A multivariate, purposive model of the experience of places is offered as a theoretical basis for place evaluation. This model suggests a structure to the evaluation of places that may be generalizable across most settings. The structure derives from the definition of place evaluation as the degree to which a person sees a place as helping to achieve that person's goals at various levels of interaction with that place. In order to test empirically this framework, use is made of the facet approach to theory specification and hypothesis testing. Smallest Space analyses of two large scale questionnaire surveys, one of housing satisfaction and the other of hospital ward design, provide strong support for the purposive model. Implications of this multivariate model for future evaluations are discussed, together with the value of harnessing the facet approach to aid the development of evaluation theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BARKER, R. G. (1963) "On the nature of the environment."J. of Social Issues19: 17-34.
2.
BORG, I. (1978) "Some Basic Concepts of Facet Theory," in J. C. Lingoes (ed.) Geometrical Representation of Relational Data: Readings in Multidimensional Scaling. Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press.
3.
B.P.R.U. (1972) Building Performance. London: Applied Science.
4.
BROMLEY, D. B. (1977) Personality Description in Ordinary Language. London: Wiley.
5.
CANTER, D. (1977) The Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.
6.
CANTER, D. (1977a) "Children in hospital: A facet theory approach to person/place synomorphy."J. of Architectural Research6(2): 20-32.
7.
CANTER, D.(1979) "Y a t-il Des Lois d'Interaction Environmentales?" Presented to 4th IAAP, Louvain.
8.
CANTER, D. (1982) "Facet approach to applied research."Perceptual and Motor Skills55:143-154.
9.
CANTER, D. (1983) "Putting situations in their place," in A. Furnham (ed.) Social Behavior in Context.
10.
CANTER, D. (1983a) "The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology."Quality and Quality17: 75-67.
11.
CANTER, D. and AMBROSE, I. (1981) "Prison Design and Use."Univ. of Surrey: Guildford.
12.
CANTER, D. and WALKER, E. (1980) "Environmental role and conceptualizations of housing."J. of Architectural Research7: 30-35.
13.
CANTER, D. and KENNY, C. (1981) "The multivariate structure of design evaluation."Multi. Behav. Res.16: 215-236.
14.
CANTER, D. and REES, K. (1982) "A multivariate model of housing satisfaction."International Rev. of Applied Psychology31: 185-208.
15.
CRAIK, K. H. and APPLEYARD, D. (1981) "Streets of San Francisco: Brunswick's Lens Model applied to urban inference and assessment."Berkeley: IPAR.
16.
CRAIK, K. H. and ZUBE, E. H. (1976) Perceiving Environmental Quality. New York: Plenum Press.
17.
DEGERMAN, R. L. (1972) "The geometric representation of some simple structures," in R. N. Shepard et al. (eds.) Multidimensional Scaling: Vol. 1, Theory. New York: Seminar Press.
18.
DONALD, I. (1983) The Multivariate Structure of Office Evaluation. Unpublished M.Sc. dissertation, University of Surrey.
19.
DOWNS, R. M. and STEA, D. [eds.] (1973) Image and Environment. Chicago: Aldine.
20.
FRIEDMAN, A. , ZIMRING, C., and ZUBE, E. (1978) Environmental Design Evaluation. New York: Plenum.
21.
GUTTMAN, L. (1957) "Empirical verification of the radex structure of mental abilities and personality traits."Educational Psych. Measurement17:391-407.
22.
GUTTMAN, L. (1965) "A Faceted definition of intelligence," in Studies in Psychology. Jerusalem: Hebrew Univ. Scripts Hierosolymitana 14: 166-181.
23.
GUTTMAN, L. (1968) "A General non-metric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points."Psychometrika33: 469-506.
24.
KENNY, C. and CANTER, D. (1981) "Multivariate structure of nurses evaluations of hospital wards."J. of Occupational Psychology.
25.
LAZARUS, R. S. (1966) Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
26.
LEFF, H. L. (1978) Experience, Environment and Human Potential. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
27.
LEVY, S. (1981) "Lawful roles of facets in social theories," in I. Borg (ed.) Multi-dimensional Data Representations: When and Why. Ann Arbor, Ml: Mathesis Press.
28.
LEVY-LEBOYER, C. (1978) Etude Psychologique Du Cadre De Vie Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
29.
LEWIN, K. (1951) "Field Theory in Social Science," in Social Science Paperbacks, Dorwin Cartwright, ed.
30.
LINGOES, J. C. (1973) The Guttman-Lingoes Non-metric Program Series. Ann Arbor, Ml: Mathesis Press.
31.
MARANS, R. W. and SPRECKELMEYER, K. F. (1981). Evaluating Built Environments: A Behavioral Approach. Survey Research Center: Univ. of Michigan.
32.
RAPOPORT, A. (1977) Human Aspects of Urban Form. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
33.
RELPH, E. (1976) Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
34.
RUSSELL, J. A. and WARD, L. M. (1982) "Environmental psychology."Annual Review of Psychology33: 651-688.
35.
SEAMON, D. (1979) A Geography of the Lifeworld. London: Pion.
36.
SHAPIRA, Z. and ZEVULUN, E. (1978) On the Use of Facet Analysis in Organizational Behavior Research: Some Conceptual Considerations and an Example. Working Paper No. 10: 78-79. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon Univ.
37.
SHYE, S. [ed.] (1978) Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavioural Sciences. London: Jossey-Bass.
38.
STOKOLS, D. (1976) "The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments."Environment and Behavior8: 49-86.
39.
STOKOLS, D. (1978) Environmental Psychology."Annual Review of Psychology29: 253-295.
40.
STOKOLS, D. (1979) "A congruence analysis of stress," in I. Sarason and C. Spielberger (eds.) Stress and Anxiety, Vol 6. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.
41.
STOKOLS, D. and SHUMAKER, S. A. (1981) "People in place: A transactional view of settings," in J. H. Harvey (ed.) Cognition, Social Behavior and the Environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
TOLLMIN, S. E. (1958) The Uses of Argument. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
43.
WOHLWILL, J. F. (1973) "The environment is not in the head," in W.F.E. Preiser (ed.) EDRA 4 Philadelphia, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross.
