsarnowJ. R.DuncanB. B. (1996). Early detection and prevention of emotional or behavioral disorders: Developmental aspects of systems of care. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 226–240.
15.
GottliebJ.AlterM.GottliebB.WishnerJ. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 453–465.
16.
GreenwaldE. A.PerskyH. R.CampbellJ. R.MazzeoJ. (1999). The NAEP 1998 writing report card for the nation and states. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES No. 1999–462).
17.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.BocianK. M. (1997). Teachers as “tests”: Differential validity of teacher judgments in identifying students at-risk for learning difficulties. School Psychology Review, 26, 47–60.
18.
GriffinM. D. (1995). African American households and community effects on economic deprivation. In JacobsonC. K. (Ed.), American families: Issues in race and ethnicity (pp. 301–322). New York: Garland.
19.
HandyA. J. (1999). Ethnocentrism and black students with disabilities: Bridging the cultural gap, volume I. New York: Vantage Press.
20.
HellerK.HoltzmanW.MessickS. (Eds.). (1982). Placement of children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
HodgkinsonH. L. (1995). What should we call people? Race, class, and the Census for 2000. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 173–179.
22.
HospJ. L. (2002). Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Academic, economic, and demographic predictors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
23.
HospJ. L.HospM. K. (2001). Behavior differences between African American and Caucasian students: Issues for assessment and intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 336–350.
24.
HospJ. L.ReschlyD. J. (2002). Predictors of restrictiveness of placement for African American and Caucasian students. Exceptional Children, 68, 225–238.
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1997, 1999). 20 U. S. C. 1400 et. Seq. (Statute). 34 C.F.R. 300 (Regulations).
26.
JohnsonW. R.NealD. (1998). Basic skills and the black-white earnings gap. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 480–497). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27.
MacMillanD. L.FornessS. R. (1998). The role of IQ in special education placement decisions: Primary and determinative or peripheral and inconsequential. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 239–253.
28.
MacMillanD. L.ReschlyD. J. (1998). Overrepresentation of minority students: The case for greater specificity of the variables examined. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 15–24.
29.
MarkowitzJ.GarciaS. B.EichelbergerJ. (1997). Addressing the disproportionate representation of students from racial and ethnic minority groups in special education: A resource document (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406810).
30.
McLaughlinD.DroriG.RossM. (2000). School level correlates of academic achievement: Student assessment score in SASS public schools. Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES No. 2000–303).
31.
MeeceJ. L.Kurtz-CostesB. (2001). Introduction: The schooling of ethnic minority children and youth. Educational Psychologist, 36, 1–7.
32.
MittlerP. (1999). Equal opportunities—for whom?British Journal of Special Education, 26, 3–7.
33.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). Common core of data (CCD): School years 1993–1994 Through 1997–1998 [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
34.
OswaldD. P.CoutinhoM. J.BestA. M.SinghN. N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 194–206.
35.
OwensS. (1997). Coverage evaluation of the 1994-95 common core of data: Public elementary/secondary education universe survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES No. 97–505).
36.
PetersonK. M. H.ShinnM. R. (2002). Severe discrepancy models: Which best explains school identification practices for learning disabilities?School Psychology Review, 31, 459–476.
37.
ProctorB. D.DalakerJ. (2002). Poverty in the United States: 2001 (U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports P60-219). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear modeling: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
ReynoldsA.TempleJ. A.RobertsonD. L.MannE. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2339–2346.
40.
RichardsonS. (1981). Family characteristics associated with mild mental retardation. In BegabM.HaywoodH. C.GraberH. (Eds.), Psychosocial influences in retarded performance (Vol. II, pp. 29–43). Baltimore: University Park Press.
41.
SameroffA. (2000). Ecological perspectives on developmental risk. In OsofskyJ. D.FitzgeraldH. E. (Eds.), WAIMH handbook of infant mental health, vol. 4: Infant mental health in groups at high risk (pp. 3–33). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
SchweinhartL.BarnesH.WeikartD.BarnettW. S.EpsteinA. S. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry preschool study through age 27. In Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, Number 10. Ypsilanti, MI: The High/Scope Press.
43.
SernaL. A.FornessS. R.NielsenM. E. (1998). Intervention versus affirmation: Proposed solutions to the problem of disproportionate minority representation in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 48–51.
44.
ShinnM. R.TindalG. A.SpiraD. A. (1987). Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests?Exceptional Children, 54, 32–40.
45.
SteinbergD.CollaP. (1995). CART: Tree-structured non-parametric data analysis. San Diego, CA: Sal-ford Systems.
46.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
47.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (2000). Elementary and secondary school civil rights compliance report [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Author.
48.
WagnerM. (1995). The contributions of poverty and ethnic background to the participation of secondary school students in special education. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Special Programs.
49.
WestJ.DentonK.ReaneyL. M. (2000). The kindergarten year: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, kindergarten class of 1998–99. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES No. 2001023).
50.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozinneB. (1983). LD or not LD? That's not the question!Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 29–31.
51.
YsseldykeJ. E.VanderwoodM. L.ShrinerJ. (1997). Changes over the past decade in special education referral to placement probability: An incredibly reliable practice. Diagnostique, 23, 193–203.
