The positive relation of biospheric and altruistic values as well as the negative relation of egoistic and hedonic values to environmentally responsible behavior, are established findings in environmental psychological research. Recent findings revealed that compassion, the sensitivity to the suffering of other individuals, is also relevant for proenvironmental intentions. We tested the role of compassion in combination with universal altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, and hedonic values concerning an environmentally responsible behavior with an explicit social and hedonic component: sustainable fashion consumption. In a large survey study (n = 981), we found that compassion was positively linked to sustainable purchase criteria. The manipulation of compassion in an online study (n = 197) resulted in a small, positive effect on the willingness to pay extra for fair trade clothes. Moreover, we found that hedonic values showed a consistent negative relation to sustainable fashion consumption in both studies, thus corroborating former research on the critical relevance of hedonic values in the context of proenvironmental behavior.
BabinB.DardenW.GriffinM. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644-656. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489765
2.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
3.
BatsonC. D.ShawL. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107-122. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
4.
BerenguerJ. (2007). The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 269-283. doi:10.1177/0013916506292937
5.
BMZ-German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (2014, August). Zum Thema: Nachhaltige Textilien - was tut die deutsche Entwicklungspolitik [Regarding: Sustainable textiles—What does German development policy do] [Brochure]. Retrieved from https://www.textilbuendnis.com/images/pdf/Materialie247_textilbuendnis_zumThema.pdf
6.
ButlerS. M.FrancisS. (1997). The effects of environmental attitudes on apparel purchasing behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15, 76-85. doi:10.1177/0887302X9701500202
7.
de GrootJ. I. M.StegL. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 318-332. doi:10.1177/0022022107300278
8.
de GrootJ. I. MStegL. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330-354. doi:10.1177/0013916506297831
9.
de GrootJ. I. M.StegL.DickeM. (2008). Transportation trends from a moral perspective: Value orientations, norms, and reducing car use. In GustavssonF. N. (Ed.), New transportation research progress (pp. 76-91). New York, NY: Nova Science.
10.
DicksonM. A. (2000). Personal values, beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes relating to intentions to purchase apparel from socially responsible businesses. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18, 19-30. doi:10.1177/0887302X0001800103
11.
DovidioJ. F.AllenJ. L.SchroederD. A. (1990). Specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 249-260. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.249
12.
FiedlerK. (2014). From intrapsychic to ecological theories in social psychology: Outlines of a functional theory approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 657-670. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2069
GeigerS. M.FischerD.SchraderU. (2017). Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: An integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/sd.1688
15.
GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD.Simon-ThomasE. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351-374. doi:10.1037/a0018807
16.
GoodmanE.AdlerN. E.KawachiI.FrazierA. L.HuangB.ColditzG. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108, E31.
17.
HaidtJ. (2003). The moral emotions. In GoldsmithH. H.SchererK. R.DavidsonR. J. (Eds.), Series in affective science. Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
HirschmanE. C.HolbrookM. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 92-101. doi:10.2307/1251707
19.
JakovcevicA.StegL. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 70-79. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.005
20.
Joo ParkE.Young KimE.Cardona ForneyJ. (2006). A structural model of fashion-oriented impulse buying behavior. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10, 433-446. doi:10.1108/13612020610701965
21.
KangJ.LiuC.KimS.-H. (2013). Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 442-452. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12013
22.
KarpD. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133. doi:10.1177/0013916596281006
23.
KellerJ.PfattheicherS. (2013). The compassion-hostility paradox: The interplay of vigilant, prevention-focused self-regulation, compassion, and hostility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1518-1529. doi:10.1177/0146167213499024
24.
KlöcknerC. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028-1038. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014
25.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
LeachM. A.RaworthK.RockströmJ. (2013). Between social and planetary boundaries: Navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity In International Social Science Council ISSC & United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (Eds.), World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments (pp. 84-89). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
27.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405-416. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
28.
MehrabianA.EpsteinN. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
29.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2010). Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
PaulinsV. A.HilleryJ. L. (2009). Ethics in the fashion industry. New York, NY: Fairchild Books.
32.
PfattheicherS.SassenrathC.SchindlerS. (2015). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies. Environment and Behavior, 48, 929-945. doi:10.1177/0013916515574549
33.
RudellF. (2006). Shopping with a social conscience: Consumer attitudes toward sweatshop labor. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24, 282-296. doi:10.1177/0887302X06293063
34.
SchausK. (2013). Gutachten nachhaltige Kleidung: Der Weg zu nachhaltiger Kleidung: Standards, Siegel und politische Rahmenbedingungen [Report on sustainable clothing: The road to sustainable clothing: Standards, logos and political conditions]. Konstanz, Germany: It Fits. Retrieved from https://www.gruene-bundestag.de
35.
SchultzW. P.ZeleznyL. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
36.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
StegL. (2005). Car use: Lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 147-162. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
40.
StegL.de GrootJ. I. M.DreijerinkL.AbrahamseW.SieroF. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources, 24, 349-367. doi:10.1080/08941920903214116
41.
StegL.PerlaviciuteG.van der WerffE.LurvinkJ. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46, 163-192. doi:10.1177/0013916512454730
42.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
43.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6, 81-97.
44.
SternP. C.DietzT.GuagnanoG. A. (1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 984-1001. doi:10.1177/0013164498058006008
45.
TamK.-P. (2013). Dispositional empathy with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 92-104. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004
46.
ThøgersenJ.ÖlanderF. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 605-630. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00120-4
47.
Umweltbundesamt (UBA) (2014). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2014 [Environmental consciousness in Germany 2014]. Retrieved from https://www.umweltbundesamt.de
48.
WeissC.TrevenenA.WhiteT. (2014). The branding of sustainable fashion. Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 1, 231-258. doi:10.1386/fspc.1.2.231_1
49.
WiernikB. M.OnesD. S.DilchertS. (2013). Age and environmental sustainability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 826-856. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0221
