This study identified environmental characteristics associated with residential burglaries of apartment complexes predominantly occupied by students, located near two major universities and a community college in Tallahassee, Florida. Through observation and measurement of environmental characteristics, results showed that accessibility played little role in differentiating burglarized and nonburglarized apartment units. Yet, burglarized units were disproportionately likely to be located on the comer of the building and on the first floor. Results also showed that apartment units with reported burglaries in 1993 were less surveillable than apartment units with no reported burglaries—i.e., burglarized units were more obstructed by foliage or structure. Finally, through surveying student apartment residents, results suggested that burglaries largely occurred at times when students reported being away from their apartments for purposes of attending classes, engaging in recreational activities, or shopping. The results add additional support for the well-established link between environmental characteristics and residential burglary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akers, R. (1994). Criminological theories: Introduction and evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
2.
Akerstrom, M. (1983). Crooks and Squares. Lund, Sweden: Student literature.
3.
Almanac of Higher Education. (1993). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Angel, S. (1968). Discouraging crime through city planning. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.
5.
Bennett, T. , & Wright, R. (1983). Burglars perception of targets. Home Office Research Bulletin, 15, 18-20.
6.
Bennett, T. , & Wright, R. (1984). Constraints on burglary: The offender's perspective. In R. Clarke & T. Hope (Eds.), Coping with burglary. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
7.
Bevis, C. , & Nutter, J. (1977). Changing street layout to reduce residential burglary. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
8.
Boggs, S. (1964). The Ecology of Crime Occurrence in St. Louis: A Reconceptualization of Crime Rates and Patterns. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
9.
Brantingham, P. , & Brantingham, P. (1978). Residential burglary and urban form. Urban Studies, 12, 273-284.
10.
Brantingham, P. , & Branfingham, P. (1981). Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Brown, B. , & Altman, I. (1981). Territoriality and residential crime: A conceptual framework. In P. Brantingham & P. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Clarke, R. , & Mayhew, P. (1980). Designing out crime. London, England: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
13.
Cohen, L. , & Felson, M. (1979). Social change in crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
14.
Cohen, L. , Felson, M., & Land, K. (1980). Property crime rates in the United States: A macrodynamic analysis, 1947-1977: With ex ante forecasts for the mid-1980's. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 90-118.
15.
Cohen, L. , Kluegel, J., & Land, K. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and a test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review, 46, 505-524.
16.
Conklin, J. , & Bittner, E. (1973). Burglary in a suburb. Criminology, 2, 206-232.
17.
Cornish, D. , & Clarke, R. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Cromwell, P. (1995). In their own words: Criminals on crime. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
19.
Cromwell, P. , Olson, J., & Avary, D. (1991). Breaking and entering: An ethnographic analysis of burglary. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Davidson, R. (1984). Burglary in the community: Patterns of localization in offender-victim relations. In R. Clarke & T. Hope (Eds.), Coping with burglary. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
21.
Decker, J. (1972). Curbside deterrence. Criminology, 10(1), 127-142.
22.
Dietrick, B. (1 977). The environment and burglary victimization in a metropolitan suburb. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
23.
Girard, P. (1960). Burglary trends and protection. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Sciences, 50(5), 517-527.
24.
Goodman, L. , Miller, T., & Deforrest, P. (1966). A study of the deterrent value of crime prevention measures as perceived by criminal offenders. Washington, DC: Bureau of Social Sciences Research.
25.
Hope, T. (1984). Building design and burglary. In R. Clarke & T. Hope (Eds.), Coping with burglary. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
26.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
27.
Kennedy, L. , & Baron, S. (1993). Routine activities and a subculture of violence: A study of violence on the street. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 88-112.
28.
Kennedy, L. , & Forde, D. (1990a). Risky lifestyles and dangerous results: Routine activities and exposure to crime. Sociology and Social Research: An International Journal, 74(4), 208-211.
