Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by incorporating actual climate change knowledge and demographics as moderating factors, this study explores the determinants of Iranian citizens’ support for a hypothetical carbon tax of US$9. Data from an online questionnaire survey was analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling in R. The results revealed that attitudes and perceived behavioral control are significant predictors of support. Moreover, the effect of climate change knowledge and moderating factors were generally insignificant. Notably, respondents preferred carbon tax revenues to be used for environmental initiatives and showed disagreement with the proposed progressive revenue scheme, alongside signs of low trust in the government for transparent implementation. The findings offer significant implications for policymakers aiming to foster public support for carbon taxation in Iran and other developing countries.
Aguilar-LuzónM. D. C.García-MartínezJ. M. Á.Calvo-SalgueroA.SalinasJ. M. (2012). Comparative study between the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm model regarding the environment, on Spanish housewives’ recycling behavior: Recycling behavior of Spanish housewives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2797–2833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00962.x
2.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 39–1l). Springer.
3.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentiss-Hall.
6.
AjzenI.JoyceN.SheikhS.CoteN. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.568834
7.
AbdelNaeem MahmoudR. (2018). State capacity and the social impact of energy subsidies reforms in Jordan and Iran. In LynchM.CammettM.FabbeK. (Eds.), Social policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 34–40). Project On Middle East Political Science (POMEPS).
8.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. The British journal of social psychology, 40(Pt 4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
11.
AsifM. H.ZhongfuT.IrfanM.IşıkC. (2023). Do environmental knowledge and green trust matter for purchase intention of eco-friendly home appliances? An application of extended theory of planned behavior. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 37762–37774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24899-1
12.
BachusK.Van OotegemL.VerhofstadtE. (2019). ‘No taxation without hypothecation’: Towards an improved understanding of the acceptability of an environmental tax reform. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1623654
13.
BaranziniA.CarattiniS. (2017). Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: Testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 19(1), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0144-7
14.
BicketM.VannerR. (2016). Designing policy mixes for resource efficiency: The role of public acceptability. Sustainability, 8(4), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040366
15.
BotetzagiasI.DimaA.-F.MalesiosC. (2015). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004
16.
BradleyJ. C.WaliczekT. M.ZajicekJ. M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601873
BristowA. L.WardmanM.ZanniA. M.ChintakayalaP. K. (2010). Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1824–1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021
19.
CarattiniS.CarvalhoM.FankhauserS. (2018). Overcoming public resistance to carbon taxes. WIREs Climate Change, 9(5), e531. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.531
ChenS.-C.HungC.-W. (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.022
23.
CheungS. F.ChanD. K.-S.WongZ. S.-Y. (1999). Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding wastepaper recycling. Environment and Behavior, 31(5), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972254
24.
CrippaM.GuizzardiD.PaganiF.BanjaM.MunteanM.SchaafE.BeckerW.Monforti-FerrarioF.QuadrelliR.Risquez MartinA.Taghavi-MoharamliP.KöykkäJ.GrassiG.RossiS.BrandaoDeMeloJ.OomD.BrancoA.San-MiguelJ.VignatiE. (2023). GHG emissions of all world countries. Publications Office of the European Union. JRC134504.
25.
DangH. P.Nguyen VietB. (2021). Inside the intention to join extracurricular activities: Integrating the theory of planned behavior and signaling theory. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1888672. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.1888672
Debora IndrianiI. A.RahayuM.HadiwidjojoD. (2019). The Influence of environmental knowledge on green purchase intention the role of attitude as mediating variable. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(2), 627. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.706
28.
De GrootJ.StegL. (2007). General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: The role of environmental concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1817–1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00239.x
29.
de LeeuwA.ValoisP.AjzenI.SchmidtP. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
30.
DietzT.DanA.ShwomR. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781170026
31.
DijkstraE. M.GoedhartM. J. (2012). Development and validation of the ACSI: Measuring students’ science attitudes, pro-environmental behaviour, climate change attitudes and knowledge. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.662213
32.
DonaldI. J.CooperS. R.ConchieS. M. (2014). An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters’ transport mode use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.003
33.
DouenneT.FabreA. (2020). French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecological Economics, 169, 106496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106496
34.
DreyerS. J.WalkerI. (2013). Acceptance and support of the Australian carbon policy. Social Justice Research, 26(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0191-1
35.
EcoIran. (2024). Which social media platforms do Iranians like the most. http://bit.ly/41lizDE
36.
EnglerD.GrohE. D.GutscheG.ZieglerA. (2021). Acceptance of climate-oriented policy measures under the COVID-19 crisis: An empirical analysis for Germany. Climate Policy, 21, 1281–1297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1864269
37.
