Do behavioral measures of ecological lifestyles reflect actual environmental impact? Three convenience samples of German adults (N = 881) completed such a measure, the General Ecological Behavior (GEB) scale. Their household electricity consumption was self-reported (Study 1), assessed by a smart-meter (Study 2), or reported by the power company (Study 3). The latter two studies controlled for income, which can boost consumption just as it opens possibilities for behaving ecologically. Within and across studies, analyses revealed a negative association between self-reported ecological behavior and electricity consumption (−.18 ≤ rs ≤ −.22), even with adjustment for income. Furthermore, customers in a green electricity program reported more ecological engagement and consumed one third less electricity than did regular customers. These results indicate the criterion validity of the GEB scale for a highly practically relevant criterion and encourage the use of generic behavior measures in efforts to understand and foster more ecological lifestyles.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273-291. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
2.
BechtelR. B. (1990). The ubiquitous world of paper and pencil tests. In BechtelR. B.MaransW. W.MichelsonW. (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 82-119). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
3.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BrattC.SternP. C.MatthiesE.NensethV. (2015). Home, car use, and vacation: The structure of environmentally significant individual behavior. Environment & Behavior, 47, 436-473. doi:10.1177/0013916514525038
5.
BrounenD.KokN.QuigleyJ. M. (2012). Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics. European Economic Review, 56, 931-945. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.02.007
6.
CharlesE. P. (2005). Correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods, 10, 206-226. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.206
7.
Commission of the European Communities. (2008). Energy efficiency: Delivering the 20% target. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
8.
CommonerB. (1972). The closing circle: Nature, man, and technology. London, England: Jonathan Cape.
9.
Corral-VerdugoV.BonnesM.Tapia-FonllemC.Fraijo-SingB.Frías-ArmentaM.CarrusG. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 34-43. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.09.001
10.
DarbyS. (2010). Smart metering: What potential for householder engagement?Building Research & Information, 38, 442-457. doi:10.1080/09613218.2010.492660
11.
DeCosterJ.IselinA.-M. R.GallucciM. (2009). A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods, 14, 349-366. doi:10.1037/a0016956
12.
De YoungR. (1986). Some psychological aspects of recycling: The structure of conservation satisfactions. Environment & Behavior, 18, 435-449. doi:10.1177/0013916586184001
13.
DiekmannA.FranzenA. (1999). The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environment & Behavior, 31, 540-549. doi:10.1177/00139169921972227
14.
DunlapR. E.YorkR. (2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 529-563. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00127.x
15.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16.
EhrlichP. R.HoldrenJ. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212-1217. doi:10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
17.
EvansG. W.BrauchleG.HaqA.SteckerR.WongK.ShapiroE. (2007). Young children’s environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment & Behavior, 39, 635-658. doi:10.1177/0013916506294252
18.
FairbrotherM. (2012). Rich people, poor people, and environmental concern: Evidence across nations and time. European Sociological Review, 29, 910-922. doi:10.1093/esr/jcs068
19.
FergusonG. A. (1941). The factorial interpretation of test difficulty. Psychometrika, 6, 323-329. doi:10.1007/BF02288588
20.
GardnerG. T.SternP. C. (2008). The short list: The most effective actions U.S. households can take to curb climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 12-25. doi:10.3200/envt.50.5.12-25
21.
GaterslebenB. (2012). Measuring environmental behaviour. In StegL.van den BergA. E.de GrootJ. I. M. (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 132-140). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
GaterslebenB.StegL.VlekC. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment & Behavior, 34, 335-365. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004
23.
GiffordR.KormosC.McIntyreA. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: Drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 801-827. doi:10.1002/wcc.143
24.
GreveW. (2001). Traps and gaps in action explanation: Theoretical problems of a psychology of human action. Psychological Review, 108, 435-451. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.435
25.
HowardG. S. (2000). Adapting human lifestyles for the 21st century. American Psychologist, 55, 509-515. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.509
26.
InglehartR. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science & Politics, 28, 57-72. doi:10.2307/420583
27.
KaiserF. G.BrüggerA.HartigT.BognerF. X.GutscherH. (2014). Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: How stable are these attitudes and which comes first?European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 64, 269-277. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.001
28.
