In the Heat and Noise of the Moment: Effects on Risky Decision Making

Abstract

Two studies, comprising 128 participants, were conducted to examine possible detrimental effects of noise and moderate heat stress on decision making. Three tasks involving risky decisions were used: a lottery choice task, the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, and two risk scenario questionnaires. Study 1 (n = 97) involved three noise stressors presented at 60dB(A) and a quiet condition. Compared with all other conditions, a radio podcast about the jubilee of museums caused a significant increase in risk aversion in the Choice Dilemma Questionnaire task. Study 2 (n = 31) compared two groups that completed the aforementioned tasks either in a warm (≥ 30°C) or neutral (≤ 25°C) ambient temperature condition. Participants made significantly riskier decisions in the warm ambient temperature condition in all tasks except the lottery task. Effects were more pronounced among female subjects. Especially elevated ambient temperatures should, therefore, be monitored in office environments to prevent impairments of decision making.

Keywords

noise ambient temperature moderate heat stress risky decision making risk preferences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASHRAE 55. (2013). Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

Baron

R. A.

Bell

P. A.

(1976). Aggression and heat: The influence of ambient temperature, negative affect, and a cooling drink on physical aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 245-255. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.33.3.245

Bassi

Colacito

Fulghieri

(2013). O sole mio: An experimental analysis of weather and risk attitudes in financial decisions. The Review of Financial Studies, 26, 1824-1852. doi:10.1093/rfs/hht004

Baumeister

R. F.

Bratslavsky

Muraven

Tice

D. E.

(1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252

Bechara

Damasio

A. R.

(2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336-372. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010

Byrnes

J. P.

Miller

D. C.

Schafer

W. D.

(1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383.

Charness

Gneezy

(2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50-58. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007

Clark

C. M.

Peterson

P. L.

(1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In Wittrock

M. C.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York, NY: Macmillan. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

Damasio

A. R.

(1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Avon Books.

10.

De Langhe

Sweldens

van Osselaer

S. M. J.

Tuk

. (2008). The emotional information processing system is risk averse: Ego-depletion and investment behavior (ERIM Report Series No. ERS-2008-064-MKT). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1292183

11.

Fox

(2015). From economic man to behavioral economics. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 78-85.

12.

Freeman

Muraven

(2010). Self-control depletion leads to increased risk taking. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 175-181. doi:10.1177/1948550609360421

13.

Frontczak

Schiavon

Goins

Arens

E. A.

Zhang

Wargocki

(2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air, 22, 119-131. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x

14.

Gabovitch

(2013, December 27). The office [Office ambience sound file]. Retrieved from http://freesound.org/people/qubodup/sounds/211945

15.

Glass

D. C.

Singer

J. E.

Friedman

L. N.

(1969). Psychic cost of adaptation to an environmental stressor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 200-210. doi:0.1037/h0027629

16.

Hancock

P. A.

Ross

J. M.

Szalma

J. L.

(2007). A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors. Human Factors, 49, 851-877. doi:10.1518/001872007X230226

17.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P. A.

Meshkati

(Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

18.

Holt

C. A.

Laury

S. K.

(2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92, 1644-1655. doi:10.1257/000282802762024700

19.

Hongisto

(2005). A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance. Indoor Air, 15, 458-468. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00391.x

20.

Hygge

Knez

(2001). Effects of noise, heat and indoor lighting on cognitive performance and self-reported affect. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 291-299. doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0222

21.

ISO 10551. (1995). Ergonomics of the thermal environment: Assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

22.

ISO 7730. (2005). Ergonomics of the thermal environment: Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.

23.

Iyengar

(2011). How to make choosing easier. TEDSalon. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/sheena_iyengar_choosing_what_to_choose

24.

Jahncke

Hygge

Halin

Green

A. M.

Dimberg

(2011). Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 373-382. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002

25.

Karjalainen

(2012). Thermal comfort and gender: A literature review. Indoor Air, 22, 96-109. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x

26.

Kenrick

D. T.

MacFarlane

S. W.

(1986). Ambient temperature and horn honking: A field study of the heat/aggression relationship. Environment and Behavior, 18, 179-191. doi:10.1177/0013916586182002

27.

Kogan

Wallach

M. A.

(1964). Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

28.

