Fostering nature connection may promote psychological well-being and enhance proenvironmental attitudes. However, there is limited understanding of what factors influence a person’s nature connection. Using survey responses from 1,000 residents of a large Australian city, we describe the relationship between nature connection and nature experiences at different stages in life, that is, past nature experiences that occurred during childhood, and current, everyday nature experiences. Both past childhood nature experiences and duration of current nature experiences significantly predicted nature connection. The positive relationship between duration of current nature experiences and nature connection was not significantly moderated by past childhood nature experiences. Hence, current nature experiences are associated with high levels of nature connection, even among those lacking childhood nature experiences. This research empirically demonstrates the positive relationship between nature connection and nature experiences, and suggests that it may be equally important to promote nature experiences at any life stage if increasing nature connection is the goal.
AlbrechtG.SartoreG. M.ConnorL.HigginbothamN.FreemanS.KellyB.. . . PollardG. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(Suppl. 1), S95-S98. doi:10.1080/10398560701701288
2.
BakolisI.HammoudR.SmytheM.GibbonsJ.DavidsonN.TogninS.MechelliA. (2018). Urban mind: Using smartphone technologies to investigate the impact of nature on mental well-being in real time. BioScience, 68, 134-145. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix149
3.
BellS. L.FoleyR.HoughtonF.MaddrellA.WilliamsA. M. (2018). From therapeutic landscapes to healthy spaces, places and practices: A scoping review. Social Science & Medicine, 196, 123-130. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.035
4.
BellS. L.WestleyM.LovellR.WheelerB. W. (2018). Everyday green space and experienced well-being: The significance of wildlife encounters. Landscape Research, 43, 8-19. doi:10.1080/01426397.2016.1267721
5.
BellS. L.WheelerB. W.PhoenixC. (2017). Using geonarratives to explore the diverse temporalities of therapeutic landscapes: Perspectives from “green” and “blue” settings. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 93-108. doi:10.1080/24694452.2016.1218269
6.
BoydF.WhiteM. P.BellS. L.BurtJ. (2018). Who doesn’t visit natural environments for recreation and why: A population representative analysis of spatial, individual and temporal factors among adults in England. Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, 102-113. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.016
7.
BraggR.WoodC.BartonJ.PrettyJ. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8-12: A robust methodology for the RSPB. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.
8.
BraunT.DierkesP. (2017). Connecting students to nature—How intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23, 937-949. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866
9.
BruniC. M.SchultzW. P. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 95-102. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.004
10.
CapaldiC. A.PassmoreH.-A.NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.DopkoR. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(4), 1-16. doi:10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449
11.
ChawlaL. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21. doi:10.1080/00958969809599114
12.
ChawlaL. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15-26. doi:10.1080/00958969909598628
13.
ChawlaL. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 6-23.
14.
ChawlaL.DerrV. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In ClaytonS. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 527-555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0028
15.
ChengJ. C.-H.MonroeM. C. (2012). Connection to nature children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31-49. doi:10.1177/0013916510385082
16.
ClearyA.FieldingK. S.BellS. L.MurrayZ.RoikoA. (2017). Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between eudaimonic wellbeing and nature connection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 119-128. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003
17.
ColléonyA.PrévotA.-C.Saint JalmeM.ClaytonS. (2017). What kind of landscape management can counteract the extinction of experience?Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, 23-31. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.010
18.
de OliveiraE. S.AspinallP.BriggsA.CumminsS.LeylandA. H.MitchellR.. . . ThompsonC. W. (2013). How effective is the Forestry Commission Scotland’s woodland improvement programme—“Woods In and Around Towns” (WIAT)—At improving psychological well-being in deprived urban communities? A quasi-experimental study. BMJ Open, 3(8), e003648. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003648
19.
DunnR. R.GavinM. C.SanchezM. C.SolomonJ. N. (2006). The pigeon paradox: Dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conservation Biology, 20, 1814-1816. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00533.x
20.
