Monetary incentives can reduce the performance of pro-environmental behavior, but it remains unclear if they undermine pro-environmental intrinsic motivation. In this longitudinal intervention study, we investigated how monetarily versus environmentally framed behavioral information influences pro-environmental intrinsic motivation, intentions, and behavior. Clients of a local German energy provider (N = 657) were randomly assigned to receive electricity saving tips, combined with a savings potential in € (monetary framing) or in CO2 (environmental framing). Both types of framed tips positively influenced long-term electricity saving intentions (after 9 months), compared with a control group (receiving no tips), but not behavioral change (n = 285). Monetarily framed tips did not reduce pro-environmental intrinsic motivation (vs. a control group), but only environmentally framed tips increased pro-environmental intrinsic motivation, which mediated effects on intentions. Hence, environmental framing of behavioral interventions may be preferred when promoting long-term pro-environmental behavior without continuous monetary benefits. Otherwise, both framing strategies can be equally effective.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273-291. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
2.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 265-276. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
3.
AllcottH. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082-1095. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
4.
AsensioO. I.DelmasM. A. (2015). Nonprice incentives and energy conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1-6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1401880112
5.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6
6.
BolderdijkJ. W.LehmanP. K.GellerE. S. (2012). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour with rewards and penalties. In StegL.Van den BergA. E.De GrootJ. I. M. (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 233-242). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
7.
BolderdijkJ. W.StegL. (2015). Promoting sustainable consumption: The risks of using financial incentives. In ReischL. A.ThøgersenJ. (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 328-342). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
8.
BolderdijkJ. W.StegL.GellerE. S.LehmanP. K.PostmesT. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413-416. doi:10.1038/nclimate1767
9.
BowlesS.Polania-ReyesS. (2012). Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements?Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 368-425. doi:10.1257/jel.50.2.368
10.
BrandonG.LewisA. (1999). Reducing household energy consumption: A qualitative and quantitative field study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 75-85. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0105
CameronJ.BankoK. M.PierceW. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1-44.
14.
CameronJ.PierceW. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363-423. doi:10.3102/00346543064003363
15.
CornelissenG.PandelaereM.WarlopL.DewitteS. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 46-55. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999a). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.6.627
18.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999b). The undermining effect is a reality after all—Extrinsic rewards, task interest, and self-determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce, and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong, and Gingras (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 1256, 692-700. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.692
19.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
20.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
21.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M.KoestnerR. (2001). The pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: Response to Cameron (2001). Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 43-51. doi:10.3102/00346543071001043
22.
DelmasM. A.FischleinM.AsensioO. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729-739. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109
23.
DoganE.BolderdijkJ. W.StegL. (2014). Making small numbers count: Environmental and financial feedback in promoting eco-driving behaviours. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 413-422. doi:10.1007/s10603-014-9259-z
24.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
FreyB. S. (1992). Pricing and regulating affect environmental ethics. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 399-414. doi:10.1007/BF00304969
27.
FreyB. S.StutzerA. (2008). Environmental morale and motivation. In LewisA. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of psychology and economic behaviour (pp. 406-428). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GeiserC. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
GellerE. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing proenvironmental behavior. In BechtelR.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 525-540). New York, NY: Wiley.
30.
Gómez-BaggethunE.Ruiz-PérezM. (2011). Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35, 613-628. doi:10.1177/0309133311421708
31.
Green-DemersI.PelletierL. G.MénardS. (1997). The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 29, 157-166. doi:10.1037/0008-400X.29.3.157
32.
GrometD. M.KunreutherH.LarrickR. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 9314-9319. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110
33.
HolmS. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70. doi:10.2307/4615733.
34.
HowellR. A. (2014). Investigating the long-term impacts of climate change communications on individuals’ attitudes and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 70-101. doi:10.1177/0013916512452428
35.
HuL. t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
36.
JacksonD. L. (2010). Reporting results of latent growth modeling and multilevel modeling analyses: Some recommendations for rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 55, 272. doi:10.1037/a0020462
37.
KosoyN.CorberaE. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics, 69, 1228-1236. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
38.
LanziniP.ThøgersenJ. (2014). Behavioural spillover in the environmental domain: An intervention study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 381-390. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.006
39.
LavergneK. J.SharpE. C.PelletierL. G.HoltbyA. (2010). The role of perceived government style in the facilitation of self-determined and non self-determined motivation for pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 169-177. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.002
40.
LehmanP. K.GellerE. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(1), 13-32. doi:10.5210/bsi.v13i1.33
41.
LevinI. P.SchneiderS. L.GaethG. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
42.
MollerA. C.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2006). Self-determination theory and public policy: Improving the quality of consumer decisions without using coercion. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25, 104-116. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.1.104
43.
MuradianR.ArselM.PellegriniL.AdamanF.AguilarB.AgarwalB.. . .FrogerG. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters, 6, 274-279. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
44.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2013). Mplus 7.11 [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
45.
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913-923. doi:10.1177/0146167208316691
46.
OsbaldistonR.SchottJ. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257-299. doi:10.1177/0013916511402673
47.
OsbaldistonR.SheldonK. M. (2003). Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 349-357. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00035-5
48.
PelletierL. G.SharpE. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology, 49, 210-217. doi:10.1037/a0012755
49.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.Green-DemersI.NoelsK.BeatonA. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437-468. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
50.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
51.
RaykovT. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 223-232. doi:10.1177/0748175609344096
52.
ReipsU.-D. (2000). The web experiment method: Advantages, disadvantages, and solutions. In BirnbaumM. H. (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 89-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53.
RodeJ.Gómez-BaggethunE.KrauseT. (2015). Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 117, 270-282. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.019
54.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
55.
SchultzP. W.EstradaM.SchmittJ.SokoloskiR.Silva-SendN. (2015). Using in-home displays to provide smart meter feedback about household electricity consumption: A randomized control trial comparing kilowatts, cost, and social norms. Energy, 90, 351-358. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.130
56.
SchwartzD.Bruine de BruinW.FischhoffB.LaveL. (2015). Advertising energy saving programs: The potential environmental cost of emphasizing monetary savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 158-166. doi:10.1037/xap0000042
57.
SéguinC.PelletierL. G.HunsleyJ. (1998). Toward a model of environmental activism. Environment and Behavior, 30, 628-652. doi:10.1177/001391659803000503
58.
SpenceA.LeygueC.BedwellB.O’MalleyC. (2014). Engaging with energy reduction: Does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behaviour?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 17-28. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.006
59.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
60.
SteinhorstJ.KlöcknerC. A.MatthiesE. (2015). Saving electricity—For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 125-135. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012
61.
SteinhorstJ.MatthiesE. (2016). Monetary or environmental appeals for saving electricity?–Potentials for spillover on low carbon policy acceptability. Energy Policy, 93, 335-344. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.020
62.
TenbrunselA. E.MessickD. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684-707. doi:10.2307/2667052
63.
ThøgersenJ. (1996). Recycling and morality a critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior, 28, 536-558. doi:10.1177/0013916596284006
64.
ThøgersenJ. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2
65.
Umweltbundesamt (UBA) [German Federal Environment Agency]. (2012). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2012: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage [Environmental consciousness in Germany 2012: Results of a national representative survey]. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/4396.pdf
66.
van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1258-1265. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018
67.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.LensW.SheldonK. M.DeciE. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
68.
VatnA. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69, 1245-1252. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
69.
WebbD.SoutarG. N.MazzarolT.SaldarisP. (2013). Self-determination theory and consumer behavioural change: Evidence from a household energy-saving behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59-66. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.003
70.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206. doi:10.1086/651257
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
