In response to the climate crisis, organizations are encouraging employees to adopt pro-environmental behavior (PEB). While descriptive norm interventions (e.g., many people engaging in PEBs) are generally positive, mixed findings suggest an alternative approach may maximize effects. Using self-concordance theory, we hypothesize that the attribution of normative behavior (intrinsic/extrinsic) interacts with personal values to motivate behavior, especially for those with extrinsic values. In a time-lagged experiment with 1,712 participants, we tested descriptive norms with either intrinsic or extrinsic attributions, a norm-only condition, or no norm. Surprisingly, self-concordant attributions did not increase PEB, and extrinsic attributions led to a greater increase than intrinsic or norm-only conditions. Organizational pro-environmental support correlated independently with PEB but the moderation effect was non-significant. These counterintuitive findings suggest further exploration and implications for future research.
AjzenI.MaddenT. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of experimental social psychology, 22(5), 453–474.
2.
BastiniK.KerschreiterR.LachmannM.ZieglerM.SawertT. (2024). Encouraging individual contributions to net-zero organizations: Effects of behavioral policy interventions and social norms. Journal of Business Ethics, 192(3), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05516-8
3.
BatesonM.NettleD.RobertsG. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2(3), 412–414. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509
4.
BehrendT. S.BakerB. A.ThompsonL. F. (2009). Effects of pro-environmental recruiting messages: The role of organizational reputation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9112-6
5.
BehrendT. S.SharekD. J.MeadeA. W.WiebeE. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
6.
BergerJ.EffersonC.VogtS. (2023). Tipping pro-environmental norm diffusion at scale: opportunities and limitations. Behavioural Public Policy, 7(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.36
7.
BlokV.WesselinkR.StudynkaO.KempR. (2015). Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: A survey on the pro-environmental behaviour of university employees. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.063
8.
BoiralO.PailléP. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: Measurement and validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1138-9
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
11.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
12.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151–192). McGraw-Hill. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07091-021
ColmanA. M. (2009). A dictionary of psychology: Oxford paperback reference (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordreference.com/
15.
CropanzanoR.JamesK.CiteraM. (1993). A goal hierarchy model of personality, motivation, and leadership. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 267–322).
16.
DavisM. C.ChallengerR. (2013). Environmentally sustainable work behavior. In FloodP. C.FreeneyY. (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of management: Organizational behavior (3rd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 1–10).
17.
DavisM. C.UnsworthK. L.RussellS. V.GalvanJ. J. (2020). Can green behaviors really be increased for all employees? Trade-offs for “deep greens” in a goal-oriented green human resource management intervention. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2367
18.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
19.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
20.
DielK.GrelleS.HofmannW. (2021). A motivational framework of social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1415–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000204
21.
DumasT. M.Maxwell-SmithM.DavisJ. P.GiuliettiP. A. (2017). Lying or longing for likes? Narcissism, peer belonging, loneliness and normative versus deceptive like-seeking on Instagram in emerging adulthood. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.037
22.
DuriezB.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB.De WitteH. (2007). The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: Their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 757–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00456.x
23.
EderP.EisenbergerR. (2008). Perceived organizational support: Reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 34(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307309259
24.
EgriC. P.HermanS. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571–604. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556356
EjelövE.BergquistM.HanslaA.NilssonA. (2022). Why are they eco-friendly? Attributing eco-friendly descriptive norms to intrinsic motivation increases pro-environmental purchase intention. PLOS ONE, 17(10), Article e0265839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265839
27.
FarrowK.GrolleauG.IbanezL. (2017). Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
30.
GeiserC. (2010). Datenanalyse mit MPlus: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (1st ed.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Springer Fachmedien.
31.
GeorgeN. A.AboobakerN.EdwardM. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment: Effects of CSR attitude, organizational trust and identification. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-04-2020-0057
32.
GoldsteinN. J.CialdiniR. B.GriskeviciusV. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910
33.
GravesL. M.SarkisJ.ZhuQ. (2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.van den BerghB. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0017346
HicklentonC.HineD. W.LoiN. M. (2019). Can work climate foster pro-environmental behavior inside and outside of the workplace?PLOS ONE, 14(10), Article e0223774.