EwaldJ.SternerT.SternerE. (2022). Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters. Resource and Energy Economics, 70, 101331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331
38.
FinchW. H.FrenchB. F. (2015). Latent variable modeling with R. Routledge.
39.
Five-Year National Development Plans. (2011). The Fifth Law of Five-Year National Development Plans, arts 133, 139, 192 (in Farsi).
40.
Five-Year National Development Plans. (2017). The Sixth Law of Five-Year National Development Plans, arts 38, 39 (in Farsi).
41.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
42.
FrickJ.KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(8), 1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
43.
GanaK.BrocG. (2019). Structural equation modeling with lavaan. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
44.
GeigerS. M.GeigerM.WilhelmO. (2019). Environment-specific vs. general knowledge and their role in pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00718
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
47.
GrilliG.NotaroS. (2019). Exploring the influence of an extended theory of planned behaviour on preferences and willingness to pay for participatory natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.103
48.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. (2005). First- and higher-order models of attitudes, normative influence, and perceived behavioural control in the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(Pt 4), 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X16219
49.
HammarH.JagersS. C. (2006). Can trust in politicians explain individuals’ support for climate policy? The case of CO2tax. Climate Policy, 5(6), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582
50.
HammarH.JagersS. C. (2007). What is a fair CO2 tax increase? On fair emission reductions in the transport sector. Ecological Economics, 61(2-3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.004
HanT.-I.StoelL. (2016). Explaining socially responsible consumer behavior: A meta-analytic review of theory of planned behavior. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870
53.
HarringN.JagersS. (2013). Should we trust in values? Explaining public support for pro-environmental taxes. Sustainability, 5(1), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5010210
54.
HoS. S.LiaoY.RosenthalS. (2015). Applying the theory of planned behavior and media dependency theory: Predictors of public pro-environmental behavioral intentions in Singapore. Environmental Communication, 9(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.932819
55.
HsuS.-L.WaltersJ.PurgasA. (2008). Pollution tax heuristics: An empirical study of willingness to pay higher gasoline taxes. Energy Policy, 36(9), 3612–3619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.010
56.
Iran's Department of Environment. (2015). Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC). National Climate Change Committee.
57.
Iran’s Statistics Center. (2023). The yearbook of 2016. Office of the President, Public Relations and International Cooperation (in Farsi).
58.
JaccardJ.WanC. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage Publications, Inc.
59.
JagersS. C.MartinssonJ.MattiS. (2019). The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: An experimental study in Sweden. Climate Policy, 19(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1470963
60.
JavidanM.DastmalchianA. (2003). Culture and leadership in Iran: The land of individual achievers, strong family ties, and powerful elite. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(4), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.11851896
61.
JonesL. W.CourneyaK. S.VallanceJ. K.LadhaA. B.MantM. J.BelchA. R.ReimanT. (2006). Understanding the determinants of exercise intentions in multiple myeloma cancer survivors: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Cancer Nursing, 29(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200605000-00001
62.
JorgensenT. D.PornprasertmanitS.SchoemannA. M.RosseelY. (2022). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
63.
KaiserF. G.FuhrerU. (2003). Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology, 52(4), 598–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00153
64.
KaiserF. G.HubnerG.BognerF. X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), 2150–2170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02213.x
65.
KallbekkenS.SælenH. (2011). Public acceptance for environmental taxes: Self-interest, environmental and distributional concerns. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2966–2973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.006
66.
KlenertD.MattauchL.CombetE.EdenhoferO.HepburnC.RafatyR.SternN. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2
67.
Leclercq-MachadoL.Alvarez-RiscoA.Gómez-PradoR.Cuya-VelásquezB. B.Esquerre-BottonS.Morales-RíosF.Almanza-CruzC.Castillo-BenancioS.Anderson-SeminarioM. D. L. M.Del-Aguila-ArcentalesS.YáñezJ. A. (2022). Sustainable fashion and consumption patterns in Peru: An environmental-attitude-intention-behavior analysis. Sustainability, 14(16), 9965. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169965
68.
LevineD. S.StrubeM. J. (2012). Environmental Attitudes, knowledge, intentions and behaviors among college students. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.604363
69.
LiuP.TengM.HanC. (2020). How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors? The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126
70.
López-MosqueraN. (2016). Gender differences, theory of planned behavior and willingness to pay. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.006
71.
López-MosqueraN.SánchezM. (2012). Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.029
72.
