Recent advances in research on best practices for educating students with disabilities have improved the knowledge base about these practices. However, there remains a significant gap between the knowledge we have about these best practices, and the extent to which it has been implemented. Two common and simple explanations for this complex problem, “blame the teacher” and “blame the researcher,” are both inadequate to explain this gap. Sustainability grants are designed to help understand linkages between research and practice, so that the knowledge about effective practices might be better represented and implemented in classrooms. Some facilitators for sustainability are the ability of teachers to give input along the way; and a feeling of collaboration, sensitivity, and responsiveness between the researcher and the practitioner. Issues related to the extent to which sustainability can reasonably be expected over time are presented.
BallD. L. (1995). Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 354–363.
3.
BjorvellH.RossnerS. (1987). Long-term effects of commonly available weight reducing programmes in Sweden. The International Journal of Obesity, 11(1), 67–71.
4.
BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary and instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31–42.
5.
CarnineD. (1989). Teaching complex content to learning disabled students: The role of technology. Exceptional Children, 55, 524–533.
6.
ChalfantJ. C.PyshM. V. (1989). Teacher assistance teams: Five descriptive studies on 96 teams. Remedial and Special Education, 10(6), 49–58.
7.
DeshlerD. D.EllisE. S.LenzB. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver: Love.*
8.
DeyoR. A.PhillipsW. R. (1996). Low back pain: A primary care challenge. Spine, 21, 2826–2832.
DonovanJ. L. (1995). Patient decision making: The missing ingredient in compliance research. The International Journal of Technological Assessment and Health Care, 11, 443–455.
11.
EnglertC. S.GarmonA.MariageT.RozendalM.TarrantK.UrbaJ. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 253–277.
12.
EnglertC. S.RaphaelT. E.AndersonL. M.AnthonyH. M.StevensD. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 337–372.
13.
FowlerS. A. (1986). Peer-monitoring and self-monitoring: Alternatives to traditional teacher management. Exceptional Children, 52, 573–582.
14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 126–137.
15.
GerstenR.BakerS. (in press). Effective instruction for English-language learners: A multi-vocal approach toward research synthesis. In GerstenR.SchillerE.SchummJ. S.VaughnS. (Eds.), Issues and Research in Special Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.*
16.
GerstenR.MorvantM.BrengelmanS. U. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62(1), 52–66.
17.
GerstenR.VaughnS.DeshlerD.SchillerE. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466–476.
18.
GreenwoodC. R. (1998). Commentary: Align professional development, classroom practice, and student progress in the curriculum and you'll improve general education for all students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 75–84.
19.
HarrisK. C. (1995). School-based bilingual special education teacher assistance teams. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 337–343.
20.
HarryB.AllenN.McLaughlinM. (1995). Communication versus compliance: African-American parents' involvement in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 364–377.
21.
HendersonC. W. (1998, July 27). HIV exposed health-care workers won't take AIDS drugs. World Disease Weekly Plus.
22.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.HughesM. T.ArguellesM. E. (in press). Sustaining research-based practices in reading: A three year follow-up. Remedial and Special Education.
23.
MallionJ. M.BaguetJ. P.SicheJ. P.TremelF.de GuademarisR. (1998). Compliance, electronic monitoring and anti-hypertensive drugs. Journal of Hypertension-Supplement, 16(1), S75–9, 1988 Jan.
24.
MaloufD.SchillerE. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414–424.
25.
MarksS. U.GerstenR. (1998). Engagement and disengagement between special and general educators: An application of Miles and Huberman's Cross-case analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 34–56.
26.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (1998). Constructing more meaningful relationships in the classroom: Mnemonic research into practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 138–145.
27.
McKennaB. (1992). Special education research priorities focus on action. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 27–29.
28.
National Academy of Education. (1991). Research and the renewal of education. Stanford, CA: Author.*
29.
O'ConnorR. (in press). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
30.
PetersonA. (1995). Teacher-researcher compatibility: A view from both sides. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 364–367.
31.
RichardsonV. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10–18.
32.
RichardsonV.AndersP. L. (1998). A view from across the Grand Canyon. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 85–98.
33.
SchummJ. S.VaughnS. (1995). Getting ready for inclusion: Is the stage set?Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 169–179.
34.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.*
35.
StoneC. A. (1998). Moving validated instructional practices into the classroom: Learning from examples about the rough road to success. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 121–125.
36.
TharpR. G.GallimoreR. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.*
37.
TorgesenJ. K. (in press). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
38.
VaughnS.HughesM. T.SchummJ. S.KlingnerJ. K. (1998). A collaborative effort to enhance reading and writing instruction in inclusion classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 57–74.
39.
VaughnS.SchummJ. S. (1996). Classroom ecologies: Classroom interactions and implications for inclusion of students with learning disabilities. In SpeeceD. S.KeoghB. K. (Eds.), Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 107–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.*
40.
WoodwardJ.BaxterJ. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low achieving students in mainstreamed settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373–388.
