This study examines the relationship between religion, majority-minority intergroup relations, and vernacular domestic architecture. Specifically, it looks at three facets of intergroup relations, power, status, and conflict, and their interrelationships with architecture. Through an ethnographic study focusing on the Zoroastrians, a religious minority in predominantly Muslim Iran, and their domestic architecture, we indicate how the design of the home and of the neighborhood expresses religion-related hegemonic social relations, power differentials, status distinctions, and conflict. We show that architectural features such as location, designs of houses, heights, and presence or absence of special devices, such as badgirs and "sacrificial spaces," play a part in the enaction of power, status, and conflict while forming a record of them. Architectural features can aid in the survival and preservation of a group's cultural identity, and be symbolic of resistance. We indicate how for the Zoroastrians, architecture became a means of resistance-a survival strategy-and how the home design began to incorporate fortress-like qualities to protect and preserve their unique religious identity and cultural traditions. We recommend the adoption of a socioarchitectural approach that involves simultaneous examination of both the social world and the material world, as examination of either produces an incomplete and partial picture.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Al-Hathloul, S. (1980, January-February). Urban forms in Arab-Muslim cities [extract]. Ekistics, 280,15-16.
3.
Altman, I. , & Chemers, M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4.
Amighi, J. K. (1990). The Zoroastrians of Iran: Conversion, Assimilation or Persistence. New York: AMS Press.
5.
Bavar, C. (1983). Urban form as an expression of the social structure in arid zones of Iran. In G. Golany (Ed.), Design forarid regions (pp. 55-96). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
6.
Beazeley, E. (1977). Some vernacular buildings of the Iranian plateau. Iran, 15,89-102.
7.
Becket, RH.T. (1950). Qanats of Persia. Joumal of Iranian Studies, 1, 125-133.
8.
Bonine, M. (1980). Aridity and structure: Adaptations of indigenous housing in Iran. In K. N. Clark & R Paylore (Eds.), Desert housing: Balancing experience and technology fordwelling in hotarid zones (pp. 193-220). Tucson: University of Arizona Office of Arid Lands Studies.
9.
Bourdieu, P. (1973). The Berber house. In M. Douglas (Ed.), Rules and meanings: The anthropology of everyday meanings (pp. 98-110). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
10.
Boyce, M. (1971). Zoroastrian houses of Yazd. In C. E. Bosworth (Ed.), Iran and Islam: Papers in memory of V Minorsky (pp. 125-146). New York: Bibliographic Distributors.
11.
Boyce, M. (1977). A Persian stronghold of Zoroastrianism. London: Oxford University Press.
12.
Boyce, M. (1979). Zoroastrians. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Browne, E. G. (1926/1893). A year amongst the Persians. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Campbell, J. (with Moyers, B.). (1988). The power of myth. New York: Doubleday.
15.
Castells, M. (1978). City, class and power. New York: St. Martins.
16.
Castells, M. (1977). The urban question. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Choksy, J. K. (1989). Purity and pollution in Zoroastrianism: Triumph over evil. Austin: University of Texas Press.
18.
Clark, K. N. , & Paylore, R (1980). Desert housing: Balancing experence and technology for dwelling in hot and zones. Tucson: University of Arizona Office of Arid Lands Studies.
19.
Cunningham, C. E. (1964). Order in the Atoni house. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Landen Volkenkunde, Deel 120, le Aflevering, 34-68. Koninklijk Institut voor Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde, Leiden, The Netherlands. Abridged in W. A. Lessa & E. Z. Vogt (Eds.), Reader in comparative religion: An anthropological approach (1972, pp. 116-135). New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Curzon, G. N. (1892). Persia and the Persian question. London, UK: Longmans, Green.
21.
Donley, L. W. (1982). House power: Swahili space and symbolic markers. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambrdge University Press.
22.
Donley-Reid, L. W. (1990). A structuring structure: The Swahili house. In S. Kent (Ed.), Domestic architecture and the use of space (pp. 114-126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Douglas, M. (1972). Symbolic orders in the use of domestic space. In R J. Ucko, R. Tringham, & G. W. Dimbleby (Eds.), Man, settlement and urbanism (pp. 513-521). Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
24.
Duchesne-Guillemin, J. (1966). Symbols and values in Zoroastrianism: Their survival and renewal. New York: Harper & Row.
25.
Duncan, J. S. (1976). Landscape and the communication of social identity. I n A. Rapoport (Ed.), The mutual interactions of people and their built environment (pp. 391-401). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
26.
Duncan, J. S. (1981). From container of women to status symbol: The impact of social structure on the meaning of the house. In J. S. Duncan (Ed.), Housing and identity: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 36-59). London: Croom Helm.
