Social norms have been successfully applied in health promotion and environmental conservation, but their potential for encouraging natural hazard preparation is relatively untested. This research extends the focus theory of normative conduct to natural hazards and cognitive-behavioral outcomes by examining whether focusing individuals on descriptive and injunctive norms increases their support for earthquake-strengthening legislation in a seismically active city: Wellington, New Zealand. In a large community sample (N = 690), the injunctive norm condition increased support for the legislation compared with the control, whereas the descriptive norm condition did not. In contrast, the descriptive norm condition raised judgments of the feasibility of the strengthening work compared with the control, whereas the injunctive norm condition did not. These findings support previous research demonstrating the differing effects of descriptive and injunctive forms of normative information, and suggest that using both in the same communication is the best strategy for enhancing support for earthquake-strengthening legislation.
ArlikattiS.LindellM. K.PraterC. S. (2007). Perceived stake-holder role relationships and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 25, 218-256.
4.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta- analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939
5.
BallantyneM.PatonD.JohnstonD.KozuchM.DalyM. (2000). Information on volcanic and earthquake hazards: The impact on awareness and preparation. Lower Hutt, New Zealand: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences.
6.
BeckerJ.PatonD.JohnstonD.RonanK. (2014). Societal influences on earthquake information meaning-making and household preparedness. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 32, 317-352.
7.
BorsariB.CareyK. B. (2003). Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 331-341.
8.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105-109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
9.
CialdiniR. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72, 263-268. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6
10.
CialdiniR. B. (2012). The focus theory of normative conduct. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 295-312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CialdiniR. B.DemaineL. J.SagarinB. J.BarrettD. W.RhoadsK.WinterP. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1, 3-15. doi:10.1080/15534510500181459
12.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
13.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
14.
CrawfordL. A.NovakK. B. (2010). Beliefs about alcohol and the college experience as moderators of the effects of perceived drinking norms on student alcohol use. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 54(3), 69-86.
15.
DemarqueC.CharalambidesL.HiltonD. J.WaroquierL. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166-174. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008
16.
EiserR. J.BostromA.BurtonI.JohnstonD. M.McClureJ.PatonD.. . . WhiteM. P. (2012). Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 1, 5-16. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002
17.
EjetaL. T.ArdalanA.PatonD. (2015). Application of behavioral theories to disaster and emergency health preparedness: A systematic review. PLoS Currents Disasters, 7. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829
18.
EvansL.MilfontT. L.LawrenceJ. (2014). Considering local adaptation increases willingness to mitigate. Global Environmental Change, 25, 69-75. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.013
19.
FlynnJ.SlovicP.MertzC. K.CarlisleC. (1999). Public support for earthquake risk mitigation in Portland, Oregon. Risk Analysis, 19, 205-216. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00400.x
GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV.CialdiniR. B. (2007). Invoking social norms: A social psychology perspective on improving hotels’ linen-re-use programs. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 48, 145-150. doi:10.1177/0010880407299542
22.
HamannK. R. S.ReeseG.SeewaldD.LoeschingerD. C. (2015). Affixing the theory of normative conduct (to your mailbox): Injunctive and descriptive norms as predictors of anti-ads sticker use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.08.003
23.
JacobsonR. P.MortensenC. R.JacobsonK. J. L.CialdiniR. B. (2015). Self-control moderates the effectiveness of influence attempts highlighting injunctive social norms. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 718-726. doi:10.1177/1948550615578463
24.
JoffeH.RossettoT.AdamsJ. (Eds.). (2013). Cities at risk: Living with perils in the 21st century. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
25.
JonasE.FritscheI. (2012). Follow the norm! Terror management theory and the influence of descriptive norms. Social Psychology, 43, 28-32. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000077
26.
KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012. doi:10.1177/01461672002610009
27.
KhanS.CrozierM. J.KennedyD. (2012). Influences of place characteristics on hazards, perception and response: A case study of the hazardscape of the Wellington Region, New Zealand. Natural Hazards, 62, 501-529. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0091-y
28.
KormosC.GiffordR.BrownE. (2015). The influence of descriptive social norm information on sustainable transport behavior: A field experiment. Environment and Behavior, 47, 479-501. doi:10.1177/0013916513520416
29.
LindellM. K.ArlikattiS.PraterC. S. (2009). Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: Perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes. Risk Analysis, 29, 1072-1088. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x
30.
ManningM. (2009). The effects of subjective norms on behaviour in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 649-705. doi:10.1348/014466608X393136
31.
