Stalking the Urban Pedestrian

Abstract

Behavioral mapping in unrestricted, outdoor environments raises methodological challenges which have led several environmental behavior researchers to employ questionnaires rather than behavioral observation as the usual method of data collection. This study provides an empirically-grounded comparison of both techniques for recovering data on routes selected by pedestrians as they engage in unrestricted travel from place to place in an urban environment. Mid-trip interception tracking provides expensive but accurate data on partial trips whereas questionnaires provide more easily obtainable data on complete trips but with a lesser degree of accuracy. The reduced level of accuracy for questionnaire data is mild, however, and may be tolerable given the specific aims and resources of a particular investigation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BECHTEL, R. (1967), "Human movement in architecture," pp. 642-645 in H. M. Proshansky et al., (eds.) Environmental Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.

BLIVICE, S. (1974), Pedestrian Route Choice: A Study of Walking to Work in Munich. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

GARBRECHT, D. (1971), "Pedestrian paths through a uniform environment," Town Planning Review, 41, 1 (January): 71-84.

HARTENSTEIN, W. and H. R. IBLHER (1967), "Visitors' records: a method for analyzing the flow of people in the C.B.D.," pp. 497-502 in University of Amsterdam Sociological Department (eds.) Urban Core and Inner City. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

HILL, M. R. (Forthcoming) "Walking straight home from school: pedestrian route choice by young children." Transportation Research Record.

HILL, M. R. (Forthcoming) Walking, Crossing Streets, and Choosing Pedestrian Routes: A Survey of Recent Insights from the Social/Behavioral Sciences. University of Nebraska Studies, new series no. 66. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln.

HILL, M. R. (1978) "Pedestrians, priorities, and spatial games," pp. 126-136 in S. Weidemann and J. R. Anderson (eds.) Priorities for Environmental Design Research. Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.

HILL, M. R. and T. T. ROEMER (1977), "Toward an explanation of jaywalking behavior: a linear regression approach." Man-Environment Systems 7: 342-349.

ITTELSON, W. H. , L. G. RIVLIN , and H. M. PROSHANSKY (1970), "The use of behavioral maps in environmental psychology," pp. 658-668 in H. M. Proshansky , et al., (eds.), Environmental Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.

10.

LAUTSO, K. and P. MUROLE (1974), "Study of pedestrian traffic in Helsinki: methods and results." Traffic Engineering and Control 15, 9: 446-449.

11.

MARCHAND, B. (1974), "Pedestrian traffic planning and the perception of the urban environment: a French example."Environment and Planning (Series A) 6: 491-507.

12.

PUSHKAREV, B. S. and J. M. ZUPAN (1975) Urban Space for Pedestrians. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

RUSSELL, J. et al. (1976), "Informational properties of jaywalking models as determinants of imitated jaywalking: An extension to model, sex, race, and number." Sociometry 39, No. 3 (September): 270-273.

14.

WEISS, R. and S. BOUTOURLINE (1962), Fairs, Exhibits, Pavilions and Their Audiences. (mimeo)

15.

WINKEL, G. and R. SASANOFF (1966), "An approach to an objective analysis of behavior in architectural space," pp. 619-631 in H. M. Proshansky , et al., (eds.), Environmental Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.