Green spaces have the potential to foster social capital, yet we do not fully understand what motivates people to use these spaces and how green space use leads to social benefits. Recent studies suggest that perceptions of green space are more important than just physical attributes in encouraging usage and fostering social connections. Perceptions can determine green space usage, but we do not yet know exactly how perceptions of green space relate to social capital. We conducted a series of perception studies among residents of eight public housing estates in Singapore, to demonstrate that affordances serve as a bridge between the physical characteristics of a place and the ways people perceive and use it. These affordances – reflected in experiences of vitality, enjoyment, and comfort – shape motivations for use, such as exercising, socializing, and relaxing, which in turn foster stronger social capital.
ArmstrongS.WongC. A.PerrinE.PageS.SibleyL.SkinnerA. (2018). Association of physical activity with income, race/ethnicity, and sex among adolescents and young adults in the United States findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2007-2016. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(8), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1273
3.
BarsingerhornA. D.ZaalF. T. J. M.SmithJ.PeppingG. J. (2012). On possibilities for action: The past, present and future of affordance research. Avant, 3(2), 54–69. http://www.rug.nl/research/portal
4.
BaurJ. W. R.GómezE.TynonJ. F. (2013). Urban Nature Parks and Neighborhood Social Health in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 31(4), 23–44.
5.
BertramC.MeyerhoffJ.RehdanzK.WüstemannH. (2017). Differences in the recreational value of urban parks between weekdays and weekends: A discrete choice analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.006
6.
BianY.HuangX. (2015). Beyond the strength of social ties: Job search networks and entry-level wage in Urban China. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(8), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215580608
7.
BloklandT.NastJ. (2014). From public familiarity to comfort zone: The relevance of absent ties for belonging in Berlin’s mixed neighbourhoods. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1142–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12126
8.
BroylesS. T.MowenA. J.TheallK. P.GustatJ.RungA. L. (2011). Integrating social capital into a park-use and active-living framework. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(5), 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.028
9.
BuchelS.FrantzeskakiN. (2015). Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, 12, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.014
10.
CabreraJ. F.NajarianJ. C. (2013). How the built environment shapes spatial bridging ties and social capital. Environment and Behavior, 47(3), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513500275
11.
CardinaliM.BeenackersM. A.Fleury-BahiG.BodénanP.PetrovaM. T.van TimmerenA.PottgiesserU. (2024). Examining green space characteristics for social cohesion and mental health outcomes: A sensitivity analysis in four European cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 93, Article 128230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128230
12.
CarmonaM. (2015). Re-theorising contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism, 8(4), 373–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.909518
ChuaV. (2015). How do Singaporeans connect? Ties among Chinese, Malays, and Indians. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(9), 1115–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215580617
15.
ChungS.ChoiH.LeeS. S. yoon. (2014). Measuring social capital in the republic of Korea with mixed methods: Application of factor analysis and fuzzy-set ideal type approach. Social Indicators Research, 117(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0341-8
16.
ClarkC.UzzellD. L. (2006). The socio-environmental affordances of adolescents’ environments. In SpencerC.BladesM. (Eds.), Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces (pp. 176–196). Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521232.012
17.
ColeyR. L.SullivanW. C.KuoF. E. (1997). Where Does Community Grow?: The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 468–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659702900402
DadvandP.BartollX.BasagañaX.Dalmau-BuenoA.MartinezD.AmbrosA.CirachM.Triguero-MasM.GasconM.BorrellC.NieuwenhuijsenM. J. (2016). Green spaces and general health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment International, 91, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029
20.
de VriesS.van DillenS. M. E.GroenewegenP. P.SpreeuwenbergP. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science and Medicine, 94, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030
21.
DinnieE.BrownK. M.MorrisS. (2013). Reprint of ‘Community, cooperation and conflict: Negotiating the social well-being benefits of urban greenspace experiences’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.011
22.
EicherC.KawachiI. (2011). Social capital and community design. In DannenberA. L.FrumkinH.JacksonR. J. (Eds.), Making healthy places: Designing and building for health, well-being, and sustainability (pp. 117–128). Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-036-1
23.
