This article presents findings of a research carried out in a barrio of Caracas, which aimed at determining the meaning assigned to the houses by their inhabitants. In-depth interviews were conducted with male and female members of the barrio. Results show that the dwelling unit is not conceived separately from its surroundings and neighbors, and its meanings have varied along its transformation from a precarious shack into a consolidated brick house. Three stages corresponding to the building process were identified-initial construction, improvement, and consolidation-each corresponding to the conceptualization of the dwelling as rancho, house, and home, respectively. In addition, the transformation of houses-as a process parallel to both the consolidation of the barrio and the development of a sense of community among its members-grants the house special environmental, psychological, and social meanings and creates great concern in regard to the politics aimed at eradicating rancho neighborhoods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amerigo, M. (1994). Satisfacción residential. Evaluación de la calidad residencial desde una perspective psicosocial. In E. Wiesenfeld (Ed.), Contribuciones iberoamencanas a la psicologia ambiental. Caracas, Venezuela: Comisión de Estudios de Postgrado, Facultad de Humanidades y Educación, U.C.V.
2.
Amerigo, M. , & Aragones, J. I. (1990). Residential satisfaction in council housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 313-325.
3.
Anthony, K. (1984). Moving experiences: Memories of favorite homes. In D. Dwerk & D. Campbell (Eds.), The challenge of diversity: Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association (ERDA) conference (Vol. 15, p. 141). Washington, DC: ERDA.
4.
Bachelard, G. (1969). The poetics of space. Boston: Beacon.
Bogdan, R. , & Taylor, S. J. (1986). IntroducciOn a los mètodos cualitativos de investigacion. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Brown, B. , & Perkins, D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. Human Behavior and Environment. Advances in theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 279-304), New York: Plenum.
8.
Bruner, J. (1991). Actos de significado. M&s alld de la revolution cognitive. Espafia, Madrid: Editorial Alianza.
9.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
10.
Canter, D. (1984). The purposive evaluation of places: A facet approach. Environment & Behavior, 15, 659-698.
11.
Connery, C. , & Marans, R. (1985). Comparing two global measures of perceived neighborhood quality. Social Indicators Research, 17, 29-47.
12.
Cooper-Marcus, C. (1972). The house as a symbol of self. Design and Environment, 3, 30-37.
13.
Cooper-Marcus, C. (1979). The house as a symbol of self. In J. Lang, C. Bumette, W. Moloski, & D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior: Architecture in behavioral sciences (pp. 130-146). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, & Ross.
14.
Cooper-Marcus, C. (1992). Environmental memories. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. Human Behavior and Environment. Advances in theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 87-112). New York: Plenum.
15.
Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelesness. In I. Altman & C. Weiner (Eds.), Home Environments (pp. 33-64). New York: Plenum.
16.
Dovey, K. , Downtown, P., & Missingham, G. (1985). Place and placemaking. In Proceedings of the PAPER 85 Conference (pp. 93-110). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT.
17.
Fried, M. (1982). Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction. Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 107-120.
18.
Fuhrer, U. (1990). Bridging the ecological-psychological gap: Behavior settings as interfaces. Environment & Behavior, 22, 518-537.
Galster, G. , & Hesser, G. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment & Behavior, 13(6), 735-759.
21.
García, I., & Giuliani, F. (1992). La noción de comunidady el sentido de comunidad en un barrio caraquefio. Undergraduate thesis, Escuela de Psicologia, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.
22.
García, I. , Giuliani, F., & Wiesenfeld, E. (1994). La noción de comunidad y el sentido de comunidad en un barrio caraquenio. In M. Montero (Ed.), La psicologia social comunitaria: Teoriaymétodo (pp. 75-101). Mexico: Ediciones de la Universidad de Guadalajara.
23.
Gergen, K. (1985). Social constructionist inquiry: Contextand implications. In K. Gergen & K. Davis (Eds.), The social construction of the person (pp. 3-18). New York: Springer-Verlag.
24.
Guba, E. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-30). London: Sage.
25.
Harre, R. (1989). La construcción social de la mente: La relación intima entre el lenguaje y la interacción social. In T. lbafiez (Ed.), El conocimiento de la realidad social (pp. 39-52). Barcelona: Sendai Editores.
26.
Hayward, G. (1977). Psychological concepts of home among urban middle class families with young children. Unpublished thesis, City University of New York.
27.
Hummon, D. (1992). Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. Human Behavior and Environment Advances in theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 253-278). New York: Plenum.
28.
Ibanez, T. (1989). La psicologia social como dispositivo desconstruccionista. In T. Ibanez (Ed.), El conocimiento de la realidad social (pp. 109-133). Barcelona: Sendai Editores.
