The personality of the polar sojoumer has been of interest to psychologists for a number of years. Using the NEO Five Factor Inventory, this study examined the general personality factors of the polar worker compared to a normative populaffon, and how these factors differ according to the worker's occupational classification and the polar region in which he or she is working. It was found that polar workers scored higher than a normative group on all factors except Neuroticism. Comparisons across occu pational groups showed that scientists were lower than military personnel on Extra version and lower than technicaVsupport staff on Agreeableness and Conscientious ness. The analysis by polar region indicated that Antarctic workers were higher than Arctic personnel on Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. A group of Italian Antarctic personnel, completing a translated form of the NEO-FFI, scored lower than the rest of the polar groups on all factors. These findings are discussed in light of various features of the polar environment and Gunderson's 3-predictor model of polar adaptability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonovsky, A. A. (1987). Unraveling the mysteries of health. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
2.
Barabasz, A. F. (1991). Areview of Antarctic research. In A. A. Harrison, Y A. Clearwater, & C. P. McKay (Eds.), From Antarctica to outer space: Life in isolation and confinement (pp. 21-31). New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
Blackburn, A. B. , Shurley, J. T., & Natani, K. (1974). Psychological adjustment at a small Antarctic station: An MMPI study. In O. G. Edholm & E. K. E. Gunderson (Eds.), Polar human biology (pp. 369-383). Chicago: William Heinemann.
4.
Bundzen, P. V. (1971). Urgent tasks of psychophysiological studies in the Antarctic. In A. L. Matusov (Ed.), Arkticheskii i antarkticheskii nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut [Medical research on arctc and antarctic expeditions]. Original work translated by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations, 1973, TT 72-50004.
5.
Butcher, J. N. , & Ryan, M. (1974). Personality stability and adjustment to an extreme environment. Joumal of Applied Psychology, 59, 107-109.
6.
Cherry-Garrard, A. (1989/1922). The worst joumey in the world. New York: Carroll & Graf.
7.
Coan, R. W. (1974). The optimal personality. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
Costa, P. T., Jr. , & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9.
Costa, P. T., Jr. , & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10.
Crocq, L. , Rivolier, J., & Cazes, G. (1974). Selection psychologique des personnels de l'Antarctique (II) [Psychological selection of Antarctic personnel (II)]. M6decine et Arm6es, 2, 393-408.
11.
Fitzgerald, E. T. (1966). Measurement of openness to experience: A study of regression in the service of the ego. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 655-663.
12.
Glogower, F. (August, 1987). Personality and adjustment in isolation and confinement. In A. A. Harrison & M. M. Connors (Chairs), The human experience in Antarctica: Application to life in space. Symposium conducted in Sunnyvale, CA.
13.
Gunderson, E.K.E. (1973). Individual behavior in confined or isolated groups. In J. E. Rasmussen (Ed.), Man in isolation and confinement (pp. 145-164). Chicago: Aldine.
14.
Gunderson, E.K.E. , & Nelson, R D. (1965). Biographical predictors of performance in an extreme environment. Joumal of Psychology, 61, 59-67.
15.
Gunderson, E.K.E. , & Nelson, R D. (1966). Criterion measures of extremely isolated groups. Personnel Psychology, 19, 67-90.
16.
Leon, G. R. (1991). Individual and group process characteristics of polar expedition teams. Environment and Behavior, 23, 723-748.
17.
Leon, G. R. , Kanfer, R., Hoffman, R. G., & Dupre, L. (1994). Group process and task effectiveness in a Soviet-American expedition team. Environment and Behavior, 26, 140-165.
18.
Leon, G. R. , McNally, C., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1989). Personality characteristics, mood, and coping patterns in a successful North Pole expedifionary team. Joumal of Research in Personality, 23, 162-179.
19.
Maki Kahn, P. , & Leon, G. R. (1994). Group climate and individual functioning in an all-women Antarctic expedition team. Environment and Behavior, 26, 669-697.
20.
Mocellin, J.S.R (1988). A behavioural study of human responses to the Arctic and Antarctic environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertafion, University of British Columbia.
21.
Mocellin, J.S.R , & Suedfeld, R (1991). Voices from the ice: Diaries of polar explorers. Environment and Behavior, 23, 704-722.
22.
Oliver, D. (1991). Psychological effects of isolation and confinement of a winterover group at McMurdo Station, Antarctica. In A. A. Harrison, Y. A. Clearwater, & C. R McKay (Eds.), From Antarctica to outer space: Life in isolation and confinement (pp. 217-229). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23.
Owens, A. G. (1 966a). Assessment of individual perfornance in small Antarctic groups. Part 1. OIC's rating scales. Australian Army 1 Psychological Research Unit Report, August 1966; No. 3/66.
24.
Owens, A. G. (1 966b). Assessment of individual performance in smallAntarctic groups. Part 2. Ratings on the Leary Interpersonal Checklist. Australian Army 1 Psychological Research Unit Report, August 1967; No. 9/67.
25.
Palinkas, L. A. (1991). Effects of physical and social environments on the health and well-being of Antarctic winter-over personnel. Environment and Behavior, 23, 782-799.
26.
Paterson, R. A. H. (1978). Personality profiles in a group of Antarctic men. Revue Intemationale de Psychologie Appliqu6e, 27,33-37.
27.
Rothblum, E. D. , Morris, J. F., & Weinstock, J. S. (1995). Women in the Antarctic: Risk-taking and social consequences. World Psychology, 1, 83-112.
28.
Snyder, M. , & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Special fields and applications (pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
29.
Suedfeld, P. (1991). Polar psychology: An overview. Environment and Behavior, 23, 653-665.
30.
Suedfeld, R , Bernaldez, J. R, & Stossel, D. L. (1989). The Polar Psychology Project: A cross-national investigation of polar adaptation. Arctic Medical Research, 48,91-94.
31.
Taylor, A.J.W. (1968). Professional isolates in New Zealand's Antarctic Research Programme. Intemational Review of Applied Psychology, 18,135-138.
32.
Taylor, A.J.W. (1969). Ability, stability, and social adjustment among Scott Base personnel, Antarctica. Occupational Psychology, 43, 81-93.
33.
Taylor, A.J.W. (1973). The adaptation of New Zealand research personnel in the Antarctic. In O. G. Edholm & E.K.E. Gunderson (Eds.), Polar human biology: Proceedings of the SCAR/IUPS/IUBS symposium on human biology and medicine in the Antarctic (pp. 417-429). Chicago: William Heinemann.
Taylor, A.J.W. (1985). The selection of people for work in polar regions: New Zealand and the Antarctic. NewZealand Antarctic Record, 6, 26-39.
36.
Taylor, A.J.W. (1987). Antarctic psychology. Wellington, NZ: DSIR Science Information Publishing Centre.
37.
Tellegen, A. , & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ('absorption'), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Joumal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268-277.
38.
Tracy, M. (1987). Personality profiles and expectations of social climate in Antarctica. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Sacramento, CA.