KaiserF. G.ByrkaK.HartigT. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351-367. doi:10.1177/1088868310366452
29.
KaiserF. G.DokaG.HofstetterP.RanneyM. A. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11-20. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0
30.
KaiserF. G.SchultzP. W.ScheuthleH. (2007). The theory of planned behavior without compatibility? Beyond method bias and past trivial associations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1522-1544. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00225.x
31.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. R. (2000). Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 952-978. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02505.x
32.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. R. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531-1544. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
33.
KaklamanouD.JonesC. R.WebbT. L.WalkerS. R. (2015). Using public transport can make up for flying abroad on holiday: Compensatory green beliefs and environmentally significant behavior. Environment & Behavior, 47, 184-204. doi:10.1177/0013916513488784
34.
KennedyH. E.KrahnH.KrogmanN. T. (2014). Egregious emitters: Disproportionality in household carbon footprints. Environment & Behavior, 46, 535-555. doi:10.1177/0013916512474986
35.
KennedyH. E.KrahnH.KrogmanN. T. (2015). Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behaviour, and carbon footprint. Local Environment, 20, 220-236. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.837039
36.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359-371. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
Leonard-BartonD. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 243-252. doi:10.1086/208861
39.
MagnaniE. (2000). The environmental Kuznets curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecological Economics, 32, 431-443. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00115-9
40.
MiddenC. J. H.KaiserF. G.McCalleyT. L. (2007). Technology’s four roles in understanding individuals’ conservation of natural resources. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 155-174. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00501.x
41.
OttoS.KaiserF. G. (2014). Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 331-338. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.08.004
42.
OttoS.KaiserF. G.ArnoldO. (2014). The critical challenge of climate change for psychology: Preventing rebound and promoting more individual irrationality. European Psychologist, 19, 96-106. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000182
43.
PampelF. C. (2014). The varied influence of SES on environmental concern. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 57-75. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12045
44.
PelletierL. G.SharpE. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 210-217. doi:10.1037/a0012755
45.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.Green-DemersI.NoelsK.BeatonA. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437-468. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
46.
RaschG. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1960).
47.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
49.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2010). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 289-297. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.010
50.
ScheuthleH.Carabias-HütterV.KaiserF. G. (2005). The motivational and instantaneous behavior effects of contexts: Steps towards a theory of goal-directed behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2076-2093. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02210.x
51.
ScottD.WillitsF. K. (1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment & Behavior, 26, 239-260. doi:10.1177/001391659402600206
52.
SeebauerS.FleißJ.SchweighartM. (2016). A household is not a person: Consistency of pro-environmental behavior in adult couples and the accuracy of proxy-reports. Environment & Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013916516663796
53.
StegL.DreijerinkL.AbrahamseW. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
54.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
55.
SternP. C. (2000a). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523-530. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.523
56.
SternP. C. (2000b). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
57.
StragierJ.HauttekeeteL.De MarezL.BrondeelR. (2012). Measuring energy-efficient behavior in households: The development of a standardized scale. Ecopsychology, 4, 64-71. doi:10.1089/eco.2012.0026
58.
SwimJ. K.ClaytonS.HowardG. S. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change: Psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66, 251-264. doi:10.1037/a0023472
ThøgersenJ. (2014). Unsustainable consumption: Basic causes and implications for policy. European Psychologist, 19, 84-95. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000176
61.
ThøgersenJ.GrønhøjA. (2010). Electricity saving in households: A social cognitive approach. Energy Policy, 38, 7732-7743. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.025
VerhallenT. M.van RaaijW. F. (1981). Household behavior and the use of natural gas for home heating. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 253-257. doi:10.1086/208862
64.
WillisR. M.StewartR. A.PanuwatwanichK.WilliamsP. R.HollingsworthA. L. (2011). Quantifying the influence of environmental and water conservation attitudes on household end use water consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1996-2009. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.023
65.
YangS.ShipworthM.HuebnerG. (2015). His, hers or both’s? The role of male and female’s attitudes in explaining their home energy use behaviours. Energy and Buildings, 96, 140-148. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.009
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
