Teachers seeking to promote the self-determination of their students must enable them to become self-regulated problem-solvers. This article introduces a model of teaching, The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction, incorporating principles of self-determination, which enables teachers to teach students to become causal agents in their own lives. This model was field-tested with students with disabilities. Students receiving instruction from teachers using the model attained educationally relevant goals, showed enhanced self-determination, and communicated their satisfaction with the process. Teachers implementing the model likewise indicated their satisfaction with the process and suggested that they would continue to use the model after the completion of the field test.
AgranM.BlanchardC.WehmeyerM. (in press). Enhancing outcomes via The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilites.
3.
AgranM.MartinJ. E. (1987). Applying a technology of self-control in community environments for individuals who are mentally retarded. In HersenM.EislerR. M.MillerP. M. (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (pp. 108–151). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.*
4.
AgranM.WehmeyerM. L. (1999). Teaching problem solving to students with mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.*
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.*
6.
CardilloJ. E. (1994). Summary score conversion key. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (Eds.). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement (pp. 273–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Elbaum.*
7.
CarrR. W. (1979). Goal attainment scaling as a useful tool for evaluating progress in special education. Exceptional Children, 46, 88–95.
8.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
KanferF. H.GoldsteinA. P. (1986). Helping people change: A textbook of methods (3rd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.*
11.
KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.*
12.
MartinJ. E.BurgerD. L.Elias-BurgerS.MithaugD. E. (1988). Applications of self-control strategies to facilitate independence in vocational and instructional settings. In BrayN. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 155–193). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.*
13.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H. (1996). Choice-Maker: Infusing self-determination instruction into the IEP and transition process. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 215–236). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
14.
MartinJ. E.MarshallL. H. (1998). Choice-Maker: Choosing, planning and taking action. In WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J. (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in education planning, decision making and instruction (pp. 211–240). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
15.
MithaugD. E., (1996a). Equal opportunity theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.*
16.
MithaugD. E. (1996b). The optimal prospects principle. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 147–165). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
17.
MithaugD. E. (1998). Your right, my obligation?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 41–43.
18.
MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E.AgranM. (1987). Adaptability instruction: The goal of transitional programming. Exceptional Children, 53, 500–505.
19.
MithaugD. E.MartinJ. E.AgranM.RuschF. R. (1988). Why special education graduates fail: How to teach them to succeed. Colorado Springs, CO: Ascent.*
20.
MithaugD.WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.MartinJ.PalmerS., (1998). The self-determined learning model of instruction: Engaging students to solve their learning problems. In WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J. (Eds.), Making it happen: Student involvement in educational planning, decision-making and instruction (pp. 299–328). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
21.
NowickiS.DukeM. P. (1974). A locus of control scale for non-college as well as college adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 136–137.
22.
PalmerS.WehmeyerM. L. (1998). A teacher's guide to the use of The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Early elementary version. Arlington, TX: The Arc of the United States.*
23.
SandsD. J.SpencerK.GlinerJ.SwaimR. (1999). Structural equation modeling of student involvement in transition-related actions: The path of least resistance. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 17–27.
24.
SarasonS. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.*
25.
WehmeyerM. L. (1993a). Perceptual and psychological factors in career decision-making of adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities. Career Development of Exceptional Individuals, 16, 135–146.
26.
WehmeyerM. L. (1993b). Factor structure and construct validity of a locus of control scale with individuals with mental retardation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1055–1066.
27.
WehmeyerM. L. (1994). Perceptions of self-determination and psychological empowerment of adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disability, 29, 9–21.
28.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996a). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15–34). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
29.
WehmeyerM. L. (1996b). A self-report measure of self-determination for adolescents with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 282–293.
30.
WehmeyerM. L. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 175–209.
31.
WehmeyerM. L. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: Examining meanings and misinterpretations. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(1) 5–16.
32.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
33.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.PalmerS.MithaugD.BlanchardC. (1998). A teacher's guide to the use of The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Adolescent version. Arlington, TX: The Arc of the United States.*
34.
WehmeyerM. L.KelchnerK. (1995). The Arc's self-determination scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc of the United States.*
35.
WehmeyerM. L.SchwartzM. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.
36.
WolmanJ.CampeauP.DuboisP.MithaugD.StolarskiV. (1994). AIR self-determination scale and user guide. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research.*
37.
ZhangD. (1998). The effect of self-determination instruction on high school students with mild disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans.*
