The Demographics of Recycling and the Structure of Environmental Behavior

Abstract

The influence of socioeconomic and demographic variables on environmentally responsible behaviors is examined. Analysis of data compiled by Statistics Canada from 43,000 households indicates that socioeconomic and demographic variables play an important role as antecedents to such behaviors. The results show that size of residential area, type of dwelling, education, and income are significant determinants of whether recycling facilities are available and used. Furthermore, having convenient access to a recycling program mediates the relationship between socioeconomic factors and recycling practice. Analyses also show that environmental behaviors are structured around specific environmental issues such as water, energy, or waste disposal and suggest that recycling may operate as a first step toward the adoption of other behaviors. The implications of these results for activists and policy makers are highlighted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Berger, I. E. , & Kanetkar, V. (1995). Increasing environmental sensitivity via workplace experiences. Joumal of Public Policy and Marketing, 14(2), 205-215.

Carson, R (1996, January 19). The greenbox program. Presentation given at Queen's University.

Davis, J. J. (1993). Strategies for environmental advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(2), 19-36.

Derksen, L. , & Gartrell, J. (1993, June). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.

DeYoung, R. (1988-1989). Exploring the difference between recyclers and nonrecyclers: The role of information. Joumal of Environmental Systems, 18, 341-351.

Dunlap, R. E. (1991). Public opinion in the 1980s-Clear consensus, ambiguous commitment. Environment, 33(8),10-37.

Dunlap, R. E. , Gallup, G. H. , & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Of global concem: Results of the health of the planet survey. Environment, 35(9), 7-39.

Dunlap, R. E. , & Scarce, R. (1991). The polls-poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 651-672.

10.

Hair, J. F., Jr. , Anderson, R. E. , Tatham, R. L. , & Grablowsky, B. J. (1984). Multivariate data analysis with readings. New York: Macmillan.

11.

Krauss, C. (1993). Women and toxic waste protests: Race, class, and gender as resources of resistance. Qualitative Sociology, 16(3), 247-262.

12.

Matas, R. (1995, October 24). Environmental protection a priority for Canadians. Globe and Mail, p. A13-A13.

13.

McIntosh, A. (1991). The impact of environmental issues on marketing and politics in the 1990s. Journal of the Market Research Society, 33(3), 205-217.

14.

Morrison, D. G. (1969). On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. Joumal of Marketing Research, 6(2), 156-163.

15.

Oskamp, S. , Harrington, M. J. , Edwards, T. C. , Sherwood, D. L. , Okuda, S. M. , & Swanson, D. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23(4), 494-519.

16.

The Roper Organization . (1993). The environment: Public attitudes and individual behavior, North America: Canada, Mexico, United States. Chicago: S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

17.

Samdahl, D. M. , & Robertson, R. (1989). Social determinants of environmental concern: Specification and model test. Environment and Behavior, 1, 57-81.

18.

Scherhom, G. (1993). Consumers' concern about the environment and its impact on business. Joumal of Consumer Policy, 16,171-191.

19.

Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

20.

Scott, D. , & Willits, F. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239-260.

21.

Taylor, D. E. (1989). Blacks and the environment: Toward an explanation of the concern and action gap between Blacks and Whites. Environment and Behavior, 21(2), 175-205.

22.

Thogersen, J. (1994). A model of recycling behaviour with evidence from Danish source separation programmes. Intemational Joumal of Research in Marketing, 11, 145-163.

23.

Van Liere, K. , & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.

24.

Vining, J. , & Ebreo, A. (1990). What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior, 229(1), 55-73.

25.

Wiener, J. L. , & Doescher, T. A. (1994). Cooperation and expectations of cooperation. Joumal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13(2), 259-270.