This study examines how the availability of nature influences the use of outdoor public spaces in two Chicago public housing developments. Ninety-six observations were collected of the presence and location of trees and the presence and location of youth and adults in semiprivate spaces at one high-rise and one low-rise public housing development. Results consistentiy indicated that natural landscaping encourages greater use of outdoor areas by residents. Spaces with trees attracted larger groups of people, as well as more mixed groups of youth and adults, than did spaces devoid of nature. In addition, more dense groupings of trees and trees that are located close to public housing buildings attracted larger groups of people. These findings suggest that natural elements such as trees promote increased opportunities for social interactions, monitorng of outdoor areas, and supervision of children in impovershed urban neighborhoods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
2.
Bacaicoa, M. , Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1996). Trees, sense of safety, andpreference in urban public housing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3.
Burby, R. J. , & Rohe, W. M. (1990). Providing for the housing needs of the elderly. Joumal of the American Planning Association, 56, 324-340.
4.
Chicago Housing Authority. (1992). Statistical profile: The Chicago Housing Authority. Unpublished manuscript.
5.
Cimprich, B. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16, 83-92.
6.
Cohen, S. , & Evans, G. W. (1987). Environmental stress. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbookofenvironmentalpsychology(Vol. 1, pp. 571-602). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Coley, R. L. , & Hoffman, L. W. (1996). Relations of parental supervision and monitoring to children's functioning in various contexts: Moderafing effects of families and neighborhoods. Joumal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17,51-68.
8.
Crowe, T. (1994). Understanding crime prevention through environmental design. Planning Commissioners Journal, 16, 5-5.
9.
Ebbesen, E. B. , Kjos, G. L., & Konecni, V. J. (1976). Spatial ecology: Its effects on the choice of friends and enemies. Joumal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(6), 505-518.
10.
Ellwood, D. , & Crane, J. (1990). Family change among Black Americans: What do we know?Joumal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 65-84.
11.
Fried, M. (1984). The structure and significance of community satisfaction. Population and Behavior, 7, 61-86.
12.
Hartig, T. , Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
13.
Holahan, C. J. (1976). Environmental effects on outdoor social behavior in a low-income urban neighborhood: A naturalistic investigation. Joumal of Applied Social Psychology, 6(1), 48-63.
14.
Ittelson, W. H. , Rivlin, L. G., & Proshansky, H. M. (1970). The use of behavioral maps in environmental psychology. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
15.
Kaplan, R. (1985). Nature at the doorstep: Residential satisfaction and the nearby environment. Joumal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2, 115-127.
16.
Kaplan, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature:Apsychologicalperspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Kaplan, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1990). Restorative experience: The healing power of nearby nature. In M. Francis & R. T. Hoster (Eds.), The meaning of gardens. Cambridge: MIT Press.
18.
Kuo, F. (1992). Inner cities and chronic mental fatigue: Design for a fighting chance. Paper presented at the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, Boulder, CO.
19.
Kuo, F. E. , Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L., & Brunson, L. (1997). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common space. Manuscript in preperation.
20.
McCormick, J. (1995, June 12). The fall of a star reformer: Feds seize Chicago housing. Newsweek,p. 31-31.
21.
Nasar, J. L. , & Fisher, B. (1993). "Hot spots" of fear and crime: A multimethod investigation. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 13,187-206.
22.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.
23.
Osmond, H. (1957). Functions as the basis of psychiatric ward design. Mental Hospitals (Architectural Supplement), 8, 23-29.
24.
Ottensmann, J. R. (1978). Social behavior in urban space: A preliminary investigation using ethnographic data. Urban Life, 7,3-22.
25.
Rapaport, A. (1975). Toward a definition of density. Environment and Behavior, 7, 133-158.
26.
Riger, S. , & Lavrakas, R J. (1981). Community ties: Pattems of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. Amercan Joumal of Community Psychology, 9,55-66.
27.
Rodin, J. (1976). Crowding, perceived choice, and response to controllable and uncontrollable outcomes. Joumal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 12, 564-578.
28.
Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 655-690). New York: John Wiley.
29.
Ulrich, R. S. , Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
30.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The trulydisadvantaged: The innercity, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Yancey, W. L. (1971). Architecture, interaction, and social control: The case of a large-scale public housing project. Environment & Behavior, 3, 3-21.
