This study examines the role of perceived marketplace influence (PMI) in adopting electric vehicles (EVs) and the underlying mechanisms that drive consumer behavior. Using an online survey, data from 382 individuals were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The study tested a behavioral model comprising green knowledge, environmental concern (EC), and green trust, exploring the moderating effects of experience and gender. Findings revealed that green knowledge positively affected green trust, subsequently influencing ECs. PMI consumers and PMI organizations mediated the association between ECs and the intention to purchase an EV, with PMI organizations having a more substantial impact. The intent to buy an EV was positively associated with green customer engagement. Experience and gender moderate many of the hypotheses proposed. The study provides valuable insights into the drivers of EV adoption and suggests that understanding PMI’s effect on consumer behavior can help promote the transition to sustainable transportation.
Adu-GyamfiG.SongH.NketiahE.ObuobiB.AdjeiM.CudjoeD. (2022). Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles. Energy, 251, 123862.
2.
AhmadF. S.RosliN. T.QuoquabF. (2021). Environmental quality awareness, green trust, green self-efficacy and environmental attitude in influencing green purchase behaviour. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(1), 68–90.
3.
AmoakoG. K.DzogbenukuR. K.AbubakariA. (2020). Do green knowledge and attitude influence the youth’s green purchasing? Theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(8), 1609–1626.
4.
BagaskoroG. Y.QastharinA. R. (2021). Determining factors that influence indonesian consumers’ sustainable purchase behavior. Journal of International Conference Proceedings (JICP), 4(2), 275–291.
BrucksM. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1–16.
7.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456.
8.
ChakrabortyD.SiddiquiA.SiddiquiM.AlatawiF. M. H. (2022). Exploring consumer purchase intentions and behavior of buying ayurveda products using SOBC framework. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102889.
9.
CheahJ. H.ThurasamyR.MemonM. A.ChuahF.TingH. (2020). Multigroup analysis using SmartPLS: Step-by-step guidelines for business research. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(3), I–XIX.
10.
ChenY. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319.
11.
ChuahS. H. W.El-ManstrlyD.TsengM. L.RamayahT. (2020). Sustaining customer engagement behavior through corporate social responsibility: The roles of environmental concern and green trust. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121348.
12.
ChyhrynO. Y.PimonenkoT. V.BilanY. V.StarchenkoL. V. (2019). Digital marketing for green goods promotion: Modern trends in entrepreneurship [Conference session]. Conference Proceedings: The Impact of Industry 4.0 on Job Creation, Teplice, Slovakia, 21 November 2019 (pp. 160–166.). Alexander Dubček University.
13.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
14.
CruzS. M.ManataB. (2020). Measurement of environmental concern: A review and analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 363.
15.
DavisT. R.LuthansF. (1980). A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 281–290.
16.
de Oliveira SantiniF.LadeiraW. J.PintoD. C.HerterM. M.SampaioC. H.BabinB. J. (2020). Customer engagement in social media: A framework and meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(6), 1211–1228.
17.
DhirA.SadiqM.TalwarS.SakashitaM.KaurP. (2021). Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102398.
18.
DhirA.TalwarS.SadiqM.SakashitaM.KaurP. (2021). Green apparel buying behaviour: A Stimulus–Organism–Behaviour–Consequence (SOBC) perspective on sustainability-oriented consumption in Japan. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3589–3605.
19.
DoeJ. K.Van de WeteringR.HonyenugaB.VersendaalJ. (2022). Extended contextual validation of stakeholder approach to firm technology adoption: Moderating and mediating relationships in an innovation eco-system. Society and Business Review, 17(4), 506–540.
20.
EaglyA. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press.
21.
FarahM. F.NewmanA. J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott intelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347–355.
22.
FarmerD.KimH.LeeJ. B. (2022). The relationship between exposure to and trust in automated transport technologies and intention to use a shared autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(19), 5897–5909.
23.
FarookF. S.AbeysekaraN. (2016). Influence of social media marketing on customer engagement. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(12), 115–125.
24.
FassottG.HenselerJ.CoelhoP. S. (2016). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models with composite variables. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1887–1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-06-2016-0248
25.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
26.
FlynnL. R.GoldsmithR. E. (1999). A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 57–66.
27.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
28.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1992). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness of fit indices for structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 132–160.
29.
GichaB. B.TufaL. T.LeeJ. (2024). The electric vehicle revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Energy Strategy Reviews, 53, 101384.
30.
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157.
31.
Glavee-GeoR.ShaikhA. A.KarjaluotoH. (2017). Mobile banking services adoption in Pakistan: Are there gender differences?International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(7), 1090–1114.
32.
GoldA. H.MalhotraA.SegarsA. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.
33.
Grau-BerlangaL.Higueras-CastilloE.ShaikhA. A.Liébana-CabanillasF. (2023). Drivers of sustainable consumption: Gender moderating effect. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 385–409.
34.
HairJ. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. In LovricM. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 904–907). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_395
35.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
36.
HairJ. F.HollingsworthC. L.RandolphA. B.ChongA. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458.
37.
HairJ. F.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM.ThieleK. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616–632.
38.
HairJ. F.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.MenaJ. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.
39.
HameedI.WarisI. (2018). Eco labels and eco conscious consumer behavior: The mediating effect of green trust and environmental concern. Journal of Management Sciences, 5(2), 86–105.
40.
HamzahM. I. (2023). Fear of COVID-19 disease and QR-based mobile payment adoption: A protection motivation perspective. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 29(3), 946–963.
41.
HamzahM. I.TanwirN. S. (2021). Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123643.
42.
HarmelingC. M.MoffettJ. W.ArnoldM. J.CarlsonB. D. (2017). Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 312–335.
43.
HenselerJ.DijkstraT. K.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.DiamantopoulosA.StraubD. W.KetchenJrD. J., HairJ. F.HultG. T. M.CalantoneR. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
44.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2015). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-09-2014-0304
45.
HerzallahD.Muñoz-LeivaF.Liebana-CabanillasF. (2022). Drivers of purchase intention in Instagram commerce. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 26(2), 168–188.
46.
Higueras-CastilloE.García-MarotoI.Muñoz-LeivaF.Liébana-CabanillasF. (2022). Modelling sustainable mobility adoption from the urban population view (SMAUP model): The moderating effect of household size. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100878.
47.
Higueras-CastilloE.KalinicZ.MarinkovicV.Liébana-CabanillasF. J. (2020). A mixed analysis of perceptions of electric and hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy, 136, 111076.
48.
Higueras-CastilloE.Liébana-CabanillasF. J.Muñoz-LeivaF.García-MarotoI. (2019). Evaluating consumer attitudes toward electromobility and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 387–398.
49.
Higueras-CastilloE.Liébana-CabanillasF.SantosM. A. D.ZulaufK.WagnerR. (2024). Do you believe it? Green advertising skepticism and perceived value in buying electric vehicles. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 4671–4685.
50.
Higueras-CastilloE.MolinilloS.Coca-StefaniakJ. A.Liébana-CabanillasF. (2020). Potential early adopters of hybrid and electric vehicles in Spain—Towards a customer profile. Sustainability, 12(11), 4345.
51.
Higueras-CastilloE.RamdhonyD.KalinicZ.Liébana-CabanillasF. (2024). Examining the two-dimensional perceived marketplace influence and the role of financial incentives by SEM and ANN. Expert Systems, 41(1), e13480.
52.
Higueras-CastilloE.SinghV.SinghV.Liébana-CabanillasF. (2023). Factors affecting adoption intention of electric vehicle: A cross-cultural study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 29293–29329.
53.
HuX.WangS.ZhouR.TongY.XuL. (2023). Unpacking the effects of information overload on the purchase intention of electric vehicles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(2), 468–482.
JaiswalD.KaushalV.DeshmukhA. K.KantR.KautishP. (2022). What drives electric vehicles in an emerging market?Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 40(6), 738–754.
57.
JoshiY.RahmanZ. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 110–120.
58.
JoshiY.RahmanZ. (2019). Consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour: Modeling the impact of psychological factors. Ecological Economics, 159, 235–243.
59.
KautishP.LavuriR.RoubaudD.GrebinevychO. (2024). Electric vehicles’ choice behaviour: An emerging market scenario. Journal of Environmental Management, 354, 120250.
60.
KautishP.PaçoA.ThaichonP. (2022). Sustainable consumption and plastic packaging: Relationships among product involvement, perceived marketplace influence and choice behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 103032.
61.
KimT.YunS. (2019). How will changes toward pro-environmental behavior play in customers’ perceived value of environmental concerns at coffee shops?Sustainability, 11(14), 3816.
62.
KumarR. R.AlokK. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119911.
63.
LamA. Y.LauM. M.CheungR. (2016). Modelling the relationship among green perceived value, green trust, satisfaction, and repurchase intention of green products. Contemporary Management Research, 12(1), 1–14.
64.
LearyR. B.VannR. J.MittelstaedtJ. D. (2017). Leading the way: Motivating environmental action through perceived marketplace influence. Journal of Business Research, 79, 79–89.
65.
LearyR. B.VannR. J.MittelstaedtJ. D. (2019). Perceived marketplace influence and consumer ethical action. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 53(3), 1117–1145.
66.
LearyR. B.VannR. J.MittelstaedtJ. D.MurphyP. E.Sherry JrJ. F. (2014). Changing the marketplace one behavior at a time: Perceived marketplace influence and sustainable consumption. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1953–1958.
67.
LimW. M.RasulT.KumarS.AlaM. (2021). Past, present, and future of customer engagement. Journal of Business Research, 140, 439–458.
68.
LinJ.LoboA.LeckieC. (2019). The influence of green brand innovativeness and value perception on brand loyalty: The moderating role of green knowledge. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(1), 81–95.
69.
McDonaldH.BiscaiaR.YoshidaM.ConduitJ.DoyleJ. P. (2022). Customer engagement in sport: An updated review and research agenda. Journal of Sport Management, 1(aop), 1–16.
70.
McLeanG. (2018). Examining the determinants and outcomes of mobile app engagement—A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 392–403.
71.
MehrabianA.RussellJ. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
72.
MohammedB. Z.KumarP. M.ThilagaS.BashaM. (2022). An empirical study on customer experience and customer engagement towards electric bikes with reference to Bangalore city. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(6), 4591–4597.
73.
MorganR. M.HuntS. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
74.
MunawarS.YousafH. Q.AhmedM.RehmanS. (2022). Effects of green human resource management on green innovation through green human capital, environmental knowledge, and managerial environmental concern. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52, 141–150.
75.
NitzlC. (2016). The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development. Journal of Accounting Literature, 37, 19–35.
76.
PansariA.KumarV. (2017). Customer engagement: The construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 294–311.
77.
PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P.WilliamsL. J.HuangC.YangJ. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 17–61.
78.
PunjG. N.StaelinR. (1983). A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 366–380.
79.
RaimondoM. A. (2000). The measurement of trust in marketing studies: A review of models and methodologies [Conference session]. 16th IMP-conference, Bath, UK (pp. 1–44). Springer.
80.
RajperS. Z.AlbrechtJ. (2020). Prospects of electric vehicles in the developing countries: A literature review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1906.
81.
ReinartzW.HaenleinM.HenselerJ. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.
82.
RosyidahD. F.RachmawatiI. (2023, May). Applying the stimulus-organism-response framework to investigate influencer attributes on the intention to purchase electric vehicles [Conference session]. Conference on Sustainability and Cutting-Edge Business Technologies (pp. 149–162). Springer Nature Switzerland.
83.
RotterJ. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust 1. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651–665.
84.
SaariU. A.DambergS.FrömblingL.RingleC. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155.
85.
SahinA.ZehirC.KitapciH. (2012). The effects of brand experience and service quality on repurchase intention: The role of brand relationship quality. African Journal of Business Management, 6(45), 11190.
86.
SarstedtM.HairJ. F.RingleC. M.ThieleK. O.GuderganS. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010.
87.
SarstedtM.RingleC. M.HairJ. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of Market Research, 26(1), 1–40.
88.
SchneiderA. B.LeonardB. (2021). From anxiety to control: Mask-wearing, perceived marketplace influence, and emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(1), 97–119.
89.
ShahK. U.AwojobiM.SoomaurooZ. (2022). Electric vehicle adoption in small island economies: Review from a technology transition perspective. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 11(4), e432.