MacKinnonD. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacoveiO. I. (2015). Applying the theory of planned behavior in predicting pro- environmental behavior: The case of energy conservation. AUDŒ, 11(4), 15–32.
75.
Maestre-AndrésS.DrewsS.van Den BerghJ. (2019). Perceived Fairness and public acceptability of carbon Pricing: A review of the literature. Climate Policy, 19(9), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1639490
76.
ManchaR. M.YoderC. Y. (2015). Cultural antecedents of green behavioral intent: An environmental theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.005
77.
McCrightA. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32(1), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
78.
MorrenM.GrinsteinA. (2016). Explaining environmental behavior across borders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.003
79.
MorrisM. G.VenkateshV.AckermanP. L. (2005). Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2004.839967
NaseriM.AhadiM. S.Massah BavaniA.EshraghiH.EbrahimiM.Sadeghi HaririM.MaghsoudiM.BabayiN.DaneshA. (2017). National strategic plan on climate change. Hak Publishing (in Farsi).
82.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Effective Carbon Rates 2021: Pricing Carbon Emissions through Taxes and Emissions Trading. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0e8e24f5-en.
83.
PaçoA.LavradorT. (2017). Environmental Knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.100
84.
PanJ.CrossJ. L.ZouX.ZhangB. (2024). To tax or to trade? A global review of carbon emissions reduction strategies. Energy Strategy Reviews, 55, 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101508
PaulJ.ModiA.PatelJ. (2016). Predicting Green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134.
87.
PetersG. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. The European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h47fv
88.
PolonskyM. J.VocinoA.GrauS. L.GarmaR.FerdousA. S. (2012). The impact of general and carbon-related environmental knowledge on attitudes and behaviour of US consumers. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 238–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.659279
89.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/.
90.
QuoquabF.MohammadJ.ShahrinR. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior in nutricosmetics product purchase context: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 14(2), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-04-2019-0033
91.
RexJ.LoboA.LeckieC. (2015). Evaluating the drivers of sustainable behavioral intentions: An application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(3), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2015.1053342
92.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. É.SavaleiV. (2012). When can categorical variables Be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
93.
RhodesR. E.BeauchampM. R.ConnerM.de BruijnG.-J.KaushalN.Latimer-CheungA. (2015). Prediction of depot-based specialty recycling behavior using an extended theory of planned behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47(9), 1001–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514534066
94.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
95.
RotarisL.DanielisR. (2019). The willingness to pay for a carbon tax in Italy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.001
96.
RoutheA. S.JonesR. E.FeldmanD. L. (2005). Using theory to understand public support for collective actions that impact the environment: Alleviating water supply problems in a nonarid biome. Social Science Quarterly, 86(4), 874–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00361.x
SánchezM.López-MosqueraN.Lera-LópezF.FaulinJ. (2018). An extended planned behavior model to explain the willingness to pay to reduce noise pollution in road transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.210
99.
SavinI.DrewsS.Maestre-AndrésS.van Den BerghJ. (2020). Public views on carbon taxation and its fairness: A computational-linguistics analysis. Climatic Change, 162(4), 2107–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02842-y
100.
SchadeJ.SchlagB. (2003). Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8478(02)00046-3
101.
SchoemannA. M.JorgensenT. D. (2021). Testing and interpreting latent variable interactions using the semTools package. Psyche, 3(3), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030024
102.
SchuitemaG.StegL.ForwardS. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 44(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.005
103.
ShinY. H.JungS. E.ImJ.SevertK. (2020). Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to examine state-branded food product purchase behavior: The moderating effect of gender. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 23(4), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2020.1770043
104.
SiH.ShiJ. G.TangD.WenS.MiaoW.DuanK. (2019). Application of the theory of planned behavior in environmental science: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152788
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
107.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.
ThormannT. F.WickerP. (2021). Determinants of pro-environmental behavior among voluntary sport club members. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 51(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-020-00700-8
UmitR.SchafferL. M. (2020). Attitudes towards carbon taxes across Europe: The role of perceived uncertainty and self-interest. Energy Policy, 140, 111385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111385
114.
United Nations. (2021). Handbook on carbon taxation in developing countries. United Nations.
115.
YadavR.PathakG. S. (2017). Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019
116.
ZahediS.Batista-FoguetJ. M.van WunnikL. (2019). Exploring the public’s willingness to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from private road transport in Catalonia. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.361
117.
ZhangL.Ruiz-MenjivarJ.LuoB.LiangZ.SwisherM. E. (2020). Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408
118.
ZimmtR. (2017). Iran’s middle class: An agent of political change?Strategic Assessment, 20(3), 59–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