27.
Duncan, J. S. (1985). The house as symbol of social structure. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Ed.), Home environments. New York: Plenum.
28.
Duncan, J. S. (1989). Getting respect in the Kandyan highlands: The house, the community, and the self in a Third World society. In S. M. Low & E. Chambers (Ed.), Housing, cultureand design:Acomparativeperspective(pp. 229-252). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
Duncan, J. S. , & Duncan, N. G. (1984). A cultural analysis of urban residential landscapes in North America: The case of the anglophile elite. In J. Agnew, J. Mercer, & D. Sopher (Eds.), The city in cultural context. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
30.
Eco, U. (1973). Function and sign: Semiotics of architecture. In Via, 2, 145-145.
31.
English, R (1966). City and village in Iran: Settlement and economy in the Kirman Basin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32.
Errington, S. (1979, January-February). The cosmic house of the Buginese. Asia, 1(5), 8-14.
33.
Esber, G. (1972). Indian housing for Indians. The Kiva, 37(3), 141-147.
34.
Eyde, D. B. (1971). Spatial aspects of kinship in three cultures. Paper presented at the South Westem Anthropological Association (SWAA) Meeting, Tucson, AZ.
35.
Eyde, D. B. (1983). Some thoughts on Korean social and symbolic space. In S. Kang (Ed.), Anthropology and Korean Studies (pp. 301-316). Seongnam, Korea: Academy of Korean Studies Press.
36.
Eyde, D. B. (1984, December). Three modes in traditional Korean culture. Joumal of Korean Culture and Anthropology, 16, 125-142.
37.
Farley, R. (1977). Residential segregation in urbanized areas of the United States in 1970: An analysis of social class and racial differences. Demography, 14,497-529.
38.
Fischer, M.M.J. (1973). Zoroastrian Iran: Between myth and praxis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.
39.
Frake, C. O. (1975). How to enter a Yakan house. In M. Sanches & B. Blount (Eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use (pp. 25-40). New York: Academic Press.
40.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
41.
Giddens, A. (1979). Centralproblems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
Giddens, A. (1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism, Vol. 1: Power, property and the state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
Giddens, A. (1985). Time, space and regionalisation. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures. London: Macmillan.
44.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
45.
Golany, G. (Ed.). (1983). Design for arid regions. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
46.
Gossen, G. H. (1972). Temporal and spatial equivalents in Chamula Ritual Symbolism. In W. A. Lessa & E. Vogt (Eds.), Reader in comparative religion: An anthropological approach (pp. 135-149). New York: Harper & Row.
47.
Hall, E. T. (1969). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
48.
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
49.
Hallowell, A. I. (1977). Cultural factors in spatial orientation. In J. L. Dolgin, D. S. Kemnitzer, & M. Schneider (Eds.), Symbolic anthropology: A reader in the study of symbols and meanings (pp. 131-150). New York: Columbia University Press.
50.
Hamidullah, M. (1959). Introduction to Islam. In Publications of the Centre Culturel Islamique (Book Series 1). India and Paris: Hyderabad.
51.
Hardie, G. (1985). Continuity and change in Tswana's house and settlement form. In I. Altman & C. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. New York: Plenum.
52.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. London: Edward Amold.
53.
Highlands, D. (1990). What's indigenous? An essay on building. In M. Turan (Ed.), Vernacular architecture: Paradigms of environmental response. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
54.
Hummon, D. M. (1989). House, home, and identity in contemporary American culture. In S. M. Low & E. Chambers (Eds.), Housing, culture and design: A comparative perspective (pp. 207-228). Philadelphia: Universityof Pennsylvania Press.
55.
Karaka, D. F. (1884/1977). History of the Parsis including their manners, customs, religion, and present position. New York: AMS Press.
56.
Katzir, Y. (1982). Preservation of Jewish ethnic identity in Yemen: Segregation and integration as boundary maintenance mechanisms. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 264-279.
57.
Kent, S. (Ed.). (1990). Domestic architecture and the use of space:An interdisciplinary, cross-cultural study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Khatib-Chahidi, J. (1981). Sexual prohibitions, shared space and fictive marriages in Shi'ite Iran. In S. Ardener (Ed.), Women and space (pp. 112-135). London: Croom Helm.
59.
King, A. D. (1976). Colonial urban development: Culture, socialpowerandenvironmentLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
60.
Kramer, J. R. (1970). The American minority community. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
61.
Kulke, E. (1974). The Parsees of India. Munchen, West Germany: Weltforum Verlag.
62.
Kuper, H. (1972). The language of sites in the politics of space. AmericanAnthropologist, 74(3), 411-425.
