Professional homework, that is, performing paid labor out of one's home, provides an opportunity to examine the spatial, temporal, behavioral, and social boundaries individuals create to manage role conflict and role overlap. Interviews were conducted with 104 homeworkers, and inventories of their homes were completed. Although there is considerable reported role overlap between work and domestic/leisure activities, this overlap does not necessarily lead to role conflict. Rescheduling work activities, maintaining a separate workspace, restricting access to the workspace, relocating activities outside the home, and eliminating and starting new activities are particular adjustments homeworkers make to minimize or avoid role conflict. An agenda for future work based on this exploratory study is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahrentzen, S. (1987). Blurring boundaries: Socio-spatial consequences of working at home (Research Report). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Architectural and Planning Research.
2.
Albertson, L. A. (1977). Telecommunications as a travel substitute: Some psychological, organizational and social aspects. Journal of Communication, 27(2), 32-43.
3.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4.
Antonoff, M. (1985). The push for telecommuting. Personal Computing, 9, 82-85.
5.
Baruch, G. K. , Biener, L., & Barnett, R. C. (1987). Women and gender in research on work and family stress. American Psychologist, 42(2), 130-136.
6.
Beach, B. (1989). Integrating work and family life: The home & working family. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Becker, F. D. (1986). Loosely-coupled settings: A strategy for computer-aided work decentralization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 199-231.
8.
Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67-92.
9.
Board of Telecommunications and Computer Applications, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council . (1985). Office workstations in the home. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
10.
Boxer, M. H. (1982). Women in industrial homework: The flowermakers of Paris in the Belle Epoque. French Historical Studies, 12(3), 401-423.
11.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Christensen, K. E. (1985). Impacts of computer mediated home-based work on women and their families.New York: City University of New York, Center for Human Environments.
13.
Christensen, K. (1988). Women and home-based work. New York: Henry Holt.
14.
Cott, N. (1977). The bonds of womanhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Dubin, R. (1976). Work in modern society. In R. Dubin (Ed.), Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 5-36). Chicago: Rand McNally.
16.
Duffy, F. (1969). Role and status in the office. Architectural Association Quarterly, 1(4), 4-14.
17.
Gersten, N. , & Gross, H. E. (Eds.). (1987). Families and work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
18.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of seff in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor/ Doubleday.
19.
Goode, W. J. (1974). A theory of strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496.
20.
Kabanoff, B. (1980). Work and non-work: A review of models, methods, and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 60-77.
21.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A criticalreviewandagenda for research and policy. New York: Russell Sage.
22.
Kelly, J. (1979). The doubled vision of feminist theory: A postscript to the "Women and Power" conference. Feminist Studies, 5(1),216-228.
23.
Klein, B. , & Froschle, H. (1988). Decentralization via teletex: Organizational and technical impact. In W. B. Korte, S. Robinson, & W. J. Steinle (Eds.), Telework: Present situation and future development of a new form of work organization. North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
24.
Lamb, L. (1987, November/December). Don't get around much anymore. Utne Reader, No. 24, pp. 11-12.
25.
Lennard, S. H. , & Lennard, H. L. (1977).Architecture: Effect of territory, boundary and orientation on family functioning. Family Process, 16(1), 49-68.
26.
Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain. American Sociological Review, 39, 567-578.
27.
McLaughlin, M. M. (1981). Physical and social support systems used by women engaged in home-based work. Unpublished master's thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
28.
Nilles, J. , Carlson, S., Gray, P., & Nannemen, G. (1976). The telecommunications-transportation trade off. New York: Wiley.
29.
Nunnally, J. C. (1970). Introduction to psychologicalmeasurement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Olson, M. H. (1983). Overview of work-at-home trends in the United States (Working paper CRIS, No. 57). New York University, Center for Research on Information Systems.
31.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
32.
Pleck, J. H. , Staines, G. L., & Lang, L. (1980, March). Conflicts between work and family life. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 29-31.
33.
Sales, E. , Shore, B. K., & Bolitho, F. (1980). When mothers return to school: A study of women completing an MSW program. Journal of Education and Social Work,16,57-65.
34.
Sieber, J. (1974). Towards a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review,39, 567-578.
35.
Sims, H. P. , Szilagyi, A. D., & Keller, R. (1975). The measurement of job characteristics.Academy of Management Joumal,19, 195-212.
36.
Tilly, L. A. , & Scott, J. W. (1978). Women, work, and family. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
37.
Toffler, A. (1983). The third wave. New York: William Worrow.
38.
Van Sell, M. , Brief, A. P., & Schuler, R. S. (1981). Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research. Human Relations,34, 43-71.
39.
Vanek, J. (1980). Work, leisure and family roles: Farm households in the United States, 1920-1955. Journal of Family History,5, 422-431.
40.
Voydanoff, P. (Ed.). (1984). Work and family: Changing roles of men and women. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