JaichH.JastramS. M.BlindK. (2023). Spillover of social norms at work on employees’ self-reported private sphere pro-environmental behaviour: A mixed method investigation. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 75(4), 519–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-023-00167-x
41.
JenkinsG. D.JR.MitraA.GuptaN.ShawJ. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.777
42.
JenoL. M.DettweilerU.GrytnesJ. -A. (2020). The effects of a goal-framing and need-supportive app on undergraduates’ intentions, effort, and achievement in mobile science learning. Computers & Education, 159, Article 104022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104022
43.
KaidaN.KaidaK. (2016). Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y
44.
KasserT.RyanR. M. (1993). Dark side of American Dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.
45.
KasserT.RyanR. M. (1996). Further examining the American Dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(3), 280–287.
46.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L.SimpsonJ. A. (2020). Dyadic data analysis. Methodology in the social sciences. Guilford Press.
KouchakiM. (2011). Vicarious moral licensing: The influence of others’ past moral actions on moral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(4), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024552
LambW. F.MattioliG.LeviS.RobertsJ. T.CapstickS.CreutzigF.MinxJ. C.Müller-HansenF.CulhaneT.SteinbergerJ. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, Article e17.
51.
LasarovW.MaiR.HoffmannS. (2022). The backfire effect of sustainable social cues. New evidence on social moral licensing. Ecological Economics, 195, Article 107376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107376
52.
LewisN. (2021). Experiences of upward social comparison in entertainment contexts: Emotions, state self-esteem, and enjoyment. The Social Science Journal, 58(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.04.011
LindenbergS.StegL. (2014). Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior. In van TrijpH. (Ed.), Encouraging sustainable behavior: Psychology and the environment (pp. 37–54). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203141182-6
56.
LingM.XuL. (2021). How and when financial incentives crowd out pro-environmental motivation: A longitudinal quasi-experimental study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, Article 101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101715
57.
LittleB. R.LecciL.WatkinsonB. (1992). Personality and personal projects: Linking big five and PAC units of analysis. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 501–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00982.x
58.
LuH.LiuX.ChenH.LongR. (2019). Employee-organization pro-environmental values fit and pro-environmental behavior: The role of supervisors’ personal values. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 519–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0007-z
59.
MakiA.BurnsR. J.HaL.RothmanA. J. (2016). Paying people to protect the environment: A meta-analysis of financial incentive interventions to promote proenvironmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.006
60.
MariqueG.StinglhamberF.DesmetteD.CaesensG.de ZanetF. (2013). The relationship between perceived organizational support and affective commitment. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 68–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112457200
61.
MatusikJ. G.HollenbeckJ. R.MitchellR. (2020). Latent change score models for the study of development and dynamics in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1–30.
MorrisonT. L.MorrisonR. L. (1978). Self-esteem, need for approval and self-estimates of academic performance. Psychological Reports, 43(2), 503–507. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.503
65.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2008). Mplus user’s guide.
66.
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
67.
NortonT. A.ZacherH.AshkanasyN. M. (2012). On the importance of pro-environmental organizational climate for employee green behavior. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 497–500.
68.
NortonT. A.ZacherH.AshkanasyN. M. (2014). Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: The mediating role of work climate perceptions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.008
69.
OlivierJ.NorbergM. (2010). Positively skewed data: Revisiting the box-cox power transformation. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.846
70.
PailléP.BoiralO. (2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work: Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.014
71.
PailléP.Mejía-MorelosJ. H. (2014). Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviours at work: The moderating influence of psychological contract breach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.004
72.
PapagiannakisG.LioukasS. (2012). Values, attitudes and perceptions of managers as predictors of corporate environmental responsiveness. Journal of Environmental Management, 100, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.023
73.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. -Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
74.
PryorR. G. L. (1982). Values, preferences, needs, work ethics, and orientations to work: Toward a conceptual and empirical integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 20(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(82)90062-8
75.
RatelleJ. T.WittichC. M.YuR. C.NewmanJ. S.JenkinsS. M.BeckmanT. J. (2017). Relationships between reflection and behavior change in CME. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000162
76.
