Human visual preferences for slides of five natural landscapes or biomes-tropical rain forest, temperate deciduous forest, coniferous forest, savanna, and desert-were examined. Subjects were third graders, sixth graders, ninth graders, college students, adults, senior citizens, and a group of professional foresters. A series of 20 slides, 4 examples of each biome, was shown twice to each group of subjects. On one pass through the slides, subjects judged how much they would like to live in an area similar to the one represented; on the other pass, subjects rated the slides for how much they would like to visit an area similar to the one shown. Judgments were made on a 6-point Likert scale. Elementary schoolchildren showed a significant preference for savanna over all other biomes. From midadolescence and through adulthood, more familiar natural environments were equally preferred to savanna. Results were interpreted as providing limited support for the hypothesis that humans have an innate preference for savanna-like settings that arises from their long evolutionary history on the savannas of East Africa.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
APPLETON, J. (1975) The Experience of Landscape. New York: John Wiley.
2.
BROTHERTON, I. (1979) "Prospect-refuge theory: is it hazardous?"Landscape Research4, 3: 13, 16.
3.
BUTZER, K. W. (1977) "Environment, culture, and human evolution."Amer. Scientist65: 572-584.
4.
CICCHETTI, C. J. (1972) "A multivariate statistical analysis of wilderness users in the United States," pp. 142-170 in J. V. Krutilla (ed.) Natural Environments: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Analysis. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5.
DANIEL, T. C. and R. S. BOSTER (1976) Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper RM-1 67. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
6.
DRIVER, B. L. and P. GREENE (1977) "Man's nature: innate determinants of response to natural environments," pp. 63-70 in Children, Nature, and the Urban Environment: Proceedings of a Symposium-Fair. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-30. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
7.
Forest Service (1973) National Forest Landscape Management, Vol. 1 (Agriculture Handbook 434). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
8.
HAMMITT, W. E. (1979) "Measuring familiarity for natural environments through visual images," pp. 217-226 in Proceedings of Our National Landscape: A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report PSW-35. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
9.
HELSON, H. (1964) Adaptation Level Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
HENDEE, J. C. , W. R. CATTON, Jr., L. D. MARLOW, and C. F. BROCKMAN (1968) Wilderness Users in the Pacific Northwest-Their Characteristics, Values, and Management Preferences. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper PNW-61.
11.
KAPLAN, R. (1977) "Preference and everyday nature: method and application," in D. Stokols (ed.) Psychological Perspectives on Environment and Behavior: Theory, Research and Application. New York: Plenum.
12.
KAPLAN, S. (1976) "Adaptation, structure and knowledge," pp. 32-45 in G. T. Moore and R. G. Golledge (eds.) Environmental Knowing: Theories, Research, and Methods. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross.
13.
KAPLAN, S. (1973) "Cognitive maps in perception and thought," pp. 63-78 in R. Downs and D. Stea (eds.) Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
KAPLAN, S. (1972) "The challenge of environmental psychology: a proposal for a new functionalism."Amer. Psychologist27: 140-143.
15.
KAPLAN, S. , R. KAPLAN, and J. S. WENDT (1972) "Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material."Perception and Psychophysics12, 4: 354-356.
16.
KLOPFER, P. H. (1969) Habitats and Territories. New York: Basic Books.
17.
LEAKEY, R.E.F. (1976) "Hominids in Africa."Amer. Scientist64, 2: 174-178.
18.
LEAKEY, R.E.F. and A. C. WALKER (1976) "Australopithecus, Homo erectus and the single species hypothesis."Nature261: 572-574.
19.
LINGOES, J. C. (1967) "Non-metric factor analysis: a rank-reducing alternative to linear factor analysis."Multivariate Behavioral Research2: 485-505.
20.
McHARG, I. L. (1969) Design and Nature. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
21.
MYERS, J. L. (1972) Fundamentals of Experimental Design. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
PARTRIDGE, L. (1978) "Habitat selection," pp. 351-376 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.) Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
23.
PARTRIDGE, L. (1976) "Field and laboratory observation on the foraging and feeding techniques of blue tits and coal tits in relation to their habitats."Animal Behavior24: 534-544.
24.
PILBEARN, D. (1972) The Ascent of Man. An Introduction to Human Evolution. New York: MacMillan.
25.
RABINOWITZ, C. B. and R. E. COUGHLIN (1970) "Analysis of landscape characteristics relevant to preference."Regional Science Research Institute Discussion Paper Series38 (March).
26.
ULRICH, R. S. (1977) "Visual landscape preference: a model and application."Man-Environment Systems7: 279-293.
27.
WECKER, S. C. (1963) "The role of early experience in habitat selection by the prairie deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatis bairdi."Ecological Monographs33, 4: 307-325.
28.
ZAJONC, R. B. (1968) "Attitudinal effects of mere exposure."J. of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement9: 1-27.
29.
ZUBE, E. H. (1974) "Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description of evaluation of landscape resources."Environment and Behavior61: 69-89.
30.
ZUBE, E. H. , D. G. PITT, and T. W. ANDERSON (1974) Perception and Measurement of Scenic Resources in The Southern Connecticut River Valley. Amherst: Institute for Man and his Environment, University of Massachusetts.
