Two studies, comprising 128 participants, were conducted to examine possible detrimental effects of noise and moderate heat stress on decision making. Three tasks involving risky decisions were used: a lottery choice task, the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, and two risk scenario questionnaires. Study 1 (n = 97) involved three noise stressors presented at 60dB(A) and a quiet condition. Compared with all other conditions, a radio podcast about the jubilee of museums caused a significant increase in risk aversion in the Choice Dilemma Questionnaire task. Study 2 (n = 31) compared two groups that completed the aforementioned tasks either in a warm (≥ 30°C) or neutral (≤ 25°C) ambient temperature condition. Participants made significantly riskier decisions in the warm ambient temperature condition in all tasks except the lottery task. Effects were more pronounced among female subjects. Especially elevated ambient temperatures should, therefore, be monitored in office environments to prevent impairments of decision making.
ASHRAE 55. (2013). Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
2.
BaronR. A.BellP. A. (1976). Aggression and heat: The influence of ambient temperature, negative affect, and a cooling drink on physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 245-255. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.3.245
3.
BassiA.ColacitoR.FulghieriP. (2013). O sole mio: An experimental analysis of weather and risk attitudes in financial decisions. The Review of Financial Studies, 26, 1824-1852. doi:10.1093/rfs/hht004
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.MuravenM.TiceD. E. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
5.
BecharaA.DamasioA. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336-372. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
6.
ByrnesJ. P.MillerD. C.SchaferW. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383.
7.
CharnessG.GneezyU. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50-58. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
8.
ClarkC. M.PetersonP. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York, NY: Macmillan. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
9.
DamasioA. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Avon Books.
10.
De LangheB.SweldensS.van OsselaerS. M. J.TukM. (2008). The emotional information processing system is risk averse: Ego-depletion and investment behavior (ERIM Report Series No. ERS-2008-064-MKT). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1292183
11.
FoxJ. (2015). From economic man to behavioral economics. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 78-85.
12.
FreemanN.MuravenM. (2010). Self-control depletion leads to increased risk taking. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 175-181. doi:10.1177/1948550609360421
13.
FrontczakM.SchiavonS.GoinsJ.ArensE. A.ZhangH.WargockiP. (2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air, 22, 119-131. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
GlassD. C.SingerJ. E.FriedmanL. N. (1969). Psychic cost of adaptation to an environmental stressor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 200-210. doi:0.1037/h0027629
16.
HancockP. A.RossJ. M.SzalmaJ. L. (2007). A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors. Human Factors, 49, 851-877. doi:10.1518/001872007X230226
17.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
18.
HoltC. A.LauryS. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92, 1644-1655. doi:10.1257/000282802762024700
19.
HongistoV. (2005). A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance. Indoor Air, 15, 458-468. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00391.x
20.
HyggeS.KnezI. (2001). Effects of noise, heat and indoor lighting on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 291-299. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0222
21.
ISO 10551. (1995). Ergonomics of the thermal environment: Assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
22.
ISO 7730. (2005). Ergonomics of the thermal environment: Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
JahnckeH.HyggeS.HalinN.GreenA. M.DimbergK. (2011). Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 373-382. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002
25.
KarjalainenS. (2012). Thermal comfort and gender: A literature review. Indoor Air, 22, 96-109. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x
26.
KenrickD. T.MacFarlaneS. W. (1986). Ambient temperature and horn honking: A field study of the heat/aggression relationship. Environment and Behavior, 18, 179-191. doi:10.1177/0013916586182002
27.
KoganN.WallachM. A. (1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
28.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC. W.TauschA. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the positive and negative affect schedule]. Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
29.
LangF. R.LüdtkeO.AsendorpfJ. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) in young, middle-aged, and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47, 111-121. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111
30.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. E.StuartG. L.. . . BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
31.
LighthallN. R.MatherM.GorlickM. A. (2009). Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. PLoS ONE, 4, e6002. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006002
MaulaH.HongistoV.ÖstmanL.HaapakangasA.KoskelaH.HyönäJ. (2016). The effect of slightly warm temperature on work performance and comfort in open-plan offices—A laboratory study. Indoor Air, 26, 286-297. doi:10.1111/ina.12209
34.
MorgadoP.SousaN.CerqueiraJ. J. (2015). The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 93, 839-847. doi:10.1002/jnr.23521
35.
MuellerS. T.PiperB. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250-259. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024
36.
NicholsonN.SoaneE.Fenton-O’CreevyM.WillmanP. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 157-176. doi:10.1080/1366987032000123856
37.
PandolfK. B.BurrR. E. (2001). Medical aspects of harsh environments (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Target Market Media.
38.
PorcelliA. J.DelgadoM. R. (2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20, 278-283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02288.x
39.
RashidM.ZimringC. (2008). A review of the empirical literature on the relationships between indoor environment and stress in health care and office settings. Environment and Behavior, 40, 151-190. doi:10.1177/0013916507311550
40.
RohrmannB. (2005). Risk Scenarios Questionnaire (RSQ) German version. Melbourne, Australia: Roman Roads Research Association. Available from www.rohrmannresearch.net
41.
RomanovskyA. A. (2007). Thermoregulation: Some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 292, 37-46. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00668.2006
SundstromE.TownJ. P.RiceR. W.OsbornD. P.BrillM. (1994). Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment and Behavior, 26, 195-222. doi:10.1177/001391659402600204
44.
SzalmaJ. L.HancockP. A. (2011). Noise effects on human performance: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 682-707. doi:10.1037/a0023987
45.
UngerA.StahlbergD. (2011). Ego-depletion and risk behavior: Too exhausted to take a risk. Social Psychology, 42, 28-38. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000040
46.
Van SomerenE. J. V. (2007). Thermoregulation and aging. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 292, 99-107. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00557.2006
47.
VarjoJ.HongistoV.HaapakangasA.MaulaH.KoskelaH.HyönäJ. (2015). Simultaneous effects of irrelevant speech, temperature and ventilation rate on performance and satisfaction in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 16-33. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.08.001
48.
VenetjokiN.Kaarlela-TuomaalaA.KeskinenE.HongistoV. (2006). The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49, 1068-1091. doi:10.1080/00140130600679142
49.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1990). Schallschutz und akustische Gestaltung im Büro. [Sound insulation and acoustic design in offices]. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.
50.
WeberE. U.BlaisA.-R.BetzN. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290. doi:10.1002/bdm.414
51.
WeinsteinN. D. (1978). Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 458-466. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.458
52.
Westdeutscher Rundfunk 2. (2014a, October16). Ebola—Wie gefährlich ist das Virus für uns? (Ebola—how dangerous is the virus for us?) [Audio podcast].
53.
Westdeutscher Rundfunk 3. (2014b, July6). 5 Jahre Ruhr-Kunst Museeum (5 years Ruhr-Art museum) [Audio podcast].
54.
WittersehT.WyonD. P.ClausenG. (2004). The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl. 8), 30-40. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00305.x
55.
ZuckermanM.KuhlmanD. M. (2000). Personality and risk taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999-1029. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00124
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
