Perceptions are critical to making decisions about our environment, particularly contaminated sites. Gender differences in recreational use, attitudes toward environmental problems, and perceptions of land use for the Savannah River Site (Department of Energy) were examined in people living near the site. Bird-watching, photography, and fishing were the most common activities. Men engaged in more hunting, fishing, hiking, and camping, and women photographed more than men. There were significant gender differences in attitudes toward future land use, with women showing lower scores than men for hiking, camping, fishing, hunting, nuclear production, factories, building houses, and storage of nuclear waste. Maintaining the Savannah River Site as a National Environmental Research Park was the highest priority for both genders, whereas storing nuclear wastes and building homes ranked lowest for both. Planners should consider recreational use as an important future land use of this Department of Energy site, taking into account gender differences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barke, R. , & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Politics and scientific expertise: Scientists, risk perception and nuclear waste policy. Risk Analysis, 4, 425-439.
2.
Brody, C. J. (1984). Differences by sex in support for nuclear power. Social Forces, 63,209-288.
3.
Burger, J. , Sanchez, J., Gibbons, J. W., &. Gochfeld, M. (1997). Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen. Risk Analysis, 17, 313-320.
4.
Carney, R. E. (Ed.). (1971). Attitudes toward risk. In Risk taking behavior: Concepts, methods, and applications to smoking and drug abuse. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
5.
Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management . (1996). Report of the Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
6.
DeJoy, D. (1992). An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. Accident Analysis Prevention, 24, 237-246.
7.
Department of Energy (DOE) . (1996). Charting the course: The future use report (DOE/EM-0283). Washington, DC: Department of Energy.
8.
Dunlap, R. (1991). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965-1990. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 285-312.
9.
Fischhoff, B. (1985). Managing risk perception. Issues in Science and Technology, 2, 83-96.
10.
Fischhoff, B. (1994, June 6-8). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twentyyears of process. Addressing Agencies' Risk Communication Needs: A Symposium to Discuss Next Steps, Annapolis, MD.
11.
Flynn, J. , Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994a). Decidedly different: Expert and public views of risks from a radioactive waste repository. Risk Analysis, 6, 643-648.
12.
Flynn, J. , Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994b). Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis, 14, 1101-1108.
13.
Gibbons, A. R. (1993). The Savannah River Ecology Laboratory. In Encyclopedia Britannica (pp. 468-488). New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
14.
Gutteling, J. M. , & Wiegman, O. (1993). Gender-specific reactions to environmental hazards in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 28, 433-447.
15.
Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. , & Lach, D. H. (1991). Sex differences in attitudes toward nuclear war. Journal of Peace Research, 28, 161-174.
16.
Hance B. J. , Chess, C., & Sandman, P. (1989). Setting a context for explaining risk. RiskAnalysis, 9, 113-117.
17.
Jenni, K. E., Merkhofer , M. W., & Williams, C. (1995). The rise and fall of a risk-based priority system: Lessons from DOE's environmental restoration priority system. Risk Analysis, 15, 397-410.
18.
Jensen, M. P. (1987). Gender, sex roles, and attitudes toward war and nuclear weapons. Sex Roles, 17, 253-267.
19.
Kivimaki, M. , & Kalimo, R. (1993). Risk perception among nuclear power plant personnel: A survey. RiskAnalysis, 4, 421-424.
20.
Kunreuther, H. , Easterling, D., Desvousges, W., & Slovic, P. (1990). Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. RiskAnalysis, 10, 469-484.
21.
Mitchell, J. V. (1992). Perception of risk and credibility at toxic sites. RiskAnalysis, 12, 19-26.
22.
National Research Council (NRC) . (1983). Risk assessment in the federal government. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23.
National Research Council (NRC) . (1993). Issues in risk assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24.
National Research Council (NRC) . (1994). Building consensus through risk assessment and management of the Department of Energy's Environmental Remediation Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
25.
National Research Council (NRC) . (1995). Improving the environment: An evaluation of DOE's Environmental Management Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26.
Norton, S. B. , Rodier, D. J., Gentile, J. H., van der Scalie, W. H., Wood, W. P., & Slimak, M. W. (1992). A framework for ecological risk assessment at the EPA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 11, 1665-1672.
27.
Pillisuk, M. , & Acredolo, C. (1988). Fear of technological hazards: One concern or many?Social Behavior, 3, 17-24.
28.
Sanchez, J. , & Burger, J. (in press). Hunting and exposure: Estimating risk and future use at nuclear production sites. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment.
29.
Sandman, P. M. , Sachsman, D. B., Greenberg, M. R., & Gochfeld, M. (1987). Environmental risk and the press: An exploratory assessment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
30.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285.
31.
Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. RiskAnalysis, 13, 675-682.
32.
Slovic, P. , Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Rating the risks. Environment, 21, 14-20.
33.
Slovic, P. , Flynn, J., & Layman, M. (1991). Perceived risk, trust and the politics of nuclear waste. Science, 254, 1603-1607.
34.
Slovic, P. , Kraus, N. N., Lappe, H., Letzel, H., & Malmfors, T. (1989). Risk perception of prescription drugs: Report on a survey in Sweden. Pharmaceutical Medicine, 4, 43-65.
35.
Slovic, P. , Layman, M., & Flynn, J. (1991). Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment, 3, 7-11, 28-30.
36.
Slovic, P. , Malmfors, T., Krewski, D., Mertz, C. K., Neil, N., & Bartlett, S. (1995). Intuitive toxicology. Il. Expert and lay judgements of chemical risks in Canada. Risk Analysis, 15, 661-675.
37.
Spigner, C. , Hawkins, W., & Loren, W. (1993). Gender differences in preceptions of risk associated with alcohol and drug use among college students. Women's Health, 20, 87-97.
38.
Steger, M. A. , & Witte, S. L. (1989). Gender differences in environmental orientations: A comparison of publics and activists in Canada and the U.S. Western Political Quarterly, 42, 627-649.
39.
Stern, P. C. , Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concerns. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
40.
Wernick, I. K. (Ed.). (1995). Communily risk profiles. New York: Rockefeller University Press.