29.
Kennedy, L. , & Forde, D. (1990b). Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28(1), 137-152.
30.
Letkemann, P. (1973). Crime as work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Leudtke, G. (1970). Crime and the physical city: Neighborhood design techniques and crime reduction. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
32.
Maguire, M. (1982). Burglary as opportunity. Home Office Research Bulletin, No. 10. London, England: Home Office Research and Planning Unit.
33.
Maguire, M. , & Bennett, T. (1982). Burglary in a dwelling: The offense, the offender, and the victim. London, England: Heinemann.
34.
Massey, J. , Krohn, M., & Bonati, L. (1989). Property crime and the routine activities of individuals. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26(4), 378-400.
35.
Maxfield, M. (1987a). Household composition, routine activity, and victimization: A comparative analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 301-320.
36.
Maxfield, M. G. (1987b). Lifestyle and routine activity theories of crime: Empirical studies of victimization, delinquency, and offender decision-making. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 275-282.
37.
Mayhew, P. , Clarke, R., Burrows, J., Hough, J., & Winchester, S. (1979). Crime in a public view. Home Office Research Study. London, England: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
38.
Miethe, T. , Stafford, M., & Long, J. (1987). Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. American Sociological Review, 52, 184-194.
39.
Molumby, T. (1976). Patterns of crime in a university housing project. American Behavioral Scientist, 11, 376-386.
40.
Nee, C. , & Taylor, M. (1988). Residential burglary in the Republic of Ireland: A situational perspective. Howard Journal, 27(2), 105-116.
41.
Newlands, M. (1983). Residential burglary patterns in a Vancouver neighborhood. Unpublished honor's thesis, Department of Criminology. Burnaby, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
42.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: People and design in the violent city. New York: Macmillan.
43.
Newman, O. , & Franck, K. (1980). Factors influencing crime and instability in urban housing developments. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
44.
Phelan, G. (1977). Testing academic notions of architectural design for burglary prevention: How burglars perceive cues of vulnerability in suburban housing complexes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
45.
Poyner, B. (1983). Design against crime: Beyond defensible space. London: Butter-worths.
46.
Rengert, G. (1972). Spatial aspects of criminal behavior: A suggested approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the East Lakes Division, Association of American Geographers, Geography Division, University of Temple.
47.
Rengert, G. (1981). Burglary in Philadelphia: A critique of an opportunity structure model. In P. Brantingham & P. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
Rengert, G. , & J. Wasilchick (1985). Suburban burglary: A time and a place for everything. Glencoe, IL: Thomas Books.
49.
Reppetto, T. (1974). Residential crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
50.
Roncek, D. , & Maier, P. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of "hot spots."Criminology, 29(4), 725-753.
51.
Sampson, R. , & Wooldredge, J. (1987). Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 371-393.
52.
Scarr, H. (1973). Patterns of burglary. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
53.
Sherman, L. , Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27-55.
54.
Stack, Steven (1995). The effects of temporary residences on burglary: A test of criminal opportunity theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(2), 197-214.
55.
Tunnell, K. (1992). Choosing Crime: The Criminal Calculus of Property Offenders. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
56.
Waller, I. (1976). Victim research, public policy, and criminal justice. Victimology, 1, 240-252.
57.
Waller, I. & Okihiro, N. (1978). Burglary and the public: A victimological approach to criminal justice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.
58.
Walsh, D. (1980). Break-Ins: Burglary from private houses. London: Constable.
59.
Walsh, D. (1986). Victim selection procedures among economic criminals: The rational choice perspectives. In D. Cornish & R. Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
60.
Winchester, S. , & Jackson, H. (1982). Residential burglary: The limits of prevention [Home Office Research Study No. 74]. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
61.
Wright, R. , & Decker, S. (1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
62.
Wright, R. & Logie, R. (1988). How young house burglars choose targets. Howard Journal, 27(2), 92-103.
