In the operating room (OR), opaque drapes are hung between the anesthesia workstation and the operating table. Because OR teams are transient and hierarchical, social order is continuously being negotiated around this partition. We hypothesized that drape transparency, a tool for reimagining the physical and symbolic confines of the OR, might alter behavior. Due to the proximity of anesthesia providers to the drape, we examined how the drape’s transparency affected “social” and “case-related” communication between them and clinicians from surgery and nursing. We observed 58 surgical cases using an OR ethogram to document interprofessional communications (344 exchanges) involving the anesthesia provider. The effect of the type drape showed a statistically significant, GzMLM F(1, 342) = 4.924, p = .027, increase only for “social” communication. The frequency of “social” communication, known to enhance collegiality, was greater when a transparent drape was substituted for the opaque drape (34.9% vs. 21.3%, respectively).
BharathanR.AggarwalR.DarziA. (2013). Operating room of the future. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.11.003
5.
BooijL. H. (2007). Conflicts in the operating theatre. Current Opinion in Anes-thesiology, 20, 152–156.
6.
EdwardsA.FitzpatrickL. A.AugustineS.TrzebuckiA.ChengS. L.PresseauC.. . . KachnowskiS. (2009). Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78, 629–637.
7.
Eibl-EibesfeldtI. U. (2007). Human ethology. Aldine Transaction.
8.
GawandeA. A.ZinnerM. J.StuddertD. M.BrennanT. A. (2003). Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery, 133, 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.169
9.
GoldbergJ. (2006). Brief laboratory report: Surgical drape flammability. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Journal, 74, 352–354.
10.
GoodwinM. A.StangeK. C.ZyzanskiS. J.CrabtreeB. F.BorawskiE. A.FlockeS. A. (2017). The Hawthorne effect in direct observation research with physicians and patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23, 1322–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12781
11.
HullL.AroraS.AggarwalR.DarziA.VincentC.SevdalisN. (2012). The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: A systematic review. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 214, 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.016
12.
JonesL.JenningsB.M.GoelzRHaythornK.ZivotJ.de WaalF.B. (2016) An ethogram to quantify operating room behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(4), 487–96.
13.
JonesL.JenningsB.M.HigginsM.De WaalF.B. (2018). Ethological observations of social behavior in the operating room. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(29), 7575–7580.
14.
JosephA.BayramzadehS.ZamaniZ.RostenbergB. (2018). Safety, performance, and satisfaction outcomes in the operating room: A literature review. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 11(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717705107
15.
KopelmanY.LanzafameR. J.KopelmanD. (2013). Trends in evolving technologies in the operating room of the future. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422522196
16.
LeeM. J. (2017). On patient safety: Being a jerk in the operating room is bad for the patient. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 475, 328–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5173-9
17.
LingardL.EspinS.RubinB.WhyteS.ColmenaresM.BakerG. R.. . . ReznickR. (2005). Getting teams to talk: Development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14, 340–346. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.012377
18.
LingardL.EspinS.WhyteS.RegehrG.BakerG. R.ReznickR.. . . GroberE. (2004). Communication failures in the operating room: An observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13, 330–334. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.5.330
19.
LingardL.ReznickR.EspinS.RegehrG.DeVitoI. (2002). Team communications in the operating room: Talk patterns, sites of tension, and implications for novices. Academic Medicine, 77, 232–237.
20.
MannC. J. (2003). Observational research methods. Research design II: Cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(1), 54–60.
21.
McCarneyR.WarnerJ.IliffeS.van HaselenR.GriffinM.FisherP. (2007). The Hawthorne effect: A randomised, controlled trial. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, Article 30. https://doi.org/1471-2288-7-30 [pii]10.1186/1471-2288-7-30
MitchellL.FlinR. (2008). Non-technical skills of the operating theatre scrub nurse: Literature review. Journal of Advances in Nursing, 63, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04695.x
24.
RiceK.ZwarensteinM.ConnL. G.KenaszchukC.RussellA.ReevesS. (2010). An intervention to improve interprofessional collaboration and communications: A comparative qualitative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24, 350–361.
25.
RogersD. A.BoehlerM. L. (2013). Surgeons managing conflict in the operating room: Defining the educational need and identifying effective behaviors. The American Journal of Surgery, 205, 125–130.
26.
RogersD. A.LingardL. (2006). Surgeons managing conflict: A framework for understanding the challenge. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 203, 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.012
27.
RuskinK.StieglerM.RosenbaumS. (2016). Quality and safety in anesthesia and perioperative care. Oxford University Press.
28.
SacksG. D.ShannonE. M.DawesA. J.RolloJ. C.NguyenD. K.RussellM. M.. . . Maggard-GibbonsM. A. (2015). Teamwork, communication and safety climate: A systematic review of interventions to improve surgical culture. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24, 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003764
29.
ScheldeT. (1994). Ethological research in psychiatry. Ethological Sociobiology, 15, 349–368.
StewartJ.BillinghurstM. (2016). A wearable navigation display can improve attentiveness to the surgical field. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 11, 1193–1200.
32.
StraussA.SchatzmanL.EhrlichD.BucherR.SabshinM. (1963). The hospital and its negotiated order. In FreidsonE. (Ed.), The hospital in modern society (pp. 147–169). The Free Press of Glencoe.
33.
SzaszP.BonrathE. M.LouridasM.FecsoA. B.HoweB.FehrA.. . . GrantcharovT. P. (2017). Setting performance standards for technical and nontechnical competence in general surgery. Annals of Surgery, 266, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001931
34.
VillafrancaA.HamlinC.EnnsS.JacobsohnE. (2017). Disruptive behaviour in the perioperative setting: A contemporary review. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 64, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0784-x
35.
WarnockF. (2003). An ethogram of neonatal distress behavior in response to acute pain (newborn male circumcision). Infant Behavior and Development, 26, 398–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(03)00038-9
36.
WatkinsN.KobeljaM.PeaveyE.ThomasS.LyonJ. (2011). An evaluation of operating room safety and efficiency: Pilot utilization of a structured focus group format and three-dimensional video mock-up to inform design decision. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5(1), 6–22.
37.
WeldonS. M.KorkiakangasT.BezemerJ.KneeboneR. (2013). Communication in the operating theatre. The British Journal of Surgery, 100, 1677–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9332
38.
ZhangJ.YuW.SuliburkJ.EberlinL. S. (2016). Will ambient ionization mass spectrometry become an integral technology in the operating room of the future?Clinical Chemistry, 62, 1172–1174. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2016.258723
39.
ZwarensteinM.ReevesS. (2002). Working together but apart: Barriers and routes to nurse-physician collaboration. Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 28, 242–247.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