EngT. S. (1996). Character and identity in Singapore New Towns : National University of Singapore. Habitat International, 20(2), 279–294.
24.
FanY.DasK. V.ChenQ. (2011). Neighborhood green, social support, physical activity, and stress: Assessing the cumulative impact. Health and Place, 17(6), 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.008
GehlJ. (2010). Toolbox. In Cities for people (pp. 231–246). Island Press.
27.
GehlJ. (2011). Life between buildings (6th ed.). Island Press.
28.
Gibson. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
29.
GobsterP. H.NassauerJ. I.DanielT. C.FryG. (2007). The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?Landscape Ecology, 22(7), 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
30.
GloverT. D.ParryD. C.ShinewK. J. (2005). Building relationships, accessing resources: Mobilizing social capital in community garden contexts. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(4), 450–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950062
31.
GrootaertC.NarayanD.JonesV. N.WoolcockM. (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire (Working Paper No. 18). World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/15033
32.
HadaviS.KaplanR. (2016). Neighborhood satisfaction and use patterns in urban public outdoor spaces: Multidimensionality and two-way relationships. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 19, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.05.012
33.
HadaviS.KaplanR.HunterM. R. (2017). How does perception of nearby nature affect multiple aspects of neighbourhood satisfaction and use patterns?Landscape Research, 6397(May), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1314453
34.
HawkinsR. L.MaurerK. (2010). Bonding, bridging and linking: How social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. British Journal of Social Work, 40(6), 1777–1793. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp087
35.
HelliwellJ. F.PutnamR. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
36.
HengS. L.ChowW. T. L. (2019). How ‘hot’ is too hot? Evaluating acceptable outdoor thermal comfort ranges in an equatorial urban park. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63(6), 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01694-1
37.
HoltanM. T.DieterlenS. L.SullivanW. C. (2015). Social life under cover: Tree canopy and social capital in Baltimore, Maryland. Environment and Behavior, 47(5), 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513518064
38.
HongA.SallisJ. F.KingA. C.ConwayT. L.SaelensB.CainK. L.FoxE. H.FrankL. D. (2018). Linking green space to neighborhood social capital in older adults: The role of perceived safety. Social Science and Medicine, 207(April), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.051
IljaA. (2012). Does public space create social capital?International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 4(2), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJSA11.084
KempermanA.TimmermansH. (2014). Green spaces in the direct living environment and social contacts of the aging population. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.003
KimG.MillerP. A. (2019). The impact of green infrastructure on human health and well-being: The example of the Huckleberry Trail and the Heritage Community Park and Natural Area in Blacksburg, Virginia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, Article 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101562
47.
KingsleyJ.‘Yotti’TownsendM. (2006). ‘Dig in’ to social capital: Community gardens as mechanisms for growing urban social connectedness. Urban Policy and Research, 24(4), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140601035200
48.
KuoF. E.SullivanW. C.ColeyR. L.BrunsonL. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 823–851. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022294028903
49.
KweonB.-S.SullivanW. C.WileyA. R. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 832–858.
50.
LaurenceJ. (2011). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multi-level analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp057
51.
MazumdarS.LearnihanV.CochraneT.DaveyR. (2017). The built environment and social capital: A systematic review. Environment and Behavior, 50(2), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516687343
52.
MazumdarS.LearnihanV.CochraneT.DaveyR. (2018). The built environment and social capital: A systematic review. Environment and Behavior, 50(2), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516687343
53.
MepparambathR. M.LeD. T. T.OonJ.SongJ.HuynhH. N. (2024). Influence of the built environment on social capital and physical activity in Singapore: A structural equation modelling analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society, 103, Article 105259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105259
54.
Morales-FloresP.Marmolejo-DuarteC. (2025). Understanding the relationship between public space social capital expressions and pedestrian-oriented design. A case study within the superblock action plan in Barcelona. Cities, 162, Article 105968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.105968
55.
