The previous literature on the socioeconomic correlates of environmental concern places great stress on the middle class being more supportive of environmental agendas than the working or lower socioeconomic class. We argue that certain methodological problems in this research and the theoretical implications of the proenvironmental middle-class generalization warrant an empirical reconsideration. We then find that social class indicators explain relatively little variance in environmental attitudes accounted for by "class." However, education is not related to environmental beliefs in an unambiguous linear fashion. Education is subordinate to age as a predictor of environmental attitudes, and much of the gross effect of education is the spurious result of the generally high educational backgrounds of young adults. We conclude by discussing the implications of our research for sociology of environmental problems theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ALBRECHT, S. L. (1972) "Environmental social movements and counter-movements: an overview and an illustration."J. of Voluntary Action Research1 (October): 2-11.
2.
BARBER, B. (1957) Social Stratification. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
3.
BLAU, P. M. and O. D. DUNCAN (1967) The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley.
4.
BURCH, W. R., Jr. (1971) "The peregrine falcon and the urban poor: some socio-logical interrelations." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Denver, August.
5.
BUTTEL, F. H. and W. L. FLINN (1974) "The structure of support for the environmental movement, 1968-1970."Rural Sociology39 (Spring): 56-69.
6.
CAPLOW, T. (1964) The Sociology of Work. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
CONSTANTINI, E. and K. HANF (1972) "Environmental concern and Lake Tahoe: a study of elite perceptions, backgrounds, and attitudes."Environment and Behavior4 (June): 209-242.
8.
DEUTSCH, S. and D. VAN HOUTEN (1974) "Environmental sociology and the American working class."Humboldt J. of Social Relations2 (Fall/Winter): 22-26.
9.
DEVALL, W. B. (1970) "Conservation: an upper-middle class social movement: a replication."J. of Leisure Research2 (Spring): 123-126.
10.
DILLMAN, D. A. and J. A. CHRISTENSON (1972) "The public value for pollution control," pp. 237-256 in W. R. Burch, Jr., et al. (eds.) Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
DUNLAP, R. E. (1975) "The socioeconomic basis of the environmental movement: old data, new data, and implications for the movement's future." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.
12.
DUNLAP, R. E. and R. P. GALE (1972) "Politics and ecology: a political profile of student eco-activists."Youth and Society3 (June): 379-397.
13.
DUNLAP, R. E. and W. B. HEFFERNAN (1975) "Outdoor recreation and environmental concern."Rural Sociology40 (Spring): 18-30.
14.
ENGLAND, R. and B. BLUESTONE (1973) "Ecology and social conflict," pp. 190-214 in H. E. Daly (ed.) Toward a Steady-State Economy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
15.
FAICH, R. G. and R. P. GALE (1971) "The environmental movement: from recreation to politics."Pacific Soc. Rev.14 (July): 270-287.
16.
FLACKS, R. (1971) Youth and Social Change. Chicago: Markham.
17.
GALE, R. P. (1972) "From sit-in to hike-in: a comparison of the civil rights and environmental movements," pp. 280-305 in W. R. Burch, Jr., et al. (eds.) Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
GIDDENS, A. (1973) The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. New York: Barnes & Noble.
19.
HAMILTON, R. F. (1972) Class and Politics in the United States. New York: John Wi ley.
20.
HARDESTY, J. , N. C. CLEMENT, and C. E. JENKS (1971) "The political economy of environmental destruction," pp. 85-106 in W. A. Johnson and J. Hardesty (eds.) Economic Growth vs. the Environment. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21.
HARRY, J. , R. P. GALE, and J. C. HENDEE (1971) "Reply to McEvoy: organized conservationists are upper-middle class."J. of Leisure Research3 (Spring): 129-131.
22.
HARRY, J. , R. P. GALE, and J. C. HENDEE (1969) "Conservation: an upper-middle class social movement."J. of Leisure Research1 (Summer): 246-254.
23.
HENDEE, J. C. , R. P. GALE, and W. R. CATTON, Jr. (1971) "A typology of outdoor recreation activity preferences."J. of Environmental Educ.3 (Fall): 28-34.
24.
HENDEE, J. C. , R. P. GALE, and J. HARRY (1969) "Conservation, politics, and democracy."J. of Soil and Water Conservation24 (November/December): 212-215.
25.
HENDEE, J. C. , W. R. CATTON, Jr., L. MARLOW, and C. F. BROCKMAN (1968) "Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest-their characteristics, values, and management preferences."Portland, OR: U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper PNW-61.
26.
HORNBACK, K. E. (1974) "Orbits of opinion: the role of age in the environmental movement's attentive public, 1968-1972." Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Michigan State University. (unpublished)
27.
HORTON, J. (1966) "Order and conflict theories of social problems as competing ideologies."Amer. J. of Sociology73 (May): 701-713.
28.
KRIEGER, M. H. (1970) "Six propositions on the poor and pollution."Policy Sciences1: 311-324.
29.
MARTINSON, O. B. and E. A. WILKENING (1975) "A scale to measure awareness of environmental problems: structure and correlates." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago, April.
30.
MORRISON, D. E. (1973) "The environmental movement: conflict dynamics."J. of Voluntary Action Research2 (Spring): 74-85.
31.
MORRISON, D. E. , K.E. HORNBACK, and W. K. WARNER (1972) "The environmental movement: some preliminary observations and predictions," pp. 259-279 in W. R. Burch, Jr., et al. (eds.) Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment. New York: Harper & Row.
32.
NIE, N. H. , et al. (1975) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
PARKIN, F. (1971) Class Inequality and Political Order. New York: Praeger.
34.
ROSENBAUM, W. A. (1973) The Politics of Environmental Concern. New York: Praeger.
35.
SCHNAIBERG, A. (1975) "Social syntheses of the societal-environmental dialectic: the role of distributional impacts."Social Sci. Q.56 (June): 5-20.
36.
SCHNAIBERG, A. (1973) "Politics, participation, and pollution: the `environmental movement'," pp. 605-627 in J. Walton and D. E. Carns (eds.) Cities in Change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
SEXTON, P. and B. SEXTON (1971) Blue Collars and Hard Hats. New York: Random House.
38.
SMITH, J. N. (1974) Environmental Quality and Social Justice in Urban America. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
39.
TOGNACCI, L. N. , R. H. WEIGEL, M. F. WIDEEN, and D.T.A. VERNON (1972) "Environmental quality: how universal is public concern?"Environment and Behavior4 (March): 73-86.
40.
WEBER, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization [ed. and trans. T. Parsons] New York: Free Press.
41.
WRIGHT, S. (1975) "Explaining environmental commitment: the role of social class variables." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Sociological Society, Chicago, April.
42.
ZWERDLING, D. (1973) "Poverty and pollution."Progressive37 (January): 25-29.
