We proposed and tested a conceptual model of how cultural cognition worldviews, climate change risk perception, and psychological barriers are related to reported energy conservation behavior frequency. Egalitarian and communitarian worldviews were correlated with heightened climate change risk perception, and egalitarian worldviews were correlated with weaker perceived barriers to reported energy conservation behavior. Heightened climate change risk perception was, in turn, associated with fewer perceived barriers to engagement in energy conservation behavior and more reported energy conservation behaviors. The relation between cultural worldviews and perceived barriers was partly mediated by climate change risk perception. Individuals with distinct worldviews perceived psychological barriers differently, and some barrier components were more strongly related to energy conservation behavior than others. Overall, climate change risk perception was the strongest predictor of perceived barriers and of energy conservation behavior frequency. Future efforts should focus on reducing the psychological barriers to energy conservation behavior identified in this study.
ArcuryT. A.ChristiansonE. H. (1990). Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems Kentucky 1984 and 1988 compared. Environment and Behavior, 22, 387-407. doi:10.1177/0013916590223004
2.
BlakeJ. (1999). Overcoming the “value-action gap” in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4, 257-278. doi:10.1080/13549839908725599
3.
BoholmÅ. (1996). Risk perception and social anthropology: Critique of cultural theory. Ethnos, 61, 64-84. doi:10.1080/00141844.1996.9981528
4.
BrodyS.GroverH.VedlitzA. (2012). Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behaviour to mitigate climate change. Climate Policy, 12, 1-22. doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.579261
5.
ChenA.GiffordR. (2015). “I wanted to cooperate, but . . .”: Justifying suboptimal cooperation in a commons dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 47, 282-291. doi:10.1037/cbs0000021
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
7.
DakeK. (1991). Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, 61-82. doi:10.1177/0022022191221006
8.
DakeK. (1992). Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 21-37.
DietzT.GardnerG. T.GilliganJ.SternP. C.VandenberghM. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18452-18456. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908738106
11.
DietzT.SternP. C.GuagnanoG. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471. doi:10.1177/001391659803000402
12.
DouglasM. (1970). Natural symbols: Explorations in cosmology. London, England: Barrie & Rockliff, The Cresset Press.
13.
DouglasM. (1982). Introduction to grid/group analysis. In DouglasM. (Ed.), Essays in the sociology of perception (pp. 1-8). London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
FelonneauM.-L.BeckerM. (2008). Pro-environmental attitudes and behavior: Revealing perceived social desirability. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 25-53.
16.
FeyginaI.JostJ. T.GoldsmithR. E. (2009). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326-338. doi:10.1177/0146167209351435
17.
FieldA. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
18.
FremlingG. M.LottJ. R. (2003). The surprising finding that “cultural worldviews” don’t explain people’s views on gun control. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1342-1348.
19.
GiffordR. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290-302. doi:10.1037/a0023566
20.
GiffordR.HayR.BorosK. (1982). Individual differences in environmental attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 19-23. doi:10.1080/00958964.1983.10801933
21.
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 141-157. doi:10.1002/ijop.12034
22.
GiffordR.ScannellL.KormosC.SmolovaL.BielA.BoncuS.. . . UzzellD. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
23.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviours in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 414-421. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.002
24.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 292-302. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.001
25.
HawthorneG.ElliottP. (2005). Imputing cross-sectional missing data: Comparison of common techniques. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 583-590.
HunterL. M.HatchA.JohnsonA. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 677-694.
28.
IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In: FieldC. B.BarrosV. R.DokkenD. J.MachK. J.MastrandreaM. D.MastrandreraP. R.WhiteL.L. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessement Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1-31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdf
29.
JonesM. D. (2011). Leading the way to compromise? Cultural theory and climate change opinion. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44, 720-725. doi:10.1017/S104909651100134X
30.
KahanD. M. (2012). Cultural cognition as a conception of the cultural theory of risk. In RoeserS.HillerbrandR.SandinP.PetersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory: Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk (pp. 725-759). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1123807
31.
KahanD. M.BramanD. (2003). More statistics, less persuasion: A cultural theory of gun-risk perceptions. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1291-1327. doi:10.2307/3312930
32.
KahanD. M.BramanD. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 24, 149-172.
33.
KahanD. M.BramanD.GastilJ.SlovicP.MertzC. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 465-505. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x
34.
KahanD. M.BramanD.SlovicP.GastilJ.CohenG. (2007). The second national risk and culture study: Making sense of—and making progress in—the American culture war of fact. The Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1017189
35.
KahanD. M.Jenkins-SmithH.BramanD. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147-174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
36.
KahanD. M.Jenkins-SmithH.TarantolaT.SilvaC. L.BramanD. (2015). Geoengineering and climate change polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 192-222. doi:10.1177/0002716214559002
37.
KahanD. M.PetersE.WittlinM.SlovicP.OuelletteL. L.BramanD.. . . MandelG. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547
38.
KaiserF. G.KellerC. (2001). Disclosing situational constraints to ecological behavior: A confirmatory application of the mixed Rasch model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 212-221. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.212
39.
