When crisis strikes, where do evacuees go? This question affects how policymakers and first responders allocate their time, funds, and resources after disaster. While past research compared evacuation rates of cities within the same disaster, evacuation among different types of disasters remain under-examined. This mixed methods study compares evacuation patterns from 7,631 cities among 10 major disasters in the US and Japan between 2019 and 2020, combining social network analysis, modeling, and visualization. This study highlights that evacuation from some hazards is more alike than others; large, sprawling disasters, including some storms, fires, and power outages trigger both clustered and dispersed evacuation networks, while smaller, focused disaster result in mainly dispersed evacuation networks. Further, cities with similar levels of social capital tend to see greater evacuation between them. By uncovering the different shapes and drivers of evacuation networks across different disasters, scholars can clarify where evacuees go and which kinds of cities need additional support after crisis.
AldrichD. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.
2.
AldrichD. P. (2019). Black wave: How connections and governance shaped recovery from Japan’s 3.11 disasters. University of Chicago Press.
3.
AldrichD. P.CrookK. (2008). Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: Siting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans. Political Research Quarterly, 61(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907312983
4.
AldrichD. P.MeyerM. A. (2015). Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 254–269.
5.
AldrichD. P.Page-TanC.FraserT. (2018). A Janus-faced resource: Social capital and resilience trade-offs. In TrumpB. D.FlorinM.-V.LinkovI. (Eds.), IRGC resource guide on resilience (Vol. 2): Domains of resilience for complex interconnected systems. EPFL International Risk Governance Center.
6.
BaileyM.CaoR.KuchlerT.StroebelJ.WongA. (2018). Social connectedness: Measurement, determinants, and effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 259–280.
7.
BankoffG. (2001). Rendering the world unsafe: Vulnerability as western discourse. Disasters, 25(1), 19–35.
8.
BaselliniU.Alburez-GutierrezD.Del FavaE.PerrottaD.BonettiM.CamardaC. G.ZagheniE. (2021). Linking excess mortality to mobility data during the first wave of COVID-19 in England and Wales. SSM - Population Health, 14, 100799.
9.
BurnsideR. (2006). Leaving the big easy: An examination of the hurricane evacuation behavior of New Orleans residents before hurricane Katrina. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 12(2), 49–61.
10.
BurtR. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.
11.
CahyantI.Pennington-GrayL.ThapaB.SrinivasanS.VillegasJ.MatyasC.KiousisS. (2016). Predicting information seeking regarding hurricane evacuation in the destination. Tourism Management, 52, 264–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.014
12.
ChoiratC.HonakerJ.ImaiK.KingG.LauO. (2017). Zelig: Everyone’s statistical software, version 5.1.4.90000. http://zeligproject.org/
13.
CollinsJ.ErsingR.PolenA. (2017). Evacuation decision-making during hurricane Matthew: An assessment of the effects of social connections. Weather, Climate, & Society, 9, 769–776.
14.
CollinsJ.ErsingR.PolenA.SaundersM.SenkbeilJ. (2018). The effects of social connections on evacuation decision making during hurricane Irma. Weather, Climate, & Society, 10(3), 459–469.
15.
CollinsJ.PolenA.McSweeneyK.Colon-BurgosD.JerniganI. (2021). Hurricane risk perceptions and evacuation decision-making in the age of COVID-19. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 102(4), E836–E848.
16.
CutterS. L.EmrichC. T.MitchellJ. T.BoruffB. J.GallM.SchmidtleinM. C.BurtonC. G.MeltonG. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242–261.
17.
CutterS. L.EmrichC. T.MitchellJ. T.BoruffB. J.GallM.SchmidtleinM. C.BurtonC. G.MeltonG. (2006). The long road home: Race, class, and recovery from hurricane Katrina. Environment, 48(2), 8–20.
18.
CutterS. L.FinchC. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(7), 2301–2306.
19.
DanchevV.PorterM. A. (2018). Neither global nor local: Heterogeneous connectivity in spatial network structures of world migration. Social Networks, 53, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.06.003
20.
Dominey-HowesD.Gorman-MurrayA.McKinnonS. (2016). Emergency management response and recovery plans in relation to sexual and gender minorities in New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 16, 1–11.
21.
EagleN.MacyM.ClaxtonR. (2010). Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981), 1029–1031.
22.
ElliottJ. R.HaneyT. J.Sams-AbiodunP. (2010). Limits to social capital: Comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighborhoods devastated by hurricane Katrina. The Sociological Quarterly, 51(4), 624–648.
23.
