This study explored differences in the special education programming of African-American and Caucasian students. The school records of 230 3rd- through 5th-grade students identified as having a learning disability from four school districts in Delaware were examined. Data on 102 variables related to special education referral, identification, and placement were coded from the records and analyzed. Analyses of variance were used to identify main effects for each variable and its interaction with race. Although a clear pattern was found in variables related to restrictiveness of placement, the pattern was found to be similar for African-American and Caucasian students. Implications for future research are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArtilesA. L.TrentS. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. Journal of Special Education, 27, 410–437.
2.
Assistance to states for the education of children with disabilities: Final regulations, 64 Fed. Reg. 12, 12,40512,672 (1999). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 428 493).
3.
BradenJ. P. (1987). A comparison of regression and standard score discrepancy methods for learning disabilities identification: Effects on racial representation. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 23–29.
4.
ChinnP. C.HughesS. (1987). Representation of minority students in special education classes. Remedial and Special Education, 8(4), 41–46.
5.
Coalition to Save Our Children v. State Board of Education of Delaware. (1995). Civil Action Nos. 56-1816-1822-SLR, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.
6.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly mentally retarded. Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 23, 5–21.
7.
FinnJ. D. (1982). Patterns in special education placement as revealed by the OCR survey. In HellerK. A.HoltzmanW.MessickS. (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 322–381). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
HarryB.AndersonM. G. (1994). The disproportionate representation of African-American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. Journal of Negro Education, 63, 602–619.
9.
HilliardA. G. (1992). Behavioral style, culture, and teaching and learning. Journal of Negro Education, 61, 370–377.
10.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2000). Practical Meta-Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
12.
MacMillanD. L.SippersteinG. N.GreshamF. M. (1996). A challenge to the validity of mild mental retardation as a diagnostic category. Exceptional Children, 62, 356–371.
13.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.WornhoffS. A. (1990). Factors influencing the identification of black and white students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 362–366.
14.
PayetteK. A.ClarizioH. F. (1994). Discrepant team decisions: The effects of race, gender, achievement and IQ on LD eligibility. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 40–48.
15.
ReschlyD. J. (1988). Minority mild mental retardation overrepresentation: Legal issues, research findings, and reform trends. In WangM.ReynoldsM.WalbergH. (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice (pp. 23–41). Oxford: Pergamon.*
16.
ReschlyD. J. (1997). Disproportionate minority representation in general and special education: Patterns, issues, and alternatives. Des Moines: Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center, Drake University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 415 632).
17.
ReschlyD. J.WardS. M. (1991). Use of adaptive measures and overrepresentation of black students in programs for students with mild mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 96, 257–268.
18.
SerwatkaT. S.DeeringS.GrantP. (1995). Disproportionate representation of African Americans in emotionally handicapped classes. Journal of Black Studies, 25, 492–506.
19.
SerwatkaT. S.DoveT.HodgeW. (1986). Black students in special education: Issues and implications for community involvement. Negro Education Review, 37, 17–26.
20.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 424 722).
21.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Twenty-first annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 436 071).