KaiserH. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151. doi:10.1177/001316446002000116
40.
KlöcknerC. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1028-1038. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014
41.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
42.
KormosC.GiffordR.CrawfordC. (2012, June). Psychological influences on public acceptance of the Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). Poster presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Poster Retrieved from http://pics.uvic.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/kormos_poster.pdf
43.
LeiserowitzA. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?Risk Analysis, 25, 1433-1442. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x
44.
LeiserowitzA. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45-72. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
45.
LimaM. L.CastroP. (2005). Cultural theory meets the community: Worldviews and local issues. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 23-35. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.004
46.
LorenzoniI.Nicholson-ColeS.WhitmarshL. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445-459. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
47.
LorenzoniI.PidgeonN. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77, 73-95. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
48.
MalkaA.KrosnickJ. A.LangerG. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis, 29, 633-647. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x
49.
MarrisC.LangfordI. H.O’RiordanT. (1998). A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis, 18, 635-647. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00376.x
50.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E.XiaoC. (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change, 119, 511-518. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0704-9
51.
MirosaM.LawsonR.GnothD. (2011). Linking personal values to energy-efficient behaviors in the home. Environment and Behavior, 45, 455-475. doi:10.1177/0013916511432332
52.
NordM.LuloffA. E.BridgerJ. C. (1998). The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environment and Behavior, 30, 235-246. doi:10.1177/0013916598302006
53.
O’ConnorR. E.BordR. J.YarnalB.WiefekN. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1-17. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00067
54.
OverdevestC.ChristiansenL. (2013). Using “cultural cognition” to predict environmental risk perceptions in a Florida water-supply planning process. Society & Natural Resources, 26, 987-1007. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.724152
55.
PatchenM. (2010). What shapes public reactions to climate change? Overview of research and policy implications. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10, 47-68. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01201.x
56.
PoortingaW.StegL.VlekC. (2002). Environmental risk concern and preferences for energy-saving measures. Environment and Behavior, 34, 455-478. doi:10.1177/00116502034004003
57.
PriceJ. C.WalkerI. A.BoschettiF. (2014). Measuring cultural values and beliefs about environment to identify their role in climate change responses. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 8-20. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.10.001
58.
RipplS. (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: A proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 5, 147-165. doi:10.1080/13669870110042598
59.
SafiA. S.SmithW. J.LiuZ. (2012). Rural Nevada and climate change: Vulnerability, beliefs, and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 32, 1041-1059. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01836.x
60.
SardianouE. (2007). Estimating energy conservation patterns of Greek households. Energy Policy, 35, 3778-3791. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.020
61.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2011). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45, 60-85. doi:10.1177/0013916511421196
62.
ShiJ.VisschersV. H. M.SiegristM. (2015). Public perception of climate change: The importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Analysis, 35, 2183-2201. doi:10.1111/risa.12406
63.
StegL.SieversI. (2000). Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 32, 250-269. doi:10.1177/00139160021972513
64.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-98.
65.
StevensJ. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
Stoll-KleemannS.O’RiordanT.JaegerC. C. (2001). The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: Evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environmental Change, 11, 107-117. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00061-3
67.
SundbladE.-L.BielA.GärlingT. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgements related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 97-106. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.003
68.
Takacs-SantaA. (2007). Barriers to environmental concern. Research in Human Ecology, 14, 26-38.
69.
ThompsonM.EllisR.WildavskyA. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
70.
TikirA.LehmannB. (2011). Climate change, theory of planned behavior and values: A structural equation model with mediation analysis: A letter. Climatic Change, 104, 389-402. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9937-z
71.
van der LindenS. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112-124. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012
72.
van der LindenS. (2016a). A conceptual critique of the cultural cognition thesis. Science Communication, 38, 128-138. doi:10.1177/1075547015614970
73.
van der LindenS. (2016b). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions, attitudes, and behaviours: A national study. Environmental Education Research, 22, 434-435. doi:10.1080/13504622.2015.1108391
74.
van der LindenS.LeiserowitzA. A.FeinbergG. D.MaibachE. W. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors?Climatic Change, 126, 255-262. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4
75.
van der LindenS.LeiserowitzA. A.FeinbergG. D.MaibachE. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118489. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
76.
WhitmarshL. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21, 690-700. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
77.
XiaoC.HongD. (2010). Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population and Environment, 32, 88-104. doi:10.1007/s11111-010-0115-z
78.
XueW.HineD. W.LoiN. M.ThorsteinssonE. B.PhillipsW. J. (2014). Cultural worldviews and environmental risk perceptions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 249-258. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.002
79.
XueW.HineD. W.MarksA. D. G.PhillipsW. J.ZhaoS. (2016). Cultural worldviews and climate change: A view from China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 134-144. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12116
80.
ZahranS.BrodyS. D.GroverH.VedlitzA. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society & Natural Resources, 19, 771-789. doi:10.1080/08941920600835528
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