MashekD.CannadayL. W.TangneyJ. P. (2007). Inclusion of Community in Self Scale: A single-item pictorial measure of community connectedness. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 257-275. doi:10.1002/jcop.20146
32.
McClureJ.JohnstonD.HenrichL.MilfontT. L.BeckerJ. (2015). When a hazard occurs where it is not expected: Risk judgments about different regions after the Christchurch earthquakes. Natural Hazards, 75, 635-652. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6
33.
McClureJ.SpittalM. J.FischerR.CharlesonA. (2015). Why do people take fewer damage mitigation actions than survival actions? Other factors outweigh cost. Natural Hazards Review, 16(2), 1-8. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000152
34.
McIvorD.PatonD. (2007). Preparing for natural hazards: Normative and attitudinal influences. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16, 79-88. doi:10.1108/09653560710729839
35.
NeighborsC.JensenM.TidwellJ.WalterT.FossosN.LewisM. A. (2011). Social norms interventions for light and nondrinking students. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 651-669. doi:10.1177/1368430210398014
36.
NeighborsC.LaBrieJ. W.HummerJ. F.LewisM. A.LeeC. M.DesaiS.. . . LarimerM. E. (2010). Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 522-528. doi:10.1037/a0019944
37.
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913-923. doi:10.1177/0146167208316691
38.
ParkH. S.KleinK. A.SmithS.MartellD. (2009). Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and U.S. descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behaviour intentions. Health Communication, 24, 746-751. doi:10.1080/10410230903265912
39.
ParkH. S.SmithS. W. (2007). Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioural intent: A case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Human Communication Research, 33, 194-218. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x
40.
PatonD.JohnstonD. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerabilities, resilience, and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10, 270-277. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005930
41.
RussellL. A.GoltzJ.BourqueL. B. (1995). Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environment and Behavior, 27, 744-770. doi:10.1177/0013916595276002
42.
SanquiniA. M.ThapaliyaS. M.WoodM. M. (2016). A communications intervention to motivate disaster risk reduction. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25, 245-259. doi:10.1108/DPM-11-2015-0256
43.
SanquiniA. M.ThapaliyaS. M.WoodM. M.BaiocchiM.HilleyG. E. (2016). Encouraging earthquake-resistant construction: A randomized controlled trial in Nepal. Earthquake Spectra, 32, 1975-1988. doi:10.1193/102015EQS156M
44.
SchultzP. W.KhazianA.ZaleskiA. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3, 4-23. doi:10.1080/15534510701755614
45.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
SolbergC.RossettoT.JoffeH. (2010). The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: Re-evaluating the international literature. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 1663-1677. doi:10.5194/nhess-10-1663-2010
48.
SpittalM. J.McClureJ.SiegertR. J.WalkeyF. H. (2008). Predictors of two types of earthquake preparation: Survival activities and mitigation activities. Environment and Behavior, 40, 798-817. doi:10.1177/0013916507309864
49.
TarhiniA.HoneK.LiuX. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of age and gender on e-learning acceptance in England: A structural equation modelling approach for an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51, 163-184. doi:10.2190/EC.51.2.b
50.
TerpstraT.LindellM. K. (2013). Citizens’ perceptions of flood hazard adjustments: An application of the protective action decision model. Environment and Behavior, 45, 993-1018. doi:10.1177/0013916512452427
51.
TerrierL.MarfaingB. (2015). Using social norms and commitment to promote pro environmental behavior among hotel guests. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 10-15. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.001
52.
UpretyP.PoudelA. (2012). Earthquake risk perception among citizens in Kathmandu, Nepal. Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 1, 3-9. Available from http://trauma.massey.ac.nz/
53.
VinnellL. J. (2016). Examining the effects of message framing and social norms on judgments of earthquake legislation (Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand). Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/handle/10063/5471
54.
VinnellL. J.McClureJ.MilfontT. L. (2017). Do framing messages increase support for earthquake legislation?Disaster Prevention and Management, 26, 28-40. doi:10.1108/DPM-06-2016-0127
55.
WalkerG. J.CourneyaK. S.DengJ. (2006). Ethnicity, gender, and the theory of planned behavior: The case of playing the lottery. Journal of Leisure Research, 38, 224-248.
56.
WangY.WuM.WangH. (2009). Investigating the determinants of age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92-118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
WoodM. M.MiletiD. S.KanoM.KelleyM. M.ReganR.BourqueL. B. (2012). Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards. Risk Analysis, 32, 601-615. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01645.x
