Pro-environmental behaviors have been analyzed in the home, with little attention to other important contexts of everyday life, such as the workplace. The research reported here explored three categories of pro-environmental behavior (consumption of materials and energy, waste generation, and work-related commuting) in a public large-scale organization in Spain, with the aim of identifying the most effective policy options for a sustainable organization. Agent-based modeling was used to design a virtual simulation of the organization. Psychologically informed profiles of employees were defined using data gathered through a questionnaire, measuring knowledge, motivations, and ability. Future scenarios were developed using a participatory backcasting scenario development methodology, and policy tracks were derived. Dynamic simulations indicated that, to be effective, organizational policy should strengthen worker participation and autonomy, be sustained over time, and should combine different measures of medium intensity for behavior change, instead of isolated policies of high intensity.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 265-276. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
2.
AjzenI. (1987). Attitudes, traits and actions: Dispositional predictions of behavior in personality and social psychology. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-63). Nueva York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60411-6
3.
AjzenI. (2006). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665-683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
4.
AmourouxE.HurauxT.SempéF.SabouretN.HaradjiY. (2013). Simulating human activities to investigate household energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART) (Vol. 2, pp. 71-80). doi:10.5220/0004225100710080
5.
AndrewsC. J.SenickJ. A.WenerR. E. (2012). Incorporating occupant perceptions and behavior into BIM. In Mallory-HillS.PreiserW.WatsonC. (Eds.), Enhancing building performance (pp. 234-246). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
AndrewsC. J.YiD.KrogmannU.SenickJ.WenerR. E. (2011). Designing buildings for real occupants: An agent-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 41, 1077-1091. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2116116
7.
AzarE.MenassaC. (2012). Agent-based modeling of occupants | their impact on energy use in commercial buildings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26(4), 506-518. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000158
8.
BambergS.MoserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
9.
BarrS.ShawG.ColesT. (2011). Sustainable lifestyles: Sites, practices, and policy. Environment and Planning A, 43, 3011-3029. doi:10.1068/a43529
10.
BonnesM.UzzellD.CarrusG.KelayT. (2007). Inhabitants’ versus experts’ assessment of environmental quality for urban sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 59-78. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00496.x
11.
BorghesiA.MilanoM.GavanelliM.WoodsT. (2013, May27-30). Simulation of incentive mechanisms for renewable energy policies. 27th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, European Council for Modelling and Simulation, Ålesund, Norway. doi:10.7148/2013
12.
BromanG. I.RobèrtK.-H (2016). A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.121
13.
CarrusG.NenciA. M.CaddeoP. (2009).The role of ethnic identity and perceived ethnic norms in the purchase of ethnical food products. Appetite, 52(1), 65-71. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2008.08.003
14.
Corral-VerdugoV.CarrusG.BonnesM.MoserG.SinhaJ. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: Towards a New Human Interdependence Paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703-725. doi:10.1177/0013916507308786
15.
DavisM. C.ChallengerR (2015). Environmentally sustainable work behaviors. In FloodP. C.FreeneyY. (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of management: Organizational behavior (3rd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 1-3). Chichester, UK: John Wiley, doi: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom110022.
16.
de GrootJ. I. M.StegL (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 318-332. doi:10.1177/0022022107300278
17.
de GrootJ. I. M.StegL (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40, 330-354. doi:10.1177/0013916506297832
18.
de GrootJ.I.M.StegL (2009), Mean or green? Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior?Conservation Letters, 2, 61-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x
19.
DumitruA.De GregorioE.BonnesM.BonaiutoM.CarrusG.García-MiraR.MaricchioloF. (2016). Low-carbon energy behaviors in the workplace: A qualitative study in Italy and Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 49-59. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.005
20.
DumitruA.García-MiraR.Vega-MarcoteP.Muñoz CanteroJ. M.ErdeiI.IlinC.. . . RuepertL. (2013). Pathways to sustainable change in organizations: The role of participatory backcasting in ensuring workers’ autonomy and control as well as transference of practices between life domains. In QuistJ.WittmayerJ.UmpfenbachK.BaulerT. (Eds.), Pathways, Transitions and Backcasting for Low-Carbon and Sustainable Lifestyles. Sustainable Consumption Transitions Series, Issue 3, Proceedings of SCORAI Europe & InContext Workshop, 7-8 October 2013, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:7857a603-f9a0-4aab-bdd7-d640ee648e1b?collection=research
21.
EdmondsB. (2013). Agent-based social simulation and its necessity for understanding socially embedded phenomena. In ConteR.AndrighettoG.CampennìM. (Eds.), Minding Norms—Mechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies (pp. 34-49). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research. (2000). Version 3.2, fast track 2000 project. Retrieved from http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
23.