90.
SinghH.SinghV.SinghT.Higueras-CastilloE. (2023). Electric vehicle adoption intention in the Himalayan region using UTAUT2–NAM model. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 11, 100946.
91.
SkinnerB. F. (1963). Operant behavior. American Psychologist, 18(8), 503.
92.
SteenkampJ. B. E.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90.
93.
SukiN. M. (2016). Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. British Food Journal, 118(12), 2893–2910.
94.
SultanaN.AminS.IslamA. (2022). Influence of perceived environmental knowledge and environmental concern on customers’ green hotel visit intention: Mediating role of green trust. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(2), 223–243.
95.
Takács-SántaA. (2007). Barriers to environmental concern. Human Ecology Review, 14(1), 26–38.
96.
TalwarS.JabeenF.TandonA.SakashitaM.DhirA. (2021). What drives willingness to purchase and stated buying behavior toward organic food? A Stimulus–Organism–Behavior–Consequence (SOBC) perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 125882.
97.
TanvirG. S.AktaruzzamanM. (2021). Sustainable green customers’ engagement through social media for business development. International Journal of Innovative Research and Publications, 1(2), 17–28.
98.
TianZ.LuM.ChengQ. (2021). The relationships among mobile travel application attributes, customer engagement, and brand equity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(7), 1–10.
99.
Tumer KabadayiE.Cavdar AksoyN.YaziciN.Kocak AlanA. (2022). Airbnb as a sharing economy-enabled digital service platform: The power of motivational factors and the moderating role of experience. Tourism Economics, 28(3), 748–771.
100.
UllahA.AiminW.AhmedM. (2018). Smart automation, customer experience and customer engagement in electric vehicles. Sustainability, 10(5), 1350.
101.
UllahA.ZhangQ.AhmedM. (2021). The impact of smart connectivity features on customer engagement in electric vehicles. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 203–212.
102.
UpadhyayN.KambleA. (2023). Examining Indian consumer pro-environment purchase intention of electric vehicles: Perspective of stimulus-organism-response. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122344.
103.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139.
104.
WangX. W.CaoY. M.ZhangN. (2021). The influences of incentive policy perceptions and consumer social attributes on battery electric vehicle purchase intentions. Energy Policy, 151, 112163.
105.
WeigelR. H. (1983). Environmental attitudes and the prediction of behavior. New York, NY: Praeger.
106.
WuJ.LiaoH.WangJ. W.ChenT. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37–46.
107.
XiaZ.WuD.ZhangL. (2022). Economic, functional, and social factors influencing electric vehicles’ adoption: An empirical study based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Sustainability, 14(10), 6283.
108.
XuG.WangS.LiJ.ZhaoD. (2020). Moving towards sustainable purchase behavior: Examining the determinants of consumers’ intentions to adopt electric vehicles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 22535–22546.
109.
XuG.WangS.ZhaoD. (2021). Transition to sustainable transport: Understanding the antecedents of consumer’s intention to adopt electric vehicles from the emotional research perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 20362–20374.
110.
YadavR.PathakG. S. (2016). Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 732–739.
111.
YadavR.YadavR. (2024). Are consumers ready to adopt electric vehicles? Analyzing the barriers and motivators associated with electric vehicle adoption in India: Policy implications for various stakeholders. Energy Policy, 190, 114173.
112.
YangS.ChengP.LiJ.WangS. (2019). Which group should policies target? Effects of incentive policies and product cognitions for electric vehicle adoption among Chinese consumers. Energy Policy, 135, 111009.
113.
YenY. S. (2022). Channel integration affects usage intention in food delivery platform services: The mediating effect of perceived value. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(1), 54–73.
114.
ZagzebskiL. (2017). What is knowledge? In GrecoJ.SosaE. (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to epistemology (pp. 92–116). Wiley.
115.
ZhangL.ShaoZ.LiX.FengY. (2021). Gamification and online impulse buying: The moderating effect of gender and age. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102267.
116.
ZhangW.WangS.WanL.ZhangZ.ZhaoD. (2022). Information perspective for understanding consumers’ perceptions of electric vehicles and adoption intentions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, 103157.
