This study's purpose was to explore the effectiveness and feasibility of phonological awareness (PA) training with and without a beginning decoding component for kindergartners with disabilities in mainstream classrooms. Nineteen general educators, who taught at least one student with a disability, were assigned randomly within their schools to three groups: control, PA training, or PA training with beginning decoding instruction. Teachers in the two treatment groups conducted the treatments for about 20 weeks. Pre- and posttreatment data were collected on 25 children with disabilities. Statistical analyses indicated that the group of students with special needs participating in PA training with beginning decoding instruction did better than the other two groups. However, many children, including many of those in the most effective treatment, did not improve their reading skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 315 740).
2.
ElkoninD. B. (1973). USSR. In DowningJ. (Ed.), Comparative reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing. (pp. 551–557). New York: Macmillan.
3.
FarrR. C.StricklandD. S. (1995). Treasury of literature: First street collection for kindergarten. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Co.
4.
FuchsD.FuchsL.ThompsonA.Al OtaibaS.YenL.BraunM. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies for kindergarten: A teacher's manual. Available from www.peerassistedlearningstrategies.net.
5.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1986). Test procedure bias: A meta-analysis of examiner familiarity effects. Review of Educational Research, 56, 243–262.
6.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.PowerM. H.DaileyA. M. (1985). Bias in the assessment of handicapped children. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 185–198.
7.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ThompsonA.Al OtaibaS.YenL.BraunM.O'ConnorR. E. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.
8.
FuchsL.FuchsD.BishopN. (1992). Teacher planning for students with learning disabilities: Differences between general and special educators. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 120–128.
9.
GlassG. V.McGawB.SmithM. L. (1981). Metaanalysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.*
10.
GoldmanR.LynchM. E. (1986). High hat early reading program. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
11.
HatcherP. J.HulmeC.EllisA. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41–57.
12.
HedgesL. V.OlkinI. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.*
13.
HuefnerD. S. (1994). The mainstreaming cases: Tensions and trends for school administrators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 27–55.
14.
JuelC.GriffithP. L.GoughP. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.
15.
KantrowitzB.UnderwoodA. (1999, November 22). Dyslexia and the new science of reading. Newsweek, 133 (21), 72–77.
16.
LevyB. A.LysunchukL. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359–387.
17.
LundbergI.FrostJ.PetersenO. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
18.
McIntoshR.VaughnS.SchummJ. S.HaagerD.LeeO. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249–261.
19.
Oberti v. Board of Education of Clementon School District, 995 F.2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993).
20.
O'ConnorR. E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 43–54.
21.
O'ConnorR. E.Notari-SyversonN.VadasyP. (1996). Ladders to literacy: The effects of teacher-led phonological activities for kindergarten children with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 117–130.
22.
O'ConnorR. E.Notari-SyversonN.VadasyP. (1998). Ladders to literacy: A kindergarten activity book. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
23.
PogrowS. (2000). Success For All does not produce success for students. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 67–80.
24.
RosnerJ. (1974). Auditory analysis training with pre-readers. The Reading Teacher, 27, 379–385.
25.
ShareD.JormA.MacLeanR.MatthewsR. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.
26.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (Eds.) (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 416 465).
27.
TangelD. M.BlachmanB. A. (1992). Effect of phoneme awareness instruction on kindergarten children's invented spelling. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 233–258.
28.
TorgesenJ. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64.
29.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217–234.
30.
TroiaG. A. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28–52.
31.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321–363.
32.
WoodcockR. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
33.
YoppH. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.