FornaraF.CarrusG.PassafaroP.BonnesM. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on pro-environmental behaviors: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 623-635. doi:10.1177/1368430211408149
24.
García-MiraR. (2009). Sostenibilidad y cultura ambiental: aspectos psicosociales, educativos y de participación pública [Sustainability and environmental culture: Psychosocial, educational and public participation aspects]. In García-MiraR.VegaP. (Dirs.), Sostenibilidad, valores y cultura ambiental (pp. 31-55). Madrid, Spain: Pirámide.
25.
García-MiraR.DumitruA (Coords.). (2014). Low carbon at work: Modeling agents and organizations to achieve transitions to a low carbon Europe (Research Report of LOCAW project). A Coruña, Spain: Instituto de Estudios e Investigación Psicosocial.
26.
García-MiraR.DumitruA.Vega-MarcoteP.Alonso-BetanzosA. (2012, May2-4). Patterns of sustainable production and consumption in large-scale organizations: Multi-method approaches to the study of workplace practices. In SieberW.SchweighoferM. (Eds.), SPC Meets Industry. Proceedings of the 15th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production (pp. 185-194). Vienna, Austria: Austrian Institute of Ecology.
27.
García-MiraR.Real DeusJ. E.DuránM.RomayJ. (2003). Predicting environmental attitudes and behavior. In MoserG.PolE.BernardY.BonnesM.CorralizaJ. A.GiulianiM. V. (Eds.), People, places and sustainability (pp. 302-311). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
28.
GiddensA. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
GriskeviciusV.Van den BerghB.TyburJ. M. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392-404. doi:10.1037/a0017346
31.
HofstedeG. J. (1992). Modesty in modeling: On the applicability of interactive planning systems with a case study in pot plant cultivation (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Computer Science, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/133367
32.
HolmbergJ. (1998). Backcasting: A natural step in operationalising sustainable development. Greener Management International, 23, 30-51.
33.
HolmbergJ.RobèrtK.-H. (2000). Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles—A framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 7, 291-308.
34.
JagerW.MoslerH. J. (2007). Simulating human behavior for understanding and managing environmental dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 97-116. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00498.x
35.
KokK.Van VlietM.BärlundI.DubelA.SendzimirJ. (2011). Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 835-851. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.004
36.
Koltko-RiveraM. E. (2004).The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8, 3-58. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
37.
LiX.MaoW.ZengD.WangF. (2008). Agent-based social simulation and modeling in social computing. In YangC. C.et al. (Eds.), ISI 2008 Workshops, LNCS 5075 (pp. 401-412). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69304-8_41
38.
LoS. H.PetersG.-J. Y.KokG. (2012). A review of determinants of and interventions for proenvironmental behaviors in organizations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2933-2967. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00969.x
39.
MaelF.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
40.
MatthewsR. B.GilbertN.RoachA.PolhillJ. G.GottsN. M. (2007). Agent-based land use models: A review of applications. Landscape Ecology, 22, 1447-1459. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1
41.
McIntoshB. S.JeffreyP.LemonM.WinderN. (2005). On the design of computer-based models for integrated environmental science. Environmental Management, 35, 741-752. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0172-0
42.
McIntoshB. S.SeatonR. A. F.JeffreyP. (2007). Tools to think with? Towards understanding the use of computer-based support tools in policy relevant research. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 640-648. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.015
43.
MehraA.KilduffM.BrassD. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121-146. doi:10.2307/2667127
44.
NolanJ. P.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913-923. doi:10.1177/0146167208316691
45.
OhH. S.ChungM. H.LabiancaG. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860-875. doi:10.2307/20159627
46.
PolhillJ. G.GottsN. M. (2006, August21-25). A new approach to modeling frameworks. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Social Simulation (WCSS 2006), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
47.
PolhillJ. G.SutherlandL.-A.GottsN. M. (2010). Using qualitative evidence to enhance an agent-based modeling system for studying land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13, 10. doi:10.18564/jasss.1563
48.
QuinlanJ. R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning (Vol. 1). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
49.
QuistJ.VergragtP. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures, 38, 1027-1045. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.010
50.
RobinsonJ. (2003). Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35, 839-856.
51.
RonaldN.DignumV.JonkerC.ArentzeT.TimmermansH. (2012). On the engineering of agent-based simulations of social activities with social networks. Information and Software Technology, 54, 625-638. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.12.004
52.
RuepertA.KeizerK.StegL.García-MiraR.DumitruA.Vega-MarcoteP.. . . BonnesM. (2013). Report on the results of analysis of questionnaires: Four case studies (Deliverable 4.2 of the LOCAW Project, Non published Internal Report). A Coruña, Spain: University of A Coruna.
