Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An experiment is reported that assessed aspects of a constructivist model of environmental experience, using examples of high- and popular-style, single, detached houses. Of interest was the relationship between measures of typicality and familiarity and affective experience, as well as how this relationship was affected by examples from different cultural/geographic locations. Also investigated were similarities and differences between architecture students at the beginning of their education, architecture students part way through their first year, and students from the general university population. Systematic relationships were found between the judgments of typicality and familiarity and affective judgments. Similarities and differences were related to the cultural/geographic origin of examples. No difference was found between architecture students at different stages of their university work, but both groups were dearly different from their nonarchitecture colleagues. These results are discussed in the context of the constructivist model of environmental experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appleton, J. H. (1990). The symbolism of habitat. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Billington, R. , Strawbridge, S. , Greensides, L. , & Fitzsimons, A. (1991). Culture and society: A sociology of culture. London: Macmillan.

Boyd, R. (1968). Australia's home. Victoria, Australia: Penguin.

Devlin, K. , & Nasar, J. L. (1989). The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of "high" versus "popular" residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 333-344.

Gans, H. J. (1978). Towards a human architecture: A sociological view of the profession. Journal of Architectural Education, 2, 28-31.

Gaver, W. W. , & Mandler, G. (1987). Play it again, Sam: On liking music. Cognition and Emotion, 1(3), 259-282.

Hildebrand, G. (1991). The Wright space: Pattern and meaning in Frank Lloyd Wright's houses. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Humphrey, N. (1973). The illusion of beauty. Perception, 2, 429-439.

Kaplan, R. , & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Kaplan, S. (1987). Aestheftcs, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3-32.

11.

Kaplan, S. , & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment. New York: Praeger.

12.

Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.

13.

Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: Norton.

14.

Munsinger, H. , & Kessen, W. (1964). Uncertainty, stre, and preference. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78(9), 1-24.

15.

Purcell, A. T. (1986). Environmental perception and affect: A scherna discrepancy model. Environment and Behavior, 18, 3-30.

16.

Purcell, A. T. (1987). The relationship between buildings and behaviour. Building and Environment, 22, 215-232.

17.

Purcell, A. T. (1992). Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of the landscape. Journal of Environmental Management, 34, 159-177.

18.

Purcell, A. T. , & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Experiencing other peoples houses: A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 199-211.

19.

Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference of the International Association for People-Environment Studies, University of Thessaloniki, Greece (Vol. 2, pp. 289-293).

20.

Rosch, E. , & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.

Experiencing American and Australian High-and Popular-Style Houses

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References