DutcherD. D.FinleyJ. C.LuloffA.JohnsonJ. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474-493. doi:10.1177/0013916506298794
21.
ErnstJ.TheimerS. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17, 577-598. doi:10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
22.
EvansG. W.OttoS.KaiserF. G. (2018). Childhood origins of young adult environmental behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 679-687. doi:10.1177/0956797617741894
23.
FarahaniL. M.MallerC.PhelanK. (2018). Private gardens as urban greenspaces: Can they compensate for poor greenspace access in lower socioeconomic neighbourhoods?Landscape Online, 59, 1-18. doi:10.3097/LO.201859
24.
FrumkinH.BratmanG. N.BreslowS. J.CochranB.KahnP. H.Jr.LawlerJ. J.. . . WolfK. L. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), 075001. doi:10.1289/EHP1663
25.
GardenJ. G.McAlpineC. A.PossinghamH. P. (2010). Multi-scaled habitat considerations for conserving urban biodiversity: Native reptiles and small mammals in Brisbane, Australia. Landscape Ecology, 25, 1013-1028. doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9476-z
26.
GasconM.ZijlemaW.VertC.WhiteM. P.NieuwenhuijsenM. (2017). Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: A systematic review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220, 1207-1221. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.08.004
27.
GeslerW. M. (1992). Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Social Science & Medicine, 34, 735-746. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90360-3
28.
GeslerW. M. (1993). Therapeutic landscapes: Theory and a case study of Epidauros, Greece. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 171-189. doi:10.1068/d110171
29.
GuineyM. S.OberhauserK. S. (2009). Conservation volunteers’ connection to nature. Ecopsychology, 1, 187-197. doi:10.1089/eco.2009.0030
30.
GuitartD.PickeringC.ByrneJ. (2012). Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11, 364-373. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
31.
HartigT.MitchellR.De VriesS.FrumkinH. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
32.
HindsJ. (2018). Forest school: Wellbeing & nature connection. Paper presented at the International Association of People-Environment Studies, Rome, Italy, July.
33.
HM Government. (2018). A green future: Our 25 year plan to improve the environment. London, England: HM Government.
34.
HowellA. J.DopkoR. L.PassmoreH. A.BuroK. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166-171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
35.
IvesC. D.GiustiM.FischerJ.AbsonD. J.KlanieckiK.DorningerC.. . . Martín-LópezB. (2017). Human–nature connection: A multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 106-113. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.005
36.
KalsE.SchumacherD.MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056
37.
KamitsisI.FrancisA. J. (2013). Spirituality mediates the relationship between engagement with nature and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 136-143. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.013
38.
KellertS. R. (2012). Birthright: People and nature in the modern world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
KlanieckiK.LeventonJ.AbsonD. J. (2018). Human–nature connectedness as a “treatment” for pro-environmental behavior: Making the case for spatial considerations. Sustainability Science, 13, 1375-1388. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0578-x
40.
LinB. B.FullerR. A.BushR.GastonK. J.ShanahanD. F. (2014). Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e87422. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087422
41.
LouvR. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
42.
LumberR.RichardsonM.SheffieldD. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177186
43.
MacKerronG.MouratoS. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23, 992-1000. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
44.
MarkevychI.SchoiererJ.HartigT.ChudnovskyA.HystadP.DzhambovA. M.. . . NieuwenhuijsenM. J. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301-317. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
45.
MartinC.CzellarS. (2017). Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 56-68. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.04.009
46.
MartynP.BrymerE. (2016). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 1436-1445. doi:10.1177/1359105314555169
47.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. (2004). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
48.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M.Bruehlman-SenecalE.DolliverK. (2008). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607-643. doi:10.1177/0013916508319745
49.
MorganJ. (2018). Living well with dementia. The Lancet Neurology, 17, 306-307. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30424-6
50.
MotulskyH. (2013). Intuitive biostatistics: A nonmathematical guide to statistical thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
MüllerM. M.KalsE.PansaR. (2009). Adolescents’ emotional affinity toward nature: A cross-societal study. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 59-69.