53.
SalgadoM.GilbertN. (2012). Emergence and communication in computational sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 43, 87-110. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12004
54.
Sánchez-MaroñoN.Alonso-BetanzosA.Fontenla-RomeroO.Bolón-CanedoV.GottsN. M.PolhillJ. G.. . . García-MiraR. (2012). An agent-based prototype for enhancing sustainability behavior at an academic environment. In Bajo PérezJ.et al. (Eds.), Highlights on practical applications of agents and multi-agent systems. Advances in intelligent and soft computing (Vol. 156, pp. 257-264). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
Sánchez-MaroñoN.Alonso-BetanzosA.Fontenla-RomeroO.Brinquis-NúñezC.PolhillJ. G.CraigT. (2014). Influence of internal values and social networks for achieving sustainable organizations. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2014). Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence Workshop (PAIS) (pp. 1179-1184). Prague, Czech Republic: IOS Press.
56.
Sánchez-MaroñoN.Alonso-BetanzosA.Fontenla-RomeroO.Brinquis-NúñezC.PolhillJ. G.CraigT.García-MiraR. (2015). An agent-based model for simulating environmental behavior in an educational organization. Neural Processing Letters, 42, 89-118. doi:10.1007/s11063-014-9390-5
57.
SchultzP. W.KhazianA. M.ZaleskiA. C. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3, 4-23. doi:10.1080/15534510701755614
58.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 221-279). New York, NY: Academic Press.
59.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 89-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Academic Press.
60.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. doi:0022-4537/94/1200-0019$03.00/1
61.
SissaG.DamianiE. (2015). An agent-based model for awareness-based sustainability. In LiuX.LiY. (Eds.), Green services engineering, optimization, and modeling in the technological age (pp. 149-166). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8447-8
62.
SparroweR. T.LidenR. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-552. doi:10.5465/AMR.1997.9707154068
63.
SparroweR. T.LidenR. C.WayneS. J.KraimerM. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325. doi:10.2307/3069458
64.
SquazzoniF.JagerW.EdmondsB. (2013). Social simulation in the social sciences: A brief overview. Social Science Computer Review, 20(10), 1-16. doi:10.1177/0894439313512975
65.
StegL.de GrootJ. I. M. (2010). Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 725-743. doi:10.1348/014466609X477745
66.
StegL.de GrootJ. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. In ClaytonS. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 81-92). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
StegL.PerlaviciuteG.Van der WerffE.LurvinkJ. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally-relevant attitudes, preferences and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46, 163-192. doi:10.1177/0013916512454730
68.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
69.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
70.
SternP. C.DietzT. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x
71.
SvenfeltA.EngströmR.SvaneO. (2011). Decreased energy use in buildings by 50% by 2050—A backcasting study using stakeholder groups. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 785-796. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.005
72.
TorrensP. M. (2003). Cellular automata and multi-agent systems as planning support tools. In GeertmanS.StillwellJ. (Eds.), Planning support systems in practice (pp. 205-222). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
73.
TudorT. L.BarrS. W.GilgA. W. (2008). A novel conceptual framework for examining environmental behavior in large organizations—A case study of the Cornwall National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. Environment and Behavior, 40, 426-450. doi:10.1177/0013916507300664
74.
TuragaR. M. R.HowarthR. B.BorsukM. E. (2010). Pro-environmental behavior: Rational choice meets moral motivation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185, 211-224. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05163.x
75.
UzzellD.PolE.BadenasD. (2002). Place identification, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Environment and Behavior, 34, 26-53. doi:10.1177/0013916502034001003
76.
UzzellD.RäthzelN.García-MiraR.DumitruA. (2017). Global challenges for environmental psychology: The role of labor and production. In Fleury-BahiG.PolE.NavarroO. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 559-574). Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7
77.
Van BerkelD. B.VerburgP. H. (2012). Combining exploratory scenarios and participatory backcasting: Using an agent-based mode in participatory policy design for a multi-functional landscape. Landscape Ecology, 27, 641-658. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9730-7
78.
Van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2014). I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46, 626-657. doi:10.1177/0013916512475209
79.
VergragtP. J.QuistJ. (2011). Backcasting for sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 747-755. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
80.
VerplankenB.WoodW. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. American Marketing Association, 25, 90-103. doi:10.1509/jppm.25.1.90
81.
VossA.YouJ. Y.YenE.ChenH. Y.LinS.TurnerA.LinJ. P. (2010, December). Scalable social simulation: Investigating population-scale phenomena using commodity computing. Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Conference on e-Science, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. doi:10.1109/eScience.2010.46
82.
WangelJ. (2011). Exploring social structures and agency in backcasting studies for sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 872-882. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.007
83.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305-314. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
