Increased attention has been given to the perplexing issue of students with both disabilities and abilities. This study investigated whether a talent development approach could be adapted for persons with Williams syndrome (WS). Available school records and extensive interviews provided evidence that educational programs for these students with WS had focused primarily on remediating their deficits. Although the majority of participants demonstrated a lifelong interest in music, few had been able to participate in music enrichment during their entire school experience. For this group, use of a talent development approach focusing on strengths, interests, and learning style preferences was found to enhance all participants' understanding of mathematics and to provide opportunities for the further development of their abilities, especially their music potential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anonymous. (1985). Case history of a child with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics, 75, 962–968.
2.
BaumS.OwenS. V. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321–326.
3.
BaumS. M.RenzulliJ. S.HébertT. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224–235.
4.
BellugiU.BihrleA.JerniganT.TraunerD.DohertyS. (1990). Neuropsychological, neurological, and neuroanatomical profile of Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, (Suppl.), 6, 115–125.
5.
BellugiU.KlimaE. S.WangP. P. (1996). Cognitive and neural development: Clues from genetically based syndromes. In MagnussenD. (Ed.), The life-span development of individuals: Behavioral, neurobiological, and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 223–243). The Nobel Symposium. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BellugiU.LichtenbergerL.JonesW.LaiZ.St. GeorgeM. (2000). The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (Suppl. 1), 7–29.
7.
BloomB. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
8.
BoyleJ. D. (1992). Evaluation of music ability. In ColwellR. (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 247–265). New York: Schirmer/MacMillan.*
9.
BurnsD. E. (1987). The effects of group training activities on students creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
10.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York: Routledge.
11.
ClarkB. (1992), Growing up gifted. New York: Merrill.*
12.
DavisG. A.RimmS. B. (1994). Education of the gifted and talented. New York: Allyn & Bacon.*
13.
DiltsC. V.MorrisC. A.LeonardC. O. (1990). Hypothesis for the development of a behavioral steno-type in Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Supplement, 6, 126–131.
14.
DonA. J.SchellenbergE. G.RourkeB. P. (1999). Music and language skills of children with Williams syndrome, Child Neuropsychology, 5, 154–170.
15.
EinfieldS. L.HallW. (1994). Recent developments in the study of behavior phenotypes. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19, 275–280.
16.
EinfieldS. L.TongeB.FlorioT. (1997). Behavioral and emotional disturbance in individuals with Williams syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102 (1), 45–53.
17.
ErlandsonD. A.HarrisE. L.SkipperB. L.AllenS. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
18.
FinnR. (June, 1991). Different minds. Discover, 55–58.
19.
FlintJ.YuleW. (1994). Behavioral phenotypes. In RutterM.TaylorE.HersovL. (Eds.). Child and adolescent psychiatry: Modern approaches (3rd ed., pp. 666–689). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
20.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
21.
HébertT. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22–28.
22.
HébertT. P.SorensenM. F.RenzulliJ. S. (1997). Secondary Interest-A-Lyzer. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.*
23.
KettleK. E.RenzulliJ. S.RizzaM. G. (1998). Exploring student preferences for product development: My way … An expression style instrument. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42 (1), 49–60.
24.
LenhoffH. M. (1996, July). Music and Williams syndrome: A status report and goals. Paper presented at the Seventh International Professional Conference on Williams Syndrome, Valley Forge, PA.
25.
LenhoffH. M.WangP. P.GreenbergF.Bellugi (1997). Williams syndrome and the brain. Scientific American, 277, 68–73.
26.
LevineK. (1997). Williams syndrome: Information for teachers. Clawson, MI: The Williams Syndrome Association.
27.
LevitinD. J.BellugiU. (1998). Musical abilities in individuals with Williams syndrome. Music Perception, 15, 357–389.
28.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
29.
MacDonaldG. W.RoyD. L. (1988). Williams syndrome: A neuropsychological profile. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10 (2), 125–131.
MerriamS. G. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Bassey.
32.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd Ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.*
33.
NicholsonW. R.HockeyK. A. (1993). Williams syndrome: A clinical study of children and adults. Journal of Pediatric Child Health, 29, 468–472.
34.
OlenchakF. R. (1988). The schoolwide enrichment model in the elementary schools: A study of implementation stages and effects on educational excellence. In RenzulliJ. S. (Ed.), Technical report on research studies relating to the revolving door identification model (2nd ed., pp. 201–247). Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research, The University of Connecticut.
35.
OlenchakF. R.RenzulliJ. S. (1989). The effectiveness of the schoolwide enrichment model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 36–46.
36.
PagonR.BennettF.LaVeckB.StewartK.JohnsonJ. (1987). Williams syndrome: Features in late childhood and adolescence. Pediatrics, 80 (1), 85–91.
37.
PoberB. R.DykensE. M. (1993). Williams syndrome: An overview of medical, cognitive, and behavioral features. Mental Retardation, 5, 929–943.
38.
ReisS. M.GentryM.ParkS. (1995). Extending the pedagogy of gifted education to all students. (Research Monograph No. 95117). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
39.
ReisS. M.SchaderR.MilneH.ShuteL.DonA.StephensR.TiesoC. (in press). Music & Minds: Using a talent development approach for young persons with Williams Syndrome. Storrs, CT: The National Research on Gifted and Talented.
40.
RenzulliJ. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.*
41.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Re-examining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
42.
RenzulliJ. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In SternburgR. J.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
RenzulliJ. S. (Ed.). (1988). Technical report of research studies related to the enrichment triad/revolving door model (3rd Ed.). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut, Teaching the Talented Program.
44.
RenzulliJ. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.*
45.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.*
46.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1994). Research related to the schoolwide enrichment triad model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38 (1), 7–20.
47.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.*
48.
RenzulliJ. S.SmithL. H.RizzaM. G. (1997). The learning styles inventory. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.*
49.
SchackG. D.StarkoA. J.BurnsD. E. (1991). Self-efficacy and creative productivity: Three studies of above average ability children. Journal of Research in Education, 1 (1), 44–52.
50.
UdwinO.YuleW.MartinN. (1987). Cognitive abilities and behavioral characteristics of children with idiopathic infantile hypercalcaemia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28, 297–309.
51.
von ArnimG.EngelP. (1964). Mental retardation related to hypercalcaemia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 6, 366–377.
52.
YinR. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