Krohne

H. W.

Egloff

Kohlmann

C. W.

Tausch

(1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the positive and negative affect schedule]. Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.

29.

Lang

F. R.

Lüdtke

Asendorpf

J. B.

(2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) in young, middle-aged, and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47, 111-121. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111

30.

Lejuez

C. W.

Read

J. P.

Kahler

C. W.

Richards

J. B.

Ramsey

S. E.

Stuart

G. L.

. . . Brown

R. A.

(2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75-84. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75

31.

Lighthall

N. R.

Mather

Gorlick

M. A.

(2009). Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. PLoS ONE, 4, e6002. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006002

32.

Loewenstein

G. F.

Weber

E. U.

Hsee

C. K.

Welch

(2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286. doi:10.1037//0033-2902.127.2.267

33.

Maula

Hongisto

Östman

Haapakangas

Koskela

Hyönä

(2016). The effect of slightly warm temperature on work performance and comfort in open-plan offices—A laboratory study. Indoor Air, 26, 286-297. doi:10.1111/ina.12209

34.

Morgado

Sousa

Cerqueira

J. J.

(2015). The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 93, 839-847. doi:10.1002/jnr.23521

35.

Mueller

S. T.

Piper

B. J.

(2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250-259. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024

36.

Nicholson

Soane

Fenton-O’Creevy

Willman

(2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 157-176. doi:10.1080/1366987032000123856

37.

Pandolf

K. B.

Burr

R. E.

(2001). Medical aspects of harsh environments (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Target Market Media.

38.

Porcelli

A. J.

Delgado

M. R.

(2009). Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychological Science, 20, 278-283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02288.x

39.

Rashid

Zimring

(2008). A review of the empirical literature on the relationships between indoor environment and stress in health care and office settings. Environment and Behavior, 40, 151-190. doi:10.1177/0013916507311550

40.

Rohrmann

(2005). Risk Scenarios Questionnaire (RSQ) German version. Melbourne, Australia: Roman Roads Research Association. Available from www.rohrmannresearch.net

41.

Romanovsky

A. A.

(2007). Thermoregulation: Some concepts have changed. Functional architecture of the thermoregulatory system. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 292, 37-46. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00668.2006

42.

Shellenbarger

(2016, June 8). Let the office thermostat wars begin. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/let-the-office-thermostat-wars-begin-1465319614

43.

Sundstrom

Town

J. P.

Rice

R. W.

Osborn

D. P.

Brill

(1994). Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment and Behavior, 26, 195-222. doi:10.1177/001391659402600204

44.

Szalma

J. L.

Hancock

P. A.

(2011). Noise effects on human performance: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 682-707. doi:10.1037/a0023987

45.

Unger

Stahlberg

(2011). Ego-depletion and risk behavior: Too exhausted to take a risk. Social Psychology, 42, 28-38. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000040

46.

Van Someren

E. J. V

. (2007). Thermoregulation and aging. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 292, 99-107. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00557.2006

47.

Varjo

Hongisto

Haapakangas

Maula

Koskela

Hyönä

(2015). Simultaneous effects of irrelevant speech, temperature and ventilation rate on performance and satisfaction in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 16-33. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.08.001

48.

Venetjoki

Kaarlela-Tuomaala

Keskinen

Hongisto

(2006). The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49, 1068-1091. doi:10.1080/00140130600679142

49.

Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1990). Schallschutz und akustische Gestaltung im Büro. [Sound insulation and acoustic design in offices]. Berlin: Beuth Verlag.

50.

Weber

E. U.

Blais

A.-R.

Betz

N. E.

(2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290. doi:10.1002/bdm.414

51.

Weinstein

N. D.

(1978). Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 458-466. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.458

52.

Westdeutscher Rundfunk 2. (2014a, October 16). Ebola—Wie gefährlich ist das Virus für uns? (Ebola—how dangerous is the virus for us?) [Audio podcast].

53.

Westdeutscher Rundfunk 3. (2014b, July 6). 5 Jahre Ruhr-Kunst Museeum (5 years Ruhr-Art museum) [Audio podcast].

54.

Witterseh

Wyon

D. P.

Clausen

. (2004). The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl. 8), 30-40. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00305.x

55.

Zuckerman

Kuhlman

D. M.

(2000). Personality and risk taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999-1029. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00124

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB