Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-4
Impact of Urban Influence and Population Pressure on Cooperative Pasture Management: Insights from a Public Goods Game Approach with Mongolian Pastoralists
Communal grassland ecology in pastoral regions in Mongolia has traditionally been sustained through voluntary cooperation, without the need for penalties or incentives. However, socio-economic shifts may impact this cooperation, complicating ecological conservation. This study investigates how urban proximity and rising population pressure influence voluntary cooperation. We conducted public goods game experiments with 150 groups comprising 600 pastoralists across five regions. Econometric analysis revealed that proximity to urban areas had a negative effect, while population density positively influenced cooperation. Additionally, high contributions were maintained through simple instructions, without penalties or incentives. These findings suggest that engaging local communities fosters voluntary contributions to public goods, although these contributions may decline as traditional norms weaken under urban influence. This study highlights the importance of tailoring communal resource management policies to local socio-economic conditions.
AddisonJ.DaviesJ.FriedelM.BrownC. (2013). Do pasture user groups lead to improved rangeland condition in the Mongolian Gobi Desert?Journal of Arid Environments, 94, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.02.009
2.
AllingtonG. R. H.LiW.BrownD. G. (2017). Urbanization and environmental policy effects on the future availability of grazing resources on the Mongolian Plateau: Modeling socio-environmental system dynamics. Environmental Science & Policy, 68, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.005
3.
AlventosaA.AntonioniA.HernandezP. (2021). Pool punishment in public goods games: How do sanctioners’ incentives affect us?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 185, 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.03.004
4.
AndreoniJ. (1988). Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public-goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6
5.
AxelrodS.ApscheJ. (1983). The effects of punishment on human behavior. Academic Press.
6.
BasuJ. P. (2021). Forest participation of local communities: a study of a tribal dominated region in India. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 23(1), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-020-00142-w
7.
BowlesS. (2016). The moral economy: Why good incentives are no substitute for good citizens. Yale University Press.
8.
BrandtsJ.RottC.SolaC. (2016). Not just like starting over—Leadership and revivification of cooperation in groups. Experimental Economics, 19(4), 792–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-015-9468-6
9.
CardenasJ. C. (2004). Norms from outside and from inside: An experimental analysis on the governance of local ecosystems. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(3–4), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.006
10.
CardenasJ. C.StranlundJ.WillisC. (2000). Local environmental control and institutional crowding-out. World Development, 28(10), 1719–1733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750x(00)00055-3
11.
ConteT. J. (2022). Steppe Generosity: Kinship, social reputations, and perceived need drive generous giving in a non-anonymous allocation game among Mongolian pastoral nomads. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43(3), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.01.001
EmberC. R.SkoggardI.RingenE. J.FarrerM. (2018). Our better nature: Does resource stress predict beyond-household sharing?Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.001
14.
EnsmingerJ. (2004). Market integration and fairness: Evidence from ultimatum, dictator, and public goods experiments in East Africa. In HenrichJ.BoydR.BowlesS.CamererC. F.FehrE.GintisH. (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies (pp. 356–381). Oxford University Press.
15.
Fernández-GiménezM. E. (2002). Spatial and social boundaries and the paradox of pastoral land tenure: A case study from postsocialist Mongolia. Human Ecology, 30(1), 49–78.
16.
Gil-WhiteF. J. (2004). Ultimatum game with an ethnicity manipulation: Results from Khovdiin Bulgan sum, Mongolia. In HenrichJ.BoydR.BowlesS.CamererC.FehrE.GintisH. (Eds.), Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199262055.003.0012
17.
HenrichJ.BoydR.BowlesS.CamererC.FehrE.GintisH.McElreathR.AlvardM.BarrA.EnsmingerJ.HenrichN. S. (2005). "Economic man" in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525x05000142
18.
KakinumaK.YanagawaA.SasakiT.RaoM. P.KanaeS. (2019). Socio-ecological interactions in a changing climate: A review of the Mongolian pastoral system. Sustainability, 11(21), 5883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215883
19.
LiY.MifuneN. (2023). Punishment in the public goods game is evaluated negatively irrespective of noncooperators' motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1198797. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1198797
20.
LiaoQ.DongW.ZhaoB. (2023). A new strategy to solve “the Tragedy of the Commons” in sustainable grassland ecological compensation: Experience from inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability, 15(12), 9222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129222
21.
MillietE.PlancherelC.RoulinA.ButeraF. (2024). The effect of collaboration on farmers’ pro-environmental behaviors – A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102223
22.
NieZ.YangX.TuQ. (2020). Resource scarcity and cooperation: Evidence from a gravity irrigation system in China. World Development, 135, 105035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105035
23.
OnikiS.DagysK.SakamotoG. (2025). Communal resource management, morality, and economic development: a case of pastureland management in Mongolia. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.gor/10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3
24.
OnikiS.DagysK.YetyekbaiM. (2024). Market economy and norms of grassland utilization in Mongolia. Society & Natural Resources, 37(6), 940–956. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2024.2312929
25.
OnikiS.EtsayH.BerheM.NegashT. (2020). Improving cooperation among farmers for communal land conservation in Ethiopia: A public goods experiment. Sustainability, 12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219290
26.
PlatteauJ.-P. (2000). Institutions, social norms, and economic development. Routledge.
27.
PlatteauJ.-P. (2006). Solidarity norms and institutions in village societies: Static and dynamic considerations. In KolmS.-C.YthierJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol. 1, pp. 819–886). Elsevier.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
30.
RazaA.AliQ.HussainT. (2021). Role of knowledge, behavior, norms, and e-guidelines in controlling the spread of COVID-19: evidence from Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(30), 40329–40345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10931-9
31.
RojasC.CinnerJ. (2020). Do market and trust contexts spillover into public goods contributions? Evidence from experimental games in Papua New Guinea. Ecological Economics, 174, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106661
32.
ShenJ. Y.QinX. D. (2014). Cooperation, trust and economic development: An experimental study in China. Pacific Economic Review, 19(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12073
33.
SpadaroG.GrafC.JinS. X.AraiS.InoueY.LiebermanE.RinderuM. I.YuanM.van LissaC. J.BallietD. (2022). Cross-cultural variation in cooperation: A meta-analysis cross-cultural variation in cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(5), 1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000389
34.
SunX. P.LiM. Y.KangH. W.ShenY.ChenQ. Y. (2023). Combined effect of pure punishment and reward in the public goods game. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2023.127853
35.
UlambayarT.Fernández-GiménezM. E. (2019). How community-based rangeland management achieves positive social outcomes in Mongolia: A moderated mediation analysis. Land Use Policy, 82, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.008
36.
UlambayarT.Fernández-GiménezM. E.BaivalB.BatjavB. (2017). Social outcomes of community-based rangeland management in Mongolian steppe ecosystems. Conservation Letters, 10(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12267
37.
UndargaaS.McCarthyJ. F. (2016). Beyond property: Co-management and pastoral resource access in Mongolia. World Development, 77, 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.012
38.
UptonC. (2012). Managing Mongolia's commons: Land reforms, social contexts, and institutional change. Society & Natural Resources, 25(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2011.597494
39.
UptonC. (2009). “Custom” and contestation: Land reform in post-socialist Mongolia. World Development, 37(8), 1400–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.014
40.
VyrastekovaJ.FunakiY.TakeuchiA. (2011). Sanctioning as a social norm: Expectations of non-strategic sanctioning in a public goods game experiment. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(6), 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.08.020
ZhangB. Y.AnX. M.DongY. L. (2021). Conditional cooperator enhances institutional punishment in public goods game. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125600
