An Arousal Optimization Model of Lighting Level Preferences

Abstract

Both the lighting level of a setting and the social situation can affect arousal. If individuals attempt to maintain an optimal arousal level, then preferred lighting levels for a particular setting should vary with social variables. The purpose of this study was to examine this hypothesis. Male and female subjects (N = 105) were presented with 48 hypothetical situations and were asked to indicate their lighting level preferences for each. Some of the situations involved activities requiring a high degree of visual attention, while the other situations involved activities of a nonvisual nature. Activities were crossed with a social variable: a platonic friend present, a romantic partner present, or a group of platonic friends present. Across all activities, brightness preferences for the romantic partner situations were significantly lower than preferences for either the platonic friend situations or the group of friends situations. The effect of the social situation was very strong for nonvisual activities, but it was considerably weakened for visual activities. Also, brightness preferences were lower for situations with a group of friends than with one friend, but only for complex tasks. The results are consistent with arousal optimization theory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ALTMAN, I. (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

BERLYNE, D. E. (1970) "Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value." Perception and Psychophysics B: 279-286.

BERLYNE, D. E. (1971) Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

BINER, P. M. and D. L. BUTLER (1987) "Normativesettingsand setting behaviors of college students: A new methodological approach." Paper presented at the 59th annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

BOND, C. F. and L. J. TITUS (1983) "Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies." Psych. Bull. 94: 265-292.

BUTLER, D. L. and P. M. BINER (1987) "Preferred lighting levels: variability among settings, behaviors, and individuals." Environment & Behavior, 19(6): 695-721.

COTTRELL, N. B. (1972) "Social facilitation," in C. G. McClintock (ed.) Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

EPSTEIN, Y. (1981) "Crowding, stress, and human behavior." J. of Social Issues 37:126-145.

FESTINGER, L. , A. PEPITONE , and T. NEWCOMB (1952) "Some consequences of deindividuation in a group." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47: 382-389.

10.

GEEN, R. G. and J. J. GANGE (1977) "Drive theory of social facilitation: twelve years of theory and research." Psych. Bull. 84: 1267-1288:

11.

GERGEN, K. J. , M. M. GERGEN , and W. H. BARTON (1973) "Deviance in the dark." Psychology Today 7(5): 129-130.

12.

GUERIN, B. and J. M. INNES (1982) "Social facilitation and social monitoring: a new look at Zajonc's mere presence hypothesis." British J. of Social Psychology 21: 7-18.

13.

HEBB, D. O. (1955) "Drives and the CNS." Psych. Rev. 62: 243-254.

14.

MARTENS, R. (1969) "Palmar sweating and the presence of an audience." J. of Experimental Social Psychology 5: 371-374.

15.

MATLIN, M. W. and R. B. ZAJONC (1968) "Social facilitation of word associations." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 10: 455-460.

16.

MEHRABIAN, A. (1976) Public Places and Private Spaces. New York: Basic Books.

17.

MILGRAM, S. (1970) "The experience of living in cities." Science 167:1461-1468.

18.

MOORE, D. L. and R. S. BARON (1984) "Social facilitation: a psychophysical analysis," in J. Cacioppi and R. Petty (eds.) Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford.

19.

REISENZEIN, R. (1983) "The Schacter theory of emotion: two decades later." Psych. Bull. 94: 239-264.

20.

SCHACTER, S. (1964) "The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state," in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

21.

SCHNEIRLA, T. C. (1959) "An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal," in M. R. Jones (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.

22.

WALSTER, E. and G. W. WALSTER (1978) A New Look at Love. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

23.

WANKEL, L. M. (1977) "Audience size and trait anxiety effects upon state anxiety and motor performance." Research Q. 48:181-186.

24.

ZAJONC, R. B. (1966) Social Psychology: An Experimental Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

25.

ZAJONC, R. B. and S. M. SALES (1966) "Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses." J. of Experimental Social Psychology 2: 160-168.

26.

ZIMBARDO, P. G. (1970) "The human choice: individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos," in W. J. Arnold and D. Levine (eds.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.