29.
Jimenez, B. (1994). Villas de San Juan: Satisfacción residential y vivienda de interns social en Guadalajara. In E. Wiesenfeld (Ed.), Contribuciones iberoamericanas a la psicologia ambiental. Caracas, Venezuela: Comisión de Estudios de Postgrado, Facultad de Humanidades y Educación, U.C.V.
30.
Kliksberg, B. (1993). La escalada de la pobreza en Amnerca Latina. In B. Kliksberg (Ed.), Pobreza: Un tema impostergable. Nuevas respuestas a nivel mundial (pp. 7-12). Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
31.
Lalli, M. (1992). Urban related identity: History, measurement and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 285-304.
32.
Lincoln, I. (1992). Sympathetic connections between qualitative methods and health research. Qualitative Health Research, 2, 375-391.
33.
Lincoln, I. (1993, July 4-9). Emergent paradigms and the crisis in psychology. Conference presented in the XXIV Interamerican Congress of Psychology, Santiago de Chile.
34.
Lincoln, I. , & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Low, S. , & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment. Human Behavior and Environment. Advances in theory and research (Vol. 12, pp. 1-12). New York: Plenum.
36.
MacMillan, D. , & Chavis, D. (1986). Sense of community: Adefinition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
37.
Martin Frechilla, J. (1989). La urbanización y la vivienda de los sectores de mds bajos ingresos en la construction de ciudades en Venezuela. Coloquio Vivienda, 1, 125-142.
38.
Montero M. (1979). Relación entre tipo de vivienda, deterioro y clase social percibida. Psicologla, 6(2-3), 125-134.
39.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space. New York: Macmillan.
40.
Pennartz, P. (1986). Atmosphere at home: A qualitative approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(2), 135-153.
41.
Proshansky, H. M. , Fabian, A., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83.
42.
Proshansky, H. , Nelson-Shulman, Y., & Kaminoff, R. (1979). The role of physical settings in life crisis experiences. In I. Sharon & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 6). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
43.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
44.
Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(609).
45.
Ruibal, H. (1993). La comunidad urbana y la vivienda productive. Sugerencias para el desarrollo de actividades productivas como eje del mejoramiento de los asentamientos urbanos pobres. In B. Kliksberg (Ed.), Como enfrentar la pobreza? Buenos Aires, Argentina: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
46.
Saegert, S. (1985). The androgenous city: From critique to praxis. Sociological Focus, 8(2), 161-175.
47.
Saegert, S. (1986). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling. In I. Altman & C. Wemer (Eds.), Home environments (pp. 287-307). New York: Plenum.
48.
Schneider, G. (1986). Psychological identity of and identification with urban neighbor-hoods. In D. Frick (Ed.), The quality of urban life (pp. 204-218). Berlin: De Gruyter.
49.
Segre, R., & Lopez, R. (1986). Ambientey sociedaden America Latin acontempordnea. La Habana, Cuba: Casa de las Americas, Colección Nuestros parses, Serie Estudio.
50.
Sixsmith, J. (1986). The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 281-298.
51.
Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 655-678). New York: John Wiley.
52.
Tuan, Y. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
53.
Tuan, Y. (1980). Rootedness versus sense of place. Landscape, 4, 3-8.
54.
Turner, J. , & Fishter, R. (1976). Liberfadpara construir. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
55.
Varady, D. (1986). Neighborhood confidence: A critical factor in neighborhood revitalization. Environment & Behavior, 18, 480-501.
56.
Weidemann, S. , & Anderson, J. (1986). Aconceptual framework for residential satisfaction. In I. Altman & C. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. New York: Plenum.
57.
Wiesenfeld, E. (1990). La evaluación psicosocial de la vivienda: El caso de la Urbanización Jose Felix Ribas. Boletin de la AVEPSO, 13,4.
58.
Wiesenfeld, E. (1992). Public housing evaluation in Venezuela: A case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 213-223.
59.
Wiesenfeld, E. (1994). La vivienda en pobladores de bajo ingreso. Propuestas para el estudio de su significado. In B. Hernandez, J. Martinez, & E. Suarez (Ed.), Psicologia ambientaly responsabilidadecológica (pp. 69-81). Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Espafia: Departarnento de Psicologia y Sociologfa, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canada.
60.
Wiesenfeld, E. (1995, July 6). From homeless to homeowner and community member. The dialectic between invasion and eviction. Paper presented in the XXV Interamerican Congress of Psychology, San Juan.
61.
Wiesenfeld, E. (in press). La construcción del significado del barrio: Una aproximación psicosocial. Revista de AVEPSO.