RichterI.ThøgersenJ.KlöcknerC. A. (2018). A social norms intervention going wrong: Boomerang effects from descriptive norms information. Sustainability, 10(8), Article 2848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082848
77.
RobertsonJ. I.BarlingJ. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 176–194.
78.
RuepertA. M.KeizerK.StegL. (2017). The relationship between Corporate Environmental Responsibility, employees’ biospheric values and pro-environmental behaviour at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.006
79.
SaloveyP.RodinJ. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.780
80.
SchwartzS. H. (1970). Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: An experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029614
81.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482
84.
SheldonK. M.EmmonsR. A. (1995). Comparing differentiation and integration within personal goal systems. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(1), 39–46.
85.
SheldonK. M.KasserT. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 531–543.
86.
SmithJ. R.LouisW. R.TerryD. J.GreenawayK. H.ClarkeM. R.ChengX. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001
StetsJ. E.CarterM. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411433762
89.
ThøgersenJ.NobletC. (2012). Does green consumerism increase the acceptance of wind power?Energy Policy, 51, 854–862.
90.
ToothakerL. E. (1993). Multiple comparison procedures (No. 89). Sage.
91.
TourangeauRipsJ.L.RasinskiK. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.
92.
TrelohanM. (2022). Do women engage in pro-environmental behaviours in the public sphere due to social expectations? The effects of social norm-based persuasive messages. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(1), 134–148.
93.
UnanueW.VignolesV. L.DittmarH.VansteenkisteM. (2016). Life goals predict environmental behavior: cross-cultural and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 10–22.
94.
UnsworthK. L.DmitrievaA.AdriasolaE. (2013). Changing behaviour: Increasing the effectiveness of workplace interventions in creating pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1837
95.
UnsworthK. L.McNeillI. M. (2017). Increasing pro-environmental behaviors by increasing self-concordance: Testing an intervention. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000155
96.
UnsworthK. L.YeoG.BeckJ. (2014). Multiple goals: A review and derivation of general principles. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(8), 1064–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1963
97.
VallerandR. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
98.
Van den BroeckA.FerrisD. L.ChangC. -H.RosenC. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
99.
Van Der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018
100.
VansteenkisteM.LensW.DeciE. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
101.
VansteenkisteM.TimmermansT.LensW.SoenensB.Van den BroeckA. (2008). Does extrinsic goal framing enhance extrinsic goal-oriented individuals’ learning and performance? An experimental test of the match perspective versus self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.387
102.
van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2012). On conviction's collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x
103.
VerfuerthC.Gregory-SmithD. (2018). Spillover of pro-environmental behaviour. In V. K. Wells, D. Gregory-Smith & D. Manika (Eds.), Research handbook on employee pro-environmental behaviour (pp. 455–484). Edward Elgar Publishing.
104.
WalterS. L.SeibertS. E.GoeringD.O’BoyleE. H. (2019). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge?Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9552-y
105.
WebbT.JosephJ.YardleyL.MichieS. (2010). Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(1), Article1376. https://www.jmir.org/2010/1/e4/jmir_v12i1e4_app2.pdf
106.
WhiteK.HabibR.DahlD. W. (2020). A review and framework for thinking about the drivers of prosocial consumer behavior. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/706782
107.
WolstenholmeE.PoortingaW.WhitmarshL. (2020). Two birds, one stone: the effectiveness of health and environmental messages to reduce meat consumption and encourage pro-environmental behavioral spillover. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 577111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577111
108.
WoodJ. V.LockwoodP. (1999). Social comparisons in dysphoric and low self-esteem people. In KowalskiR. M.LearyM. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of emotional and behavioral problems: Interfaces of social and clinical psychology (1st ed., pp. 97–135). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10320-004
109.
ZhangY.DongY.WangR.JiangJ. (2024). Can organizations shape eco-friendly employees? Organizational support improves pro-environmental behaviors at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93, Article 102200.
110.
ZhongC. -B.BohnsV. K.GinoF. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360754
111.
ZibarrasL. D.CoanP. (2015). Hrm practices used to promote pro-environmental behavior: A UK survey. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(16), 2121–2142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.972429
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
