Using Public Transport Can Make Up for Flying Abroad on Holiday

Abstract

Compensatory Green Beliefs (CGBs) refer to beliefs that the negative effects of energy-inefficient or unsustainable behaviors (e.g., flying abroad on holiday) can be compensated for by engaging in energy-efficient or sustainable practices (e.g., using public transport). The present research developed and validated a scale to measure endorsement of CGBs. This scale formed part of an online survey, which investigated the relationship between endorsement of CGBs and how people think and behave in relation to energy and environmental issues. Factor analysis confirmed the reliability of a 16-item, single-factor scale measuring CGBs. Endorsement of CGBs was found to correlate negatively with measures of proecological behavior, environmental values, “green” identity, concern with climate change, age, and education level. These findings offer an insight into the possible cognitive antecedents of “rebound effects” that are known to limit the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce energy consumption and promote sustainable behavior.

Keywords

compensatory beliefs conservation environmental attitudes energy environment ecological behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albarracin

Leeper

Wang

(2009). Immediate increase in food intake following exercise messages. Obesity, 17, 1451-1452. doi:10.1038/oby.2009.16

Basile

White

(2000). Environmental literacy: Providing an interdisciplinary context for young children. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1, 201-208.

Bratt

(1999). Consumers’ environmental behavior: Generalized, sector-based or compensatory? Environment and Behavior, 31, 28-44. doi:10.1177/00139169921971985

Brunk

C. G.

(2006). Public knowledge, public trust: Understanding the “knowledge deficit.” Community Genetics, 9, 178-183.

Cook

A. J.

Kerr

G. N.

Moore

(2002). Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 557-572. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00117-4

Darby

(2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Oxford, UK: Environmental Change Institute. Retrievable from http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/downloads/smart-metering-report.pdf

Department for Communities and Local Government. (2010). Focus on behaviour change—Reducing energy demand in homes. London, UK: Crown.

Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2011). Smart metering implementation programme: A consultation on the detailed policy design of the regulatory and commercial framework for DCC. London, England: Crown. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121217150421/http://decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/consultation/smart-metering-imp-prog/2883-cons-detailed-policy-design-of-dcc.pdf

Dunlap

Van Liere

(1978). The new environmental paradigm: A proposed instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.

10.

Dunlap

Van Liere

Mertig

Jones

R. E.

(2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176

11.

Durant

(1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26, 313-319.

12.

Ernsting

Schwarzer

Lippke

Schneider

(2013). “I don’t need a flu shot because I lead a healthy lifestyle”: Compensatory health beliefs make vaccination less likely. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(6), 825-836. doi:10.1177/1359105312455076

13.

Exline

J. J.

Worthington

E. L.

Hill

McCullough

M. E.

(2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337-348. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_06

14.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

15.

Gatersleben

Steg

Vlek

(2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335-362. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004

16.

Geller

Attali

(2005). The experience with energy efficiency policies and programmes in IEA countries: Learning from the critics (IEA information paper). Paris, France: International Energy Agency.

17.

Gössling

Broderick

Upham

Ceron

J.-P.

Dubois

Peeters

Strasdas

(2007). Voluntary carbon offsetting schemes for aviation: Efficiency, credibility and sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15, 223-248.

18.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.

19.

Greene

D. L.

(1992). Vehicle use and fuel economy: How big is the “rebound” effect? Energy Journal, 13, 117-143.

20.

Greening

L. A.

Greene

D. L.

(1998). Energy use, technical efficiency, and the rebound effect: A review of the literature. Denver, CO: Hagler Bailly.

21.

Hansen

Holm

Frewer

Robinson

Sandøe

(2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41, 111-121. doi:10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00079-5

22.

International Panel on Climate Change. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

23.

Kaiser

F. G.

Doka

Hofstetter

Ranney

M. A.

(2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11-20. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0

24.

Kaiser

F. G.

Frick

Stoll-Kleemann

(2001). Zur Angemessenheit selbstberichteten Verhaltens: Eine Validitätsuntersuchung der Skala Allgemeinen Ökologischen Verhaltens [Accuracy of self-reports: Validating the General Ecological Behavior Scale]. Diagnostica, 47, 88-95.

25.

Kaiser

F. G.

Keller

(2001). Disclosing situational constraints to ecological behavior: A confirmatory application of the mixed Rasch model. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 212-221. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.212

26.

Kaiser

F. G.

Wölfing

Fuhrer

(1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0107

27.

Kaklamanou

Armitage

C. J.

Jones

C. R.

(2013). A further look into compensatory health beliefs: A think aloud study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 139-154. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02097.x

28.

Knäuper

Rabiau

Cohen

Patriciu

(2004). Compensatory health beliefs: Scale development and psychometric properties. Psychology & Health, 19, 607-624. doi:10.1080/0887044042000196737

29.

Kronick

Knäuper

(2010). Temptations elicit compensatory intentions. Appetite, 54, 398-401. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.011

30.

Mannetti

Pierro

Livi

(2004). Recycling: Planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 227-236. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.01.002

31.

Milne

Boardman

(2000). Making cold homes warmer: The effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes. Energy Policy, 28, 411-424.

32.

Nigg

C. R.

Lee

H.-R.

Hubbard

A. E.

Min-Sun

(2009). Gateway health behaviors in college students: Investigating transfer and compensation effects. Journal of American College Health, 58, 39-44. doi:0.3200/JACH.58.1.39-44

33.

Pe’er

Goldman

Yavetz

(2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: Attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. Journal of Environmental Education, 39, 45-59.

34.

Rabiau

Knäuper

Miquelon

(2006). The external quest for optimal balance between maximizing pleasure and minimizing harm: The compensatory health beliefs model. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 139-153. doi:10.1348/135910705X52237

35.

Radtke

Scholz

Keller

Knäuper

Hornung

(2011). Smoking-specific compensatory health beliefs and the readiness to stop smoking in adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 610-625. doi:10.1348/2044-8287.002001

36.

Ray

J. J.

(1984). The reliability of short social desirability scales. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 133-134.

37.

Scholz

R. W.

(2011). Environmental literacy in science and society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

38.

Sorrell

(2007). The rebound effect: An assessment of the evidence for economy wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. London, England: UK Energy Research Centre.

39.

Sorrell

Dimitropoulos

Sommerville

(2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37, 1356-1371. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.026

40.

Sparks

Shepherd

(1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with “green consumerism.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 388-399.

41.

Spence

Venables

Pidgeon

Poortinga

Demski

(2010). Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures in Britain: Summary findings of a survey conducted from January to March 2010 (Understanding Risk Working Paper 10-01). Cardiff University. Retrieved from http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/climate-change-public-perceptions-of-climate-change-report.pdf

42.

St. Clair

. (2003). Words for the world: Creating critical environmental literacy for adults. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003, 69-78.

43.

Steg

Vlek

(2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

44.

Stern

P. C.

(2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175

45.

Thøgersen

Olander

(2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 225-236. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5

46.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2009). Report of the conference of the parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. Addendum. Part Two: Action taken by the conference of the parties at its fifteenth session. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/meetings/copenhagen_dec_2009/items/5262.php

47.

U.S. Climate Action Report. (2010). United States Department of State (June 2010). Washington, DC: Global Publishing Services. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/usa_nc5.pdf

48.

Whitmarsh

O’Neill

(2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305-314. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003

49.

The World Bank. (2010). World development indicators. Retrieved from http://www.google.co.uk/publicdata/home