Amid increasing interests in social metrics within green buildings, this work focuses on buildings designed to enhance environmental education, here called “Teaching Green Buildings” (TGBs). This study examines one school building at three points in time before and after the move into a new construction TGB. Middle school students here and at a local, comparison Non-Green School (N = 264) took a survey measuring outcomes of green building knowledge (GBK) and environmentally responsible behaviors (ERBs). Regression results showed that GBK is significantly higher for students in the Green School compared with the Non-Green School, but is not increasing over time for students at the Green School. No differences were detected in ERBs across schools or time, and it was found that school practices, more than the green building itself, were pivotal in student choices to conduct ERBs at school.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). A theory of reasoned action. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
ArdoinN. (2009). Behavior change theories and free choice environmental learning. In FalkJ. H.HeimlichJ. E.FoutzS. (Eds.), Free choice learning and the environment (pp. 57-73). New York, NY: Alta Mira Press.
4.
BerkowitzA. R.FordM. E.BrewerC. A. (2005). A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy, and environmental citizenship in environmental education. In JohnsonE.MappinM. (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 227-266). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.2980/1195-6860(2006)13[423:eeaacp]2.0.co;2
5.
BluhmW. J.HungerfordH. R.McBethW. C.VolkT. L. (1995). A final report on development and pilot-testing of the “Middle School Environmental Literacy Instrument.” In WilkeR. (Ed.), Environmental literacy/needs assessment project: Final report. Stevens Point: University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point.
6.
ChawlaL. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21. doi:10.1080/00958969809599114
ColeL. B. (2014). The teaching green school building: A framework for linking architecture and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 20, 836-857. doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.833586
9.
ColeL. B. (2015). Green building literacy in the school building: A study of five middle schools in the United States. Children, Youth and Environments, 25, 145-174. doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.3.0145
10.
ColeL. B.AltenburgerE. (2019). Framing the teaching green building: Environmental education through multiple channels in the school environment. Environmental Education Research, 25, 1654-1673. doi:10.1080/13504622.2017.1398817
CranzG.LindsayG.MorhayimL.LinA. (2013). Communicating sustainability: A postoccupancy evaluation of the David Brower Center. Environment and Behavior, 46, 826-847. doi:10.1177/0013916513475449
13.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (2008). Introduction to classical & modern test theory. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
14.
DayJ. K.GundersonD. E. (2015). Understanding high performance buildings: The link between occupant knowledge of passive design systems, corresponding behaviors, occupant comfort and environmental satisfaction. Building and Environment, 84, 114-124. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.003
15.
De YoungR. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick: The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior, 25, 485-505. doi:10.1177/0013916593253003
16.
De YoungR. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00181
17.
ErdoganM.MarcinkowskiT. (2015). Development and validation of Children’s Environmental Affect (attitude, sensitivity and willingness to take action) Scale. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11, 577-588. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1347a
18.
FalkJ. H.DierkingL.FoutzS. (2007). In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press. doi:10.5860/choice.45-1829
19.
FalkJ. H.HeimlichJ. E.FoutzS. (2009). Free-choice learning and the environment. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press. doi:10.5860/choice.47-2135
20.
GillZ. M.TierneyM. J.PeggI. M.AllanN. (2010). Low-energy dwellings: The contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Research & Information, 38, 491-508. doi:10.1080/09613218.2010.505371
21.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
HamiltonE. M. (2018). Positive sustainable built environments: The cognitive and behavioral affordances of environmentally responsible behavior in green residence halls (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
23.
HiggsA. L.McMillanV. M. (2006). Teaching through modeling: Four schools’ experiences in sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38, 39-53. doi:10.3200/joee.38.1.39-53
24.
HinesJ.HungerfordH.TomeraA. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8. doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
25.
HoesP.HensenJ. L. M.LoomansM. G. L. C.de VriesB.BourgeoisD. (2009). User behavior in whole building simulation. Energy and Buildings, 41, 295-302. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.09.008
26.
HungerfordH. R.VolkT. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-22. doi:10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
27.
IzadpanahiP.ElkadiH.TuckerR. (2017). Greenhouse affect: The relationship between the sustainable design of schools and children’s environmental attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 23, 901-918. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1072137
28.
KaiserF. G.WölfingS.FuhrerU. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1-19. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0107
29.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116
30.
Kola-OlusanyaA. (2005). Free-choice environmental education: Understanding where children learn outside of school. Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 297-307. doi:10.1080/13504620500081152
31.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
32.