63.
Kuper, L. , Watts, H., & Davies, R. (1961). Durban: A study in racial ecology. In G. A. Theodorson (Ed.), Studies in human ecology (pp. 304-316). Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
64.
Lawrence, D. L. (1988). Suburbanization of house form and gender relations in a rural Portuguese agro town. Architecture and Behavior, 4(3), 197-212.
65.
Lawrence, D. L. , & Low, S. M. (1990). The built environment and spatial form. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19,453-505.
66.
Lawrence, R. J. (1982). Domestic space and society: A cross cultural study. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 24(1), 104-130.
67.
Lawrence, R. J. (1983). The comparative analyses of homes: Research method and application. Social science information, 22(3), 461-485.
68.
Lawrence, R. J. (1985). A more humane history of houses: Research method and application. In I. Altman & C. Werner (Eds.), Home Environments (pp. 112-132). New York: Plenum.
69.
Leach, E. (1976). The symbolic ordering of the man-made world: Boundaries of social space and time. In E. Leach (Ed.), Culture and communication: The logic by which symbols are connected: An introduction to the use of structuralist analysis in social anthropology (pp. 33-36). London: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Lindholm, C. (1986). Social structure and symbolic space: A case from Nagaland. In J. W. Carswell & D. G. Saile (Ed.), Purposes in built form and culture research (pp. 63-65). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Department of Archeology.
71.
Lipman, A. , Cooper, I., Harris, R., & Tranter, R. (1978). Power: A neglected concept in office design. Joumal of Architectural Research, 6(3), 28-37.
72.
Littlejohn, J. (1967). Myth and cosmos: Readings in mythologyandsymbolism (pp. 331-348). Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
73.
Littlejohn, J. (1963, January). Temne space. Anthropological Quarterly, 36(1), 1-17.
74.
Malcolm, N. (1905/1892). Five years in Persian town. London: John Murray.
75.
Masani, R. (1968). Zoroastrianism: The religion of the good life. New York: Macmillan.
76.
Massey, D. S. (1979). Residential segregation of Spanish Americans in United States urbanized areas. Demography, 16, 653-664.
77.
Massey, D. S. , & Denton, N. A. (1987, December). Segregation of Blacks, Hispanics and Asians 1970-1980. American Sociological Review, 52(6), 802-825.
78.
Mazumdar, S. (1981). Control and cities: Some examples from Iran. Master's thesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT, School of Architecture and Planning.
79.
Mazumdar, S. (1986). Corporate image making through architecture: Media iconographics. In T. Dutton (Ed.), Icons of late capitalism corporations and theirarchitecture (pp. 30-34). Oxford, OH: Miami University.
80.
Mazumdar, S. (1988). Organizational culture and physical environments: A study of corporate head offices. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT School of Architecture and Planning.
81.
Mazumdar, S. (1992, January). How programming can become counterproductive: An analysis of approaches to programming. Joumal of Environmental Psychology, 12(1), 65-91.
82.
Mazumdar, S. (1993). Toward making the architect-Sociologist collaboration work. In M. Fazio & J. Lombard (Eds.), Proceedings of the 81st meeting of ACSA (pp. 225-230). Washington, DC: Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Press.
83.
Mazumdar, S. (1995). Even the moon has a dark side: A critical look at vemacular architecture. In J. K. Edwards (Ed.), 83rd ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings (pp. 128-134). Washington, DC: Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Press.
84.
Mazumdar, S. , & Mazumdar, S. (1994, Spring). Societal values and architecture: A socio-physical model of the interrelationships. Joumal of Architectural and Planning Research, 11(1), 66-90.
85.
Mazumdar, S. , & Mazumdar, S. (in press). Religious traditions and domestic architecture: A comparative analysis of Zoroastrian and Islamic houses in Iran. Joumal of Architectural and Planning Research.
86.
McHenry, P. G. (1980). Adobe comes full circle. In K. N. Clark & P. Paylore. Desert housing: Balancing expenence andtechnologyfordwelling in hotarid zones(p. 115-115). Tucson: University of Arizona, Office of Arid Lands Studies.
87.
Moholy-Nagy, S. (1957). Native genius in anonymous architecture. New York: Horizon.
88.
Murzban, M. (1917). The Parsis of India. Madras, India: Modem Pnnting.
89.
Nanavutty, P. (1977). The Parsis. New Delhi: National Book Trust.
90.
Nariman, G. K. (Ed.). (1925). Persia and the Parsis II. Bombay, India: Iran League.
91.
Nyrop, R. F. (1978). Iran: A country study. Washington, DC: American University Press.
92.
Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1972). Spatial concepts of the Ainu of the northwest coast of southem Sakhalin. American Anthropologist, 72, 426-457.
93.
Olgyay, V. , & Olgyay, A. (1963). Design with climate bioclimatic approaches to architectural regionalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
94.
Ong, A. (1987). Spirits of resistance. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
95.
Papanek, H. (1982). Purdah: Separate worlds and symbolic shelter. In H. Papanek & G. Minault (Eds.), Separate worlds: Studies of Purdah in South Asia (pp. 3-53). Delhi, India: Chanakya.
96.
Park, R. , Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
97.
Peach, C. , & Smith, S. (1981). Introduction. In C. Peach, V. Robinson, & S. Smith (Eds.), Ethnic segregation in cities (pp. 9-22). London: Croom Helm.
98.
Pearce, D. (1988). Minorities and housing discrimination. In E. Huttman & W. van Vliet-(Eds.), Handbook of housing and the built environment in the United States. New York: Greenwood.
99.
Pearce, D. (1979). Gatekeepers and homeseekers: Individual and institutional factors in racial steering. Social Problems, 26, 325-342.
100.
Pellow, D. (1988). What housing does: Changes in an Accra community. Architecture and Behavior, 4(3), 213-228.
101.
Prussin, L. (1969). Architecture of Northem Ghana: A study of forns and functions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
102.
Rapoport, A. (1969a). House form and culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
103.
Rapoport, A. (1969b). The Pueblo and the Hogan: A cross cultural comparison of two responses to an environment. In R Oliver (Ed.), Shelter and society (pp. 66-79). London: Barne & Radcliffe.
104.
Rapoport, A. (1976). The mutual interaction of people and their built environmentChicago: Aldine.
105.
Rapoport, A. (1980). Vemacular architecture and the cultural determinants of form. In A. D. King (Ed.), Buildings and society: Essays on the social development of the built environment. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
106.
Rapoport, A. (1981). Identity and environment: Across-cultural perspective. In D. James (Ed.), Housing and identity: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 6-35). London: Croom Helm.
107.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the builtenvironment:A non-verbal communication approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
108.
Rivlin, L. G. (1982). Group membership and place meaning in an urban neighborhood. Joumal of Social Issues, 38, 75-94.
109.
Rodman, M. C. (1985, October). Contemporary custom: Redefining domestic space in Longana, Vanuatu. Ethnology, XXIV(4), 269-279.
110.
Rudofsky, R (1964). Architecture without architects. New York: Doubleday.
111.
Ruesch, J. , & Kees, W. (1966). Nonverbal communication. Berkeley: University of Califomia Press.
112.
Saegert, S. (1985). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling. In I. Altman and C. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. New York: Plenum.
113.
Saile, D. G. (1985). The ritual establishment of home. In I. Altman & C. Werner (Ed.), Home environments (pp. 87-111). New York: Plenum.
114.
Samizay, R. , & Kazimee, B. (1991). Life in between residential walls in islamic cities. In J. Hancock & W. Miller (Eds.), Architecture... back... to... life... (pp. 98-105). Washington, DC: Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Press.
115.
Schacht, J. (1964). Introduction to Islamic law. London: Oxford University Press.
116.
Stokols, D. S. (1990, May). Instrumental and spiritual views of people-environment relations. American Psychologist, 45(5), 641-646.
117.
Swithenbank, M. (1969). Ashanti fetish houses. Accra, Ghana: Ghana University Press.
118.
Sykes, E. (1898). Through Persia on a side saddle. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott.
119.
Sykes, R M. (1902). Ten thousand miles in Persia or eight years in Iran. London: John Murray.
120.
Tambiah, S. (1969, October). Animals are good to think and good to prohibit. Ethnology, 8(4), 424-459. (Also as: Classification of Animals in Thailand. In M. Douglas, Ed., 1972, Rules and meanings, pp. 127-166. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.)
121.
Tavassoli, M. (1983). City planning in the hot, dry climate of Iran. In G. Golany (Ed.), Design for arid regions. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
122.
Tuan, Y. (1974).Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenfice-Hall.
123.
Von Grunebaum, G. E. (1961). Islam: Essays in the nature and growth of a cultural tradition. New York: Bames & Noble.
124.
Warren, J. & Fethi, I. (1982). Traditional houses in Baghdad. Horsham, UK: Coach.
125.
Watt, M. (1968).Islamic political thought the basic concepts. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
126.
Yetman, N. R. (Ed.). (1991). Majority and minority: The dynamics of race and ethnicity in American life. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
127.
Yinger, J. (1977). Prejudice and discrimination in the urban housing market. Discussion Paper D-77-9:1977, Department of City and Regional Planning, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
