Research on human density has indicated that how people perceive a high-density situation strongly influences their behavior, and that density itself rarely has a direct unmediated effect on human behavior. The purposes of the present study were to (1) determine if there are individual differences in the perception of density, (2) clarify the nature of these individual differences if they exist, and (3) assess the dimensions underlying people's perceptions of situations of varying density. Subjects (n = 30) made pairwise similarity judgments of 12 neutral-secondary situations (Stokols, 1976) which varied on type of activity, group size, and spatial density. A Tucker and Messick (1963) approach to multidimensional scaling revealed sizable individual differences in perception of the situations. Three groupings of subjects were identified. Each grouping was similar in that the two major dimensions underlying perceptions were Spatial Constraint and Social Constraint. The major difference between groups of subjects was the relative emphasis assigned to the two dimensions. Results were discussed in the context of an interactionist perspective on density research, and the practical importance of the findings was considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALTMAN, I. (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
BAUM, A. and S. KOMAN (1976) "Differential response to crowding: psychological effects of social and spatial density."J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 526-536.
3.
BAUM, A. and S. VAUNS (1973) "Residential environments, group size and crowding."Proceedings of the Eighty-First Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, 211-212.
4.
BAUM, A. , R. E. HARPIN, and S. VALINS (1975) "The role of group phenomena in the experience of crowding."Environment and Behavior7: 185-198.
5.
BOWER, K. S. (1973) "Situationism in psychology: an analysis and a critique."Psych. Rev.80: 307-336.
6.
CALHOUN, J. B. (1962) "Population density and social pathology."Scientific American206: 139-148.
7.
COZBY, P. C. (1973) "Effects of density, activity and personality on environmental preferences."J. of Research in Personality7: 45-60.
8.
DAVIS, D. E. (1971) "Physiological effects of continued crowding," in A. H. Esser (ed.) Behavior and Environment. New York: Plenum.
9.
DESOR, J. A. (1972) "Toward a psychological theory of crowding."J. of Personality and Social Psychology21: 79-83.
10.
EKEHAMMAR, B. and D. MAGNUSSON (1973) "A method to study stressful situations."J. of Personality and Social Psychology27: 176-179.
11.
EPSTEIN, Y. M. and R. A. KARLIN (1975) "Effects of acute experimental crowding."J. of Applied Social Psychology5: 34-53.
12.
FREEDMAN, J. L. (1975) Crowding and Behavior. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
13.
FREEDMAN, J. L. , S. KLEVANSKY, and P. EHRLICH (1971) "The effect of crowding on human task performance."J. of Applied Social Psychology1: 7-25.
14.
GLASS, D. and J. SINGER (1972) Urban Stress. New York: Academic.
15.
GRIFFITT, W. and R. VEITCH (1971) "Hot and crowded: influences of population density and temperature on interpersonal affective behavior."J. of Personality and Social Psychology17: 92-98.
16.
HAYDUK, L. A. (1978) "Personal space: an evaluative and orienting review."Psych. Bull.85: 117-134.
17.
HELLER, J. F. , B. D. GROFF, and S. H. SOLOMON (1977) "Toward an understanding of crowding: the role of physical interaction."J. of Personality and Social Psychology35: 183-190.
18.
JACKSON, D. N. and S. MESSICK (1963) "Individual differences in social perception."British J. of Social and Clinical Psychology2: 1-10.
19.
JACOBS, J. (1961) The Death and Life of American Cities. New York: Vintage.
20.
JORDE, L. B. and J. N. SPUHLER (1974) "A statistical analysis of selected aspects of primate demography, ecology and social behavior."J. of Anthro. Research30: 199-224.
21.
KELLY, G. A. (1955) A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
22.
KRUSKAL, J. B. (1964) "Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis."Psychometrika29: 1-27.
23.
LANGER, E. J. and S. SAEGERT (1977) "Crowding and cognitive control."J. of Personality and Social Psychology35: 175-182.
24.
LOO, C. M. (1977) "Beyond the effects of crowding: Situational and individual differences," in D. Stockols (ed.) Perspective on Environment and Behavior. New York: Plenum.
25.
LOO, C. M. (1973) "Important issues in research the effects of crowding on humans."Representative Research in Social Psychology4: 219-226.
26.
MILLER, S. and R. M. NARDINI (1977) "Individual differences in the perception of crowding."Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior2: 3-13.
27.
PROSHANSKY, H. M. , W. H. ITTELSON, and L. G. RIVLIN (1970) "Freedom of choice and behavior in a physical setting," in H. M. Proshanskyet al. (eds.) Environmental Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28.
RAPOPORT, A. (1975) "Toward a redefinition of density."Environment and Behavior7: 133-158.
29.
ROSS, M. , B. LAYTON, B. ERICKSON, and J. SCHOPLER (1973) "Affect, facial regard and reactions to crowding."J. of Personality and Social Psychology28: 69-76.
30.
SCHIAVO, S. (1977) "Family use of the environment, related psychological experiences and evaluation of environmental features." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
31.
SCHOPLER, J. , C. E. RUSBOLT, and R. McCALLUM (1977) "Conceptual dimensions of crowding: a multidimensional scaling analysis." Presented at the symposium on Human Consequences of Crowding, Antalya, Turkey.
32.
SETA, J. J. , P. B. PAULUS, and J. K. SCHKADE (1976) "Effects of group size and proximity under cooperative and competitive conditions."J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 47-53.
33.
SHERROD, D. R. (1974) "Crowding, perceived control and behavioral aftereffects."J. of Applied Social Psychology4: 171-186.
34.
SOMMER, R. (1974) Tight Spaces: Hard Architecture and How to Humanize It. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35.
STOKOLS, D. (1977) "Origins and directions of environment-behavioral research," in D. Stokols (ed.) Perspectives on Environment and Behavior. New York: Plenum.
36.
STOKOLS, D. (1976) "The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments."Environment and Behavior8: 49-86.
37.
SUNDSTROM, E. (1975) "An experimental study of crowding: effects of room size, intrusion and goal blocking on nonverbal behavior, self-disclosure and self-reported stress."J. of Personality and Social Psychology32: 645-659.
38.
TAYLOR, R. B. and R. R. STOUGH (forthcoming) "Territorial cognition: assessing Altman's typology."J. of Personality and Social Psychology.
39.
TORGERSON, W. S. (1965) "Multidimensional scaling of similarity."Psychometrika30: 379-393.
40.
TUCKER, L. R. and S. MESSICK (1963) "An Individual differences model for multidimensional scaling."Psychometrika28: 333-367.
41.
VERBRUGGE, L. M. and R. B. TAYLOR (1976) "Consequences of population density: testing new hypotheses." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
42.
WORCHEL, S. and C. TEDDLIE (1976) "The experience of crowding: a two factor theory."J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 30-40.