MuB.LiuC.MuT.XuX.TianG.ZhangY.KimG. (2021). Spatiotemporal fluctuations in urban park spatial vitality determined by on-site observation and behavior mapping: A case study of three parks in Zhengzhou City, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 64(January), Article 127246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127246
56.
OhR. R. Y.ZhangY.NghiemL. T. P.ChangC.chen, TanC. L. Y.QuaziS. A.ShanahanD. F.LinB. B.GastonK. J.FullerR. A.CarrascoR. L. (2022). Connection to nature and time spent in gardens predicts social cohesion. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 74(June), Article 127655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127655
57.
OrbanE.SutcliffeR.DraganoN.JöckelK. H.MoebusS. (2017). Residential surrounding greenness, self-rated health and interrelations with aspects of neighborhood environment and social relations. Journal of Urban Health, 94(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0112-3
58.
PeschardtK. K.SchipperijnJ.StigsdotterU. K. (2012). Use of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002
59.
PeschardtK. K.StigsdotterU. K. (2013). Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013
60.
PeschardtK. K.StigsdotterU. K.SchipperrijnJ. (2016). Identifying features of pocket parks that may be related to health promoting use. Landscape Research, 41(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2014.894006
61.
PetersK.ElandsB.BuijsA. (2010). Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion?Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 9(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
62.
PetersK.StodolskaM.HoroletsA. (2016). The role of natural environments in developing a sense of belonging: A comparative study of immigrants in the U.S., Poland, the Netherlands and Germany. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 17, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.001
63.
PoortingaW. (2012). Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health and Place, 18(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.017
64.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
65.
RefshaugeA. D.StigsdotterU. K.CoscoN. G. (2012). Adults’ motivation for bringing their children to park playgrounds. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(4), 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.002
66.
SamsudinR.TanP. Y.ChuaV. (2022). Social capital formation in high density urban environments : Perceived attributes of neighborhood green space shape social capital more directly than physical ones. Landscape and Urban Planning, 227, Article 104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104527
67.
SchetkeS.QureshiS.LautenbachS.KabischN. (2016). What determines the use of urban green spaces in highly urbanized areas? - Examples from two fast growing Asian cities. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 16, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.009
68.
SeelandK.DübendorferS.HansmannR. (2009). Making friends in Zurich’s urban forests and parks: The role of public green space for social inclusion of youths from different cultures. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.005
69.
ShaS.ChengQ. (2024). Built or Social environment? Effects of perceptions of neighborhood green spaces on resilience of residents to heat waves. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 94, Article 128267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128267
70.
SiaA.TanP. Y.KimY. J.ErK. B. H. (2023). Use and non-use of parks are dictated by nature orientation, perceived accessibility and social norm which manifest in a continuum. Landscape and Urban Planning, 235, Article 104758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104758
71.
StoltzJ.GrahnP. (2021). Perceived sensory dimensions: An evidence-based approach to greenspace aesthetics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 59(January), Article 126989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126989
72.
SuY.ZhangX.XuanY. (2024). Linking neighborhood green spaces to loneliness among elderly residents—A path analysis of social capital. Cities, 149, Article 104952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104952
73.
SullivanW. C.KuoF. E.DePooterS. F. (2004). The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior, 36(5), 678–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04264945
74.
SvendsenG. L. H. (2010). Socio-spatial planning in the creation of bridging social capital: The importance of multifunctional centers for intergroup networks and integration. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 3(2), 45–73.
75.
TanP. Yok.LiaoK.-H.HwangY. H.ChuaV. (2018). Nature, place & people: Forging connections through neighbourhood landscape design. World Scientific.
WhyteW. H. (2001). The social life of small urban spaces (8th ed.). Project for Public Spaces.
78.
WuJ. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 999–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
79.
YooC.LeeS. (2016). Neighborhood built environments affecting social capital and social sustainability in Seoul, Korea. Sustainability, 8(12), Article 1346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121346
ZhangL.YokP.RongD.GanY.SamsudinR. (2022). Assessment of mediators in the associations between urban green spaces and self-reported health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 226(October 2021), Article 104503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104503
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
