Between-subject differences in age, gender and residential experience were found to contribute significantly to differences in landscape preference ratings. When 283 subjects rated five vegetational biomes, preferences changed through the life cycle, with the highest preferences shown by young children and the lowest by elderly subjects; preference diverged in adolescence for males and females and for urban and rural residents. Preferences were highest for the most familiar biome. No evidence was found to support the hypothesis that landscape preference is shaped by innate or evolutionarily determined factors. These findings suggest that the development of landscape preference is a cumulative process sensitive to socially differentiating factors. In the study of landscape preference it is necessary to identify both the physical aspects of the landscape as well as the social and demographic characteristics of the subjects in order to identify the sources of variation in preference.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDERSON, T. W. , E. H. ZUBE, and W. P. MacCONNELL (1976) "Predicting scenic resource values," in E. H. Zube (ed.) Studies in Landscape Perception. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
2.
BALLING, J. and J. FALK (1982) "Development of visual preference for natural landscapes."Environment and Behavior14: 5-28.
3.
BEVINS, M. and D. WILCOX (1980) "Evaluation of nationwide outdoor recreation participation surveys, 1959-1978."Burlington: University of Vermont.
4.
BURCH, W. R., Jr. (1977) "Urban children and nature: a summary of research on camp and outdoor recreation," in Children, Nature and the Urban Environment. Upper Darby, PA: USDA Forest Service Technical Report NE-30.
5.
BURCH, W. R., Jr. , N. H. CHEEK, and L. TAYLOR [eds.] (1972) Social Behavior, Natural Resources and Environment. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (1972) The 1972 Survey of Outdoor Recreation Activities (mimeo).
7.
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (1962) The 1962 Survey of Outdoor Recreation Activities (mimeo).
8.
CALVIN, J. S. , J. A. DEARINGER, and M. C. CURTIN (1972) "An attempt at assessing preference for national landscapes."Environment and Behavior4: 447-470.
9.
CAVALLI-SFORZA, L. L. and M. W. FELDMAN (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
10.
CHEEK, N. H. (1972) "Variations in patterns of leisure behavior: an analysis of sociological aggregates," in W. R. Burch et al. (eds.) Social Behavior, Natural Resources and Environment. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
CHEMERS, M. and I. ALTMAN (1977) "Use and perception of the environment: cultural and developmental processes," in Children, Nature and the Urban Environment. Upper Darby, PA: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-30.
12.
COUGHLIN, R. E. and K. A. GOLDSTEIN (1970) The Extentof AgreementAmong Observers on Environmental Attractiveness. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.
13.
CRAIK, K. H. (1972) "Psychological factors in landscapeappraisal."Environment and Behavior4: 255-266.
14.
DANIEL, T. C. and R. S. BOSTER (1976) Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The SBE Method. Boulder, CO: USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167.
15.
DRIVER, B. L. and P. GREENE (1977) "Man's nature: innate determinants of response to natural environments," in Children, Nature and the Urban Environment. Upper Darby, PA: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-30.
16.
DUNCAN, J. S. (1973) "Landscape taste as a symbol of group identity."Geographic Rev.63: 344-355.
17.
ELSNER, G. H. and R. C. SMARDON [eds.] (1979) Our National Landscapes: Proceedings of a Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource. Berkeley, CA: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-35.
18.
HECHT, M. (1975) "The decline of the grass lawn tradition in Tucson."Landscape19: 3-10.
19.
HERZOG, T. S. , S. KAPLAN, and R. KAPLAN (1976) "The prediction of preference for familiar urban places."Environment and Behavior8: 627-645.
20.
KAPLAN, S. (1976) "Adaptation, structure and knowledge," in G. T. Moore and R. Golledge (eds.) Environmental Knowing: Theories, Research and Methods. Stroudsberg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
21.
KAPLAN, S. (1972) "The challenge of environmental psychology: a proposal for a new functionalism."Amer. Psychologist27: 140-143.
22.
KELLERT, S. R. (1978) "Perceptions of animals in American society," pp. 533-546 in The 41st North American Wildlife Conference Proceedings.
23.
KELLERT, S. R. and J. K. BERRY (1980) Phase Ill: Knowledge, Affection and Basic Attitudes Toward Animals in American Society. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Research Report.
24.
LOWENTHAL, D. [ed.] (1967) Environmental Perception and Behavior. Chicago: American Geographic Society.
25.
LUKASHOK, A. and K. LYNCH (1973) "Some childhood memories of the city," in J. Gabree (ed.) Surviving the City. New York: Ballantine.
26.
LYONS, E. E. (1979) "Social correlates of landscape preference." Honors thesis, Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
27.
MACIA, A. (1979) "Visual perception of landscape: sex and personality differences," in G. H. Eisner and R. C. Smardon (eds.) Our National Landscape. Berkeley, CA: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-35.
28.
MILLER, P. and M. RUTZ (1980) "A comparison of scenic preference dimensions for children and adults." Presented at the annual meetings of the Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, Madison, WI.
29.
MOORE, G. T. (1979) "Knowing about environmental knowing: the current state of theory and research on environmental cognition."Environmental and Behavior11: 33-70.
30.
PETERSON, G. C. (1977) "Recreational preferences of urban teenagers: the influence of cultural and environmental attributes," in Children, Nature and the Urban Environment. Upper Darby, PA: USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-30.
31.
RABINOWITZ, C. and R. E. CCUGHLIN (1970) Analysis of Landscape Characteristics Relevant to Preference. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.
32.
SHAFER, E. L. (1969) "Perception of the natural environment."Environment and Behavior1: 71-82.
33.
SONNEFELD, J. (1967) "Environmental perception and adaptation level in the Arctic," pp. 42-59 in D. Lowenthal (ed.) Environmental Perception and Behavior. Chcago: American Geographic Society.
34.
TUAN, Y. F. (1974) Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
ULRICH, R. S. (1977) "Visual landscape preference: a model and applications."Man-Environment Systems7: 279-293.
36.
WEINSTEIN, N. (1976) "The statistical prediction of environmental preferences."Environment and Behavior8: 511-525.
37.
ZUBE, E. H. [ed.] (1976) Studies in Landscape Perception. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
38.
ZUBE, E. H. [ed.] (1974) "Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources."Environment and Behavior6: 69-89.
39.
ZUBE, E. H. [ed.], D. G. PITT, and T. W. ANDERSON (1974) Perception and Measurement of Scenic Resources in the Connecticut River Valley. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
