Psychoanalytic object relations theory and symbolic interactionism both emphasize the mediating role of representations in the socialization process, yet the relationship between the external environment and the constitution of these representations is quite different in the two approaches. The inherent subjectivism of the Freudian tradition is criticized through an examination of the role of personal possessions in the objectification of the self. Valued material possessions, it is argued, act as signs of the self that are essential in theirown right for its continued cultivation, and hence the world of meaning that we create for ourselves, and that creates our selves, extends literally into the objective surroundings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARLOW, J. (1980) "Object concept and object choice."Psychoanalytic Q.49:109-133.
2.
BARTES, R. (1968) Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill & Wang.
3.
BASCH, M. (1980) Doing Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BASCH, M. (1976) "Theory formation in chapter VII: a critique."J. of Amer. Psychiatric Assn.24: 61-100.
5.
BAUDRILLARD, J. (1981) For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis, MO: Telos.
6.
BENTHAM, J. (1948) The Principles of Morals and Legislation. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
BERNSTEIN, R. (1967) John Dewey. New York: Washington Square Press.
8.
CHAPIN, F. S. (1935) Contemporary American Institutions. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
COOLEY, C. H. (1964) Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Schocken.
10.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. and E. ROCHBERG-HALTON (1981) The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
11.
DAVIS, J. A. (1955) "Living rooms as symbols of social status: a study in social judgement." Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
12.
DEWEY, J. (1954) The Public and Its Problems (1929)Chicago: Swallow.
13.
DEWEY, J. (1896) "The reflex arc concept in psychology."Psych. Rev.3 (July): 357-370.
14.
DEWEY, J. and A. F. BENTLEY (1975) Knowing and the Known (1949). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
15.
DOWNS, R. M. and D. STEA (1973) "Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: process and products," in R. M. Downs and D. Stea (eds.) Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
DUNCAN, J. S. [ed.] (1982) Housing and Identity: Cross-cultural Perspectives. New York: Holmes and Meier.
17.
ECO, U. (1976) A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
18.
FAIRBAIRN, W. R. (1954) An Object Relations Theory of Personality. New York: Basic Books.
19.
FREUD, S. (1962) The Interpretation of Dreams (1900). New York: Avon.
20.
FREUD, S. (1962) Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905). New York: Avon.
21.
FREUD, S. (1953) The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (1901). London: Hogarth.
22.
GEERTZ, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
23.
GEHLEN, A. (1980) Man in the Age of Technology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
24.
GOFFMAN, E. M. (1949) "Some characteristics of response to depicted experience." Master's thesis, University of Chicago.
25.
HABERMAS, J. (1973) Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon.
26.
HULL, C. (1952) A Behavior System. New Haven, Cl: Yale Univ. Press.
27.
JUN KER, B. (1954) "Room compositions and life styles: a sociological study in living rooms and other rooms in contemporary dwellings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
28.
KAPLAN, S. (1976) "Adaptation, structure, and knowledge," in G. T. Moore and R. G. Golledge (eds.) Environmental Knowing. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Inc.
29.
KERNBERG, O. F. (1980) Internal World and External Reality: Object Relations Applied. New York: J. Aronson.
30.
KERNBERG, O. F. (1976) Object-Relations Theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis. New York: J. Aronson.
31.
KOHUT, H. (1977) The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Universities.
32.
KOHUT, H. (1971) The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities.
33.
KRON, J. (1983) Home Psych: The Social Psychology of Home and Decoration. New York: Clarkson N. Potter, Inc.
34.
KUIPERS, B. (1982) "The'map in the head' metaphor."Environment and Behavior14: 202-220.
35.
LAUMANN, E. O. and J. S. HOUSE (1970) "Living room styles and social attributes: the patterning of material artifacts in a modern urban community."Sociology and Social Research54: 321-342.
36.
LYNCH, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
MARX, K. (1976) The Marx-Engels Reader. Second edition, Robert C. Tucker (ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
38.
MEAD, G. H. (1938) The Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
39.
MEAD, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
40.
ORLEANS, P. (1973) "Differential cognition of urban residents: effects of social scale on mapping," in R. M. Downs and D. Stea (eds.) Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.
41.
PEIRCE, C. S. (1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 7-8, A. W. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
42.
PEIRCE, C. S. (1931-1935) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1-6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
43.
RICOUER, P. (1978) The Philosophy of Paul Ricouer. C. Reagan and D. Stewart (eds.). Boston: Beacon.
44.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. (1983) "Culture considered as cultivation." (unpublished)
45.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. (1982a) "Situation, structure, and the context of meaning."Soc. Q.23: 455-476.
46.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. (1982b) "Qualitative immediacy and the communicative act."Qualitative Sociology5: 162-181.
47.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. (1980) "Where is the self? a semiotic and pragmatic theory of self and environment." Presented at the 1980 Annual American Sociological Association Meeting.
48.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. (1979a) "The meaning of personal art objects," in J. Zuzanek (ed.) Social Research and Cultural Policy. Waterloo: Otium Publications.
49.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. (1979b) Cultural Signs and Urban Adaptation: The Meaning of Cherished Household Possessions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
50.
ROCHBERG-HALTON, E. and K. McMURTREY (1983) "The foundations of modern semiotic: Charles Peirce and Charles Morris."Amer. J. of Semiotics2: 129-156.
51.
SCHORSKE, C. (1980) Fin-de-Sibcle Vienna. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
52.
SCHUTZ, A. (1970) "The homecomer," in H. R. Wagner(ed.) Alfred Schutz on Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
53.
SINGER, M. (1980) "Signs of the self: an exploration in semiotic anthropology."Amer. Anthropologist82: 485-507.
54.
SINGER, M. (1968) "Culture."International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.
55.
STEA, D. and J. M. BLAUT (1973) "Notes toward a developmental theory of spatial learning," in R. M. Downs and D. Stea (eds.) Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.
56.
STOKOLS, D. (1983) "Environmental psychology: a coming of age," in A. Kraut (ed.) G. Stanley Hall Lectures, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57.
STOKOLS, D. (1978) "Environmental psychology."Annual Rev. of Psychology29: 253-295.
58.
TOLMAN, E. C. (1973) "Cognitive maps in rats and men," in R. M. Downs and D. Stea (eds.) Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.
59.
STOKOLS, D. (1961) "A summary discussion of purposive behavior," in T. Parsons et al. (eds.) Theories of Society. New York: Free Press.
60.
WINNICOTT, D. W. (1958) "Transitional objects and transitional phenomena" (1951). D. W. Winnicott Collected Papers. New York: Basic Books.
