This study examined the accuracy with which Texas coastal residents were able to locate their residences on hurricane risk area maps provided to them. Overall, only 36% of the respondents correctly identified their risk areas and another 28% were off by one risk area. Risk area accuracy shows minimal correlations with respondents’ demographic characteristics but is negatively correlated with the respondent’s previous hurricane exposure and evacuation experience. Ultimately, risk area accuracy appears to have little significance because it is uncorrelated with evacuation expectations. Instead, the latter were related to respondents’ previous hazard experience and expected evacuation context.
Alington, D. E., Leaf, R. C., & Monaghan, J. R. (1992). Effects of stimulus, color, pattern and practices on sex differences in mental rotations task performance. Journal of Psychology, 126, 539-553.
2.
Baker, E. J. (1979). Predicting response to hurricane warnings: A reanalysis of data from four studies. Mass Emergencies, 4, 9-24.
3.
Baker, E. J. (1991). Hurricane evacuation behavior, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9, 287-310.
4.
Boardman, D. (1990). Graphicacy revisited: Mapping abilities and gender differences, Educational Review, 42, 57-64.
5.
Curtin, R., Presser, S., & Singer, E. (2000). The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 413-428.
6.
Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Springer.
7.
Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system response to disaster. New York: Springer.
8.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Fitzpatrick, C., & Mileti, D. S. (1991). Motivating public evacuation. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9, 137-152.
10.
Gladwin, C. H., Gladwin, H., & Peacock, W. G. (2001). Modeling hurricane evacuation decisions with ethnographic methods. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 19, 117-143.
11.
Hirtle, S. C., & Hudson, J. (1991). Acquisition of spatial knowledge for routes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 335-345.
12.
Johnson, J. T., Verdi, M. P., Kealy, W. A., Stock, W. A., & Haygood, R. C. (1995). Brief research report: Map perspective and the learning of text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 457-463.
13.
Kang, J. E., Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2004). Hurricane evacuation expectations and actual behavior in Hurricane Lili. College Station: Texas A & M University Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center.
14.
Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148.
15.
Kozlowski, L. T., & Bryant, K. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 590-598.
16.
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1996). How cognitive maps are learned and remembered. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 86, 123-145.
17.
Kulhavy, R. W., Stock, W. A., Werner-Bellman, L., & Klein, J. D. (1993). Properties of maps that improve recall of associated text. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 20, 151-156.
18.
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (1992). Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
19.
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2000). Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32, 590-630.
20.
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2004). Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2000). Household adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: A comparison of residents in two states. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18, 317-338.
22.
Lindell, M. K., Prater, C. S., Sanderson, W. G., Jr., Lee, H. M., Zhang, Y., Mohite, A., et al. (2001). Texas gulf coast residents’ expectations and intentions regarding hurricane evacuation. College Station: Texas A & M University Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center.
23.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 233-346). New York: Random House.
24.
Mileti, D. S., Drabek, T. E., & Haas, J. E. (1975). Human systems in extreme environments. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Institute of Behavior Science.
25.
Mileti, D. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. (1993). The great earthquake prediction experiment. Boulder, CO: Westview.
26.
Mileti, D. S., & Peek, L. (2000). The social psychology of public response to warnings of a nuclear power plant accident. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 75, 181-194.
27.
Mileti, D. S., & Sorensen, J. H. (1988). Why people take precautions against natural disasters. In N. Weinstein (Ed.), Taking care: Why people take precautions (pp. 296-320). New York: Cambridge.
28.
Montello, D. R., & Pick, H. L. (1993). Integrating knowledge of vertically aligned large-scale spaces. Environment and Behavior, 25, 457-484.
29.
Neisser, U. (1987). Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Patton, J. C., & Slocum, T. A. (1985). Spatial pattern recall: An analysis of the aesthetic use of color. Cartographica, 22, 70-87.
31.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (1997). Aged citizens in the warning phase of disasters: Reexamining the evidence. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 44, 257-267.
33.
Potash, L. M., Farrell, J. P., & Jeffrey, T. (1978). A technique for assessing map relief legibility. The Cartographic Journal, 15, 28-35.
34.
Scali, R. M., Brownlow, S., & Hicks, J. L. (2000). Gender differences in spatial task performance as a function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles, 43, 359-376.
35.
Schmitz, S. (1999). Gender differences in acquisition of environmental knowledge related to way finding behavior, spatial anxiety and self estimated environmental competencies. Sex Roles, 41, 71-91.
36.
Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representations: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
37.
Sheppard, B., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325-343.
38.
Shurleff, M., & Geiselman, R. E. (1986). A human performance based evaluation of topographic maps and map symbols with novice users. The Cartographic Journal, 23, 52-55.
39.
Slovic, P., Kunreuther, H., & White, G. F. (1974). Decision processes, rationality and adjustments to natural hazards. In G. F. White (Ed.), Natural hazards: Local, national and global (pp. 80-86). New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
Tierney, K. J., Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry.
41.
Tolman, E. C. (1949). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208.
42.
Triandis, H. (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. In H. E. Howe, Jr. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979 (vol. 27, pp. 195-259). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
43.
Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility: Way finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior, 13, 189-204.
44.
Zhang, Y., Prater, C. S., & Lindell, M. K. (2004). Risk area accuracy and evacuation from Hurricane Bret. Natural Hazards Review, 8, 115-120.