EnarsonE. (1998). Through women’s eyes: A gendered research agenda for disaster social science. Disasters, 22(2), 157–173.
24.
Facebook. (2020). Facebook data for good project. Author. Retrieved May 20, 2020, from https://dataforgood.fb.com/
25.
FarmerA. K.DeYoungS. E.WachtendorfT. (2016). Pets and evacuation: An ongoing challenge in disasters. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 13(4), 20160051.
26.
FothergillA.MaestasE. G.DarlingtonJ. D. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), 156–73.
27.
FraserT. (2021). Japanese social capital and social vulnerability indices: Measuring drivers of community resilience 2000–2017. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 52, 101965.
28.
FraserT.AldrichD. P.MorikawaL. (2022). Do all roads lead to Sapporo? The role of linking and bridging ties in evacuation decisions. Ecology & Society. In Press.
29.
FraserT.CunninghamL.NasongoA. (2021). Build back better? Effects of crisis on climate change adaptation through solar power in Japan and the United States. Global Environmental Politics, 21(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00588
30.
FraserT.MorikawaL.AldrichD. P. (2021). Rumor has it: The role of social ties and misinformation in evacuation to nearby shelters after disaster. Climate Risk Management, 33, 100320.
31.
FraserT.Page-TanC.AldrichD. P. (2022). Social capital’s Impact on COVID-19 Outcomes at Local Levels. Scientific Reports. In Press.
32.
FussellE.SastryN.VanLandinghamM. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Population & Environment, 31(1–3), 20–42.
33.
GehlotH.SadriA. M.UkkusuriS. V. (2019). Joint modeling of evacuation departure and travel times in hurricanes. Transportation, 46, 2419–2440.
HorneyJ. A.MacDonaldP. D. M.Van WilligenM.BerkeP. R.KaufmanJ. S. (2010). Individual actual or perceived property flood risk: Did it predict evacuation from hurricane Isabel in North Carolina, 2003?Risk Analysis, 30(3), 501–511.
36.
HuH. B.WangX. F. (2009). Disassortative mixing in online social networks. Europhysics Letters, 86, 18003.
37.
HuangS.LindellM. K.PraterC. S. (2016). Who leaves and who stays? A review and statistical meta-analysis of hurricane evacuation studies. Environment and Behavior, 48(8), 991–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515578485
38.
KakimotoR.FujimiT.YoshidaM.KimH. (2016). Factors promoting and impeding precautionary evacuation behavior. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 20(1), 25–37.
39.
KingG.TomzM.WittenbergJ. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347–355.
40.
KyneD.AldrichD. P. (2020). Capturing bonding, bridging, and linking social capital through publicly available data. Risks, Hazards, & Crisis in Public Policy, 11(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12183
41.
LazerD.RadfordJ. (2017). Data ex machina: Introduction to big data. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 19–39.
LeungC.ChauH. (2007). Weighted assortative and disassortative networks model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 378(2), 591–602.
44.
LongE. F.ChenK. M.RohlaR. (2020). Political storms: Emergent partisan skepticism of hurricane risks. Science Advances, 6(37), 1–7.
45.
MaasP.IyerS.GrosA.ParkW.McGormanL.NayakC.DowA. P. (2019). Facebook Disaster Maps: Aggregat Insights for Crisis Response Recovery. Paper presented at the. Proceedings of the 16th ISCRAM Conference, 1–12.
46.
MartinY.LiZ.CutterS. L. (2017). Leveraging Twitter to gauge evacuation compliance: Spatiotemporal analysis of hurricane Matthew. PLoS One, 12(7), e0181701.
47.
McGintyM. D.BurkeT. A.ResnickB.BarnettD. J.SmithK. C.RutkowL. (2017). Decision processes and determinants of hospital evacuation and shelter-in-place during hurricane Sandy. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 23(1), 29–36.
48.
McMillanC. (2022). Worth the weight: Conceptualizing and measuring homophily in weighted social networks. Social Networks, 68, 139–147.
49.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
50.
Metaxa-KakavouliD.MaasP.AldrichD. P. (2018). How social ties influence hurricane evacuation behavior. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 122.
51.
MillsB. J.PeeplesM. A.AragonL. D.BelloradoB. A.ClarkJ. J.GiomiE.WindesT. C. (2018). Evaluating Chaco migration scenarios using dynamic social network analysis. Antiquity, 92(364), 922–939.
52.
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2019). Survey on time and information behavior of information and communication media. Author. Retrieved May 1, 2020, from https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000644166.pdf
53.
MoussaïdM.KapadiaM.ThrashT.SumnerR. W.GrossM.HelbingD.HölscherC. (2016). Crowd behaviour during high-stress evacuations in an immersive virtual environment. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 13(122), 20160414.
54.
NaH. S.BanerjeeA. (2015). A disaster evacuation network model for transporting multiple priority evacuees. IIE Transactions, 47(11), 1287–1299.
55.
NakaiH.TsukasakiK.KyotaK.ItataniT.NihonyanagiR.ShinmeiY.YasuokaS. (2016). Factors related to evacuation intentions of power-dependent nursing home care patients in Japan. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 33, 196–208.
56.
NewmanM. E. (2003). Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E, 67(2), 026126.
57.
NewmanM. E. (2010). Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
58.
PeiS.DahlK. A.YamanaT. K.LickerR.ShamanJ. (2020). Compound risks of hurricane evacuation amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. GeoHealth, 4, e2020GH000319.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
61.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
62.
QiW.AbelG. J.MuttarakR.LiuS. (2017). Circular visualization of China’s internal migration flows 2010–2015. Environment and Planning A, 49(11), 2432–2436.
63.
RakerE. J.ElliottJ. R. (2018). Attitudes toward mass arrivals: Variations by racial, spatial, and temporal distances to incoming disaster evacuees. Social Science Quarterly, 99(3), 1200–1213.
64.
RenY.Ercsey-RavaszM.WangP.GonzálezM. C.ToroczkaiZ. (2014). Predicting commuter flows in spatial networks using a radiation model based on temporal ranges. Nature Communications, 5, 5347. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6347
65.
RiadJ. K.NorrisF. H.RubackR. B. (1999). Predicting evacuation in two major disasters: Risk perception, social influence, and access to resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 918–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00132.x
66.
SadriA. M.UkkusuriS. V.GladwinH. (2017). The role of social networks and information sources on hurricane evacuation decision making. Natural Hazards Review, 18(3), 04017005.
67.
SalganikM. J. (2017). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton University Press.
68.
SalvatiP.PetrucciO.RossiM.BianchiC.PasquaA. A.GuzzettiF. (2018). Gender, age and circumstances analysis of flood and landslide fatalities in Italy. Science of the Total Environment, 610–611, 867–879.
69.
SaramäkiJ.KiveläM.OnnelaJ. P.KaskiK.KerteszJ. (2007). Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Physical Review E, 75(2), 027105.
70.
ShannonC. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
71.
ShojiM.MurataA. (2020). Social capital encourages disaster evacuation: Evidence from a cyclone in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies, 57(5), 790–806.
72.
SiminiF.GonzálezM. C.MaritanA.BarabásiA. L. (2012). A Universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature, 484, 96–100.
73.
SmileyK.HowellJ.ElliotJ. (2018). Disasters, local organizations, and poverty in the USA, 1998 to 2015. Population and Environment, 40(2), 115–135.
74.
SmithS. K.McCartyC. (2009). Fleeing the storm(s): An examination of evacuation behavior during Florida’s 2004 hurricane season. Demography, 46(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0048
75.
StefanouliM.PolyzosS. (2017). Gravity vs radiation model: Two approaches on commuting in Greece. Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.069
76.
SzreterSWoolcockM. (2004) Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh013
77.
TsaiL. (2007). Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review, 101(2), 355–372.
78.
Uscher-PinesL.HausmanA. J.PowellS.DeMaraP.HeakeG.HaganM. G. (2009). Disaster preparedness of households with special needs in Southeastern Pennsylvania. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 37(3), 227–230.
79.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
80.
WhiteheadJ. C.EdwardsB.Van WilligenM.AmioloJ. R.WilsonK.SmithK. T. (2000). Heading for higher ground: Factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior. Environmental Hazards, 2, 133–142.
81.
WindzioM. (2018). The network of global migration 1990–2013. Using ERGMs to test theories of migration between countries. Social Networks, 53, 20–29.
82.
YabeT.UkkusuriS. V.RaoP. S. C. (2019). Mobile phone data reveals the importance of pre-disaster inter-city social ties for recovery after Hurricane Maria. Applied Network Science, 4(98), 1–18.
83.
ZahranS.TavaniD.WeilerS. (2013). Daily variation in natural disaster casualties: Information flows, safety, and opportunity costs in Tornado versus hurricane strikes. Risk Analysis, 33(7), 1265–1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01920.x
84.
ZhaoH.ThrashT.KapadiaM.WolffK.HölscherC.HelbingD.SchinaziV. R. (2020). Assessing crowd management strategies for the 2010 love Parade disaster using computer simulations and virtual reality. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 17(167), 20200116.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