KongS. Y.RaoS. P.Abdul-RahmanH.WangC. (2014). School as 3-D textbook for environmental education: Design model transforming physical environment to knowledge transmission instrument. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 1-15. doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0064-2
33.
KönigA. (2013). Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities: The role of living laboratories. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781781003640
34.
KrathwohlD. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 212-218. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
35.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. doi:10.2307/2529310
36.
LorenzenJ. A. (2012). Green and smart: The co-construction of users and technology. Human Ecology Review, 19, 25-36.
37.
MaloneK.TranterP. J. (2003). School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9, 283-303. doi:10.1080/13504620303459
38.
MarcinkowskiT. (2005). Predictors of responsible environmental behavior: A review of three dissertation studies. In HungerfordH.BluhmW.VolkT.RamseyJ. (Eds.), Essential readings in environmental education (pp. 247-276). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.
39.
MarcinkowskiT. (2010). Major features of environmental literacy. Melbourne: Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Florida Institute of Technology.
40.
McCunnL. J.GiffordR. (2012). Do green offices affect employee engagement and environmental attitudes?Architectural Science Review, 55, 128-134. doi:10.1080/00038628.2012.667939
41.
NairP.FieldingR. (2005). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools. Minneapolis, MN: Designshare.
42.
NunnallyJ. C. (1970). Introduction to psychological measurement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
43.
OrrD. W. (1997). Architecture as pedagogy II. Conservation Biology, 11, 597-600. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.011003597.x
44.
OrrD. W. (2002). Four challenges of sustainability. Conservation Biology, 16, 1457-1460. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01668.x
45.
OrrD. W. (2006). Design on the edge: The making of a high-performance building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/2363.001.0001
46.
OzgunerH.CukurD.AktenM. (2011). The role of landscape and urban planning disciplines to encourage environmental education among primary school children. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3, 369-386.
47.
PaoneA.BacherJ. (2018). The impact of building occupant behavior on energy efficiency and methods to influence it: A review of the state of the art. Energies, 11, 953-963. doi:10.3390/en11040953
48.
RigolonA. (2012). A greener future: The active role of place in enhancing ecoliteracy in children. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 29,181-203.
49.
RobinsonJ. P.LubienskiS. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 268-302. doi:10.3102/0002831210372249
50.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 221-279). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60358-5
51.
Seibold-BultmannU. (2007). What does sustainability look like? Green architecture as an aesthetic proposition. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(1), 3-6. doi:10.1179/030801807X183614
52.
ShiaoK. Y.LinM. L.SungQ. C. (2013). Curriculum innovation for fostering green building literacy in general education. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 284-287, 1290-1294. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.284-287.1290
53.
SteinbergD.PatchanM.SchunnC.LandisA. (2009). Determining adequate information for green building occupant training materials. Journal of Green Building, 4, 143-150. doi:10.3992/jgb.4.3.143
54.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
55.
StevensJ. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
TannerR. T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20-24. doi:10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386
57.
TaylorA. P. (1993). The learning environment as a three-dimensional textbook. Children’s Environments, 10, 170-179.
58.
TranterP. J.MaloneK. (2004). Geographies of environmental learning: An exploration of children’s use of school grounds. Children’s Geographies, 2, 131-155. doi:10.1080/1473328032000168813
59.
TuckerR.IzadpanahiP. (2017). Live green, think green: Sustainable school architecture and children’s environmental attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 209-216. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.003
WatsonL.HegtvedtK. A.JohnsonC.ParrisC. L.SubramanyamS. (2017). When legitimacy shapes environmentally responsible behaviors: Considering exposure to university sustainability initiatives. Education Sciences, 7(1), 13-30. doi:10.3390/educsci7010013
63.
WuD. W. L.DiGiacomoA.KingstoneA. (2013). A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e53856. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053856
64.
WuD. W. L.DiGiacomoA.LenkicP. J.WongV. K.KingstoneA. (2016). Being in a “green” building elicits “greener” recycling, but not necessarily “better” recycling. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0145737. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145737
65.
WuS. R.GreavesM.ChenJ.GradyS. C. (2017). Green buildings need green occupants: A research framework through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour. Architectural Science Review, 60(1), 5-14. doi:10.1080/00038628.2016.1197097
66.
ZeleznyL. C.ChuaP. P.AldrichC. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443-457. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.0017