52.
NisbetE. K.GickM. L. (2008). Can health psychology help the planet? Applying theory and models of health behaviour to environmental actions. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 296-303. doi:10.1037/a0013277
53.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101-1106. doi:10.1177/0956797611418527
54.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 813. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813
55.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2008). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748
56.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303-322. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7
57.
PensiniP.HornE.CaltabianoN. J. (2016). An exploration of the relationships between adults’ childhood and current nature exposure and their mental well-being. Children, Youth and Environments, 26, 125-147. doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.26.1.0125
58.
PerkinsH. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 455-463. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004
59.
PerrinJ. L.BenassiV. A. (2009). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 434-440. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.003
60.
RestallB.ConradE. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264-278. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022
61.
RishbethC.Blachnicka CiacekD.BynonR.StapfT. (2017). #refugeeswelcome in parks: A resource book. Sheffield, UK: The University of Sheffield.
62.
RoeJ.AspinallP. A.Ward ThompsonC. (2016). Understanding relationships between health, ethnicity, place and the role of urban green space in deprived urban communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13, Article 681. doi:10.3390/ijerph13070681
63.
RussellR.GuerryA. D.BalvaneraP.GouldR. K.BasurtoX.ChanK. M.. . . TamJ. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473-502. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012312-110838
64.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2016). Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49, 359-389. doi:10.1177/0013916516637648
65.
SchultzW. P. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327-339. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
66.
SchultzW. P.TabanicoJ. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1219-1247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x
67.
ScopellitiM.CarrusG.AdinolfiC.SuarezG.ColangeloG.LafortezzaR.. . . SanesiG. (2016). Staying in touch with nature and well-being in different income groups: The experience of urban parks in Bogotá. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 139-148. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.002
68.
ShanahanD.BushR.GastonK.LinB.DeanJ.BarberE.FullerR. (2016). Health benefits from nature experiences depend on dose. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 28551. doi:10.1038/srep28551
69.
SkårM. (2010). Forest dear and forest fear: Dwellers’ relationships to their neighbourhood forest. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98, 110-116. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.017
70.
SogaM.GastonK. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 94-101. doi:10.1002/fee.1225
71.
TamK.-P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64-78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
72.
TannerT. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20-24. doi:10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386
73.
ThrelfallC. G.KendalD. (2018). The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 348-356. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.012
74.
TrigwellJ. L.FrancisA. J.BagotK. L. (2014). Nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: Spirituality as a potential mediator. Ecopsychology, 6, 241-251. doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0025
75.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, highlights. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations.
76.
Victoria State Government. (2017). Protecting Victoria’s Environment—Biodiversity 2037. Melbourne, VA: Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning.
77.
WeinsteinN.BalmfordA.DeHaanC. R.GladwellV.BradburyR. B.AmanoT. (2015). Seeing community for the trees: The links among contact with natural environments, community cohesion, and crime. Bioscience, 65, 1141-1153. doi:10.1093/biosci/biv151
78.
WellsN. M.LekiesK. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1-24.
79.
WellsN. M.LekiesK. S. (2017). Children and nature: Following the trail to environmental attitudes and behavior. In DickinsonJ. L.BonneyR. E. (Eds.), Citizen science (pp. 201-213). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/9780801463952-021
80.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81.
WindhorstE.WilliamsA. (2015). Growing up, naturally: The mental health legacy of early nature affiliation. Ecopsychology, 7, 115-125. doi:10.1089/eco.2015.0040
82.
WolskoC.LindbergK. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5, 80-91. doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0008
83.
WylesK. J.WhiteM. P.HattamC.PahlS.KingH.AustenM. (2017). Are some natural environments more psychologically beneficial than others? The importance of type and quality on connectedness to nature and psychological restoration. Environment and Behavior. doi:10.1177/0013916517738312
84.
ZelenskiJ. M.DopkoR. L.CapaldiC. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24-31. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
