Sustainable consumption is viewed as a social dilemma, in which individual rational choices lead to long-term collective harm. Construal level theory explains social dilemmas by the underlying conflict between psychologically distant and psychologically proximate goals, in which distant (sustainable) goals are relevant, but proximate goals determine actual choices. Identity theory suggests that a sustainable self-concept could increase the psychological proximity of, and thus explain, sustainable behavior. This is tested in two empirical studies in The Netherlands. The first study (n = 229) shows that sustainable identity predicts sustainable preference, partly mediated by proximate self-confirmation motives. This mediation is moderated by sustainable identity. The second study (n = 1,453 households) confirms that sustainable identity directly and indirectly influences the proximate determinance of sustainable attributes, and through this determinance sustainable product choice. Jointly these studies suggest that sustainable identity explains sustainable consumption as it provides a psychologically proximate motive to act sustainably.
ArnockyS.MilfontT. L.NicolR. N. (2014). Time perspective and sustainable behavior: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 556-582. doi:10.1177/0013916512474987
2.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
3.
Bar-AnanY.LibermanN.TropeY. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609-622.
4.
BarbutoJ.E.JrSchollR. W. (1998). Motivation sources inventory: Development and validation of new scales to measure an integrative taxonomy of motivation. Psychological Reports, 82, 1011-1022.
5.
BartelsJ.van den BergI. (2011). Fresh fruit and vegetables and the added value of antioxidants: Attitudes of non-, light, and heavy organic food users. British Food Journal, 113, 1339-1352.
6.
BergerJ.HeathC. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 121-134.
7.
BielA.ThøgersenJ. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93-112.
8.
BöhmG.PfisterH. R. (2005). Consequences, morality, and time in environmental risk evaluation. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 461-479.
9.
BulteE.HoranR. D. (2010). Identities in the commons: The dynamics of norms and social capital. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10, 13.
10.
ChenM. F. (2007). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions in relation to organic foods in Taiwan: Moderating effects of food-related personality traits. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 1008-1021.
11.
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45-65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
ClaytonS.OpotowS. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298-310.
13.
CorbettJ. B. (2005). Altruism, self-interest, and the reasonable person model of environmentally responsible behavior. Science Communication, 26, 368-389.
14.
CordanoM.WelcomerS. A.SchererR. F. (2003). An analysis of the predictive validity of the new ecological paradigm scale. Journal of Environmental Education, 34, 22-28. doi:10.1080/00958960309603490
15.
CornelissenG.DewitteS.WarlopL.YzerbytV. (2007). Whatever people say I am, that’s what I am: Social labeling as a social marketing tool. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 278-288.
16.
DawesR. M.MessickD. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111-116.
17.
De CremerD.Van VugtM. (1998). Collective identity and cooperation in a public goods dilemma: A matter of trust or self-efficacy?Current Research in Social Psychology, 3, 1-11.
18.
De GrootJ. I. M.StegL. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 318-332.
19.
De GrootJ. I. M.StegL. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 368-378.
20.
DunlapR. E. (2008). The new environmental paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3-18. doi:10.3200/joee.40.1.3-18
21.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
22.
EngelenB. (2006). Solving the paradox: The expressive rationality of the decision to vote. Rationality and Society, 18, 419-441.
23.
EscalasJ. E.BettmanJ. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 339-348.
24.
EscalasJ. E.BettmanJ. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378-389.
25.
GärlingT. (1999). Value priorities, social value orientations and cooperation in social dilemmas. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 397-408.
26.
GongM.BaronJ.KunreutherH. (2009). Group cooperation under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39, 251-270.
27.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.Van den BerghB. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392-404.
28.
GuptaS.OgdenD. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 378-393.
29.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
30.
HitlinS. (2003). Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 118-137.
31.
HussainS. S. (2000). Green consumerism and ecolabelling: A strategic behavioural model. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 77-89.
32.
JacksonJ. W. (2008). Reactions to social dilemmas as a function of group identity, rational calculations, and social context. Small Group Research, 39, 673-705.
33.
JoiremanJ. A.LasaneT. P.BennettJ.RichardsD.SolaimaniS. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133-155.
34.
JoiremanJ. A.SprottD. E.SpangenbergE. R. (2005). Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1159-1168.
35.
JoiremanJ. A.Van LangeP. A. M.Van VugtM. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behavior, 36, 187-206.
36.
JonesG. (2008). Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959-2003. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 489-497.
37.
KaiserF. G.ByrkaK. (2011). Environmentalism as a trait: Gauging people’s prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 71-79.
38.
KortenkampK. V.MooreC. F. (2006). Time, uncertainty, and individual differences in decisions to cooperate in resource dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 603-615.
39.
LearyM. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317-344.
40.
LibermanN.FörsterJ. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 203-216.
41.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
42.
LibermanN.TropeY.WakslakC. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 113-117.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
45.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
46.
MessickD. M.BrewerM. B. (1983). Solving social dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 11-44.
47.
MichaelidouN.HassanL. M. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concerns, and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 163-170.
48.
MilfontT. L.GouveiaV. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72-82.
49.
NeffW. S.CohenJ. (1967). A method for the analysis of the structure and internal consistency of Q-sort arrays. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 361-368.
50.
Ozcaglar-ToulouseN.ShiuE.ShawD. (2006). In search of fair trade: Ethical consumer decision making in France. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30, 502.
51.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227.
52.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327-339.
53.
SchwartzS. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 349-364.
54.
SchwartzS. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). New York, NY: Academic Press.
55.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
56.
ShawD.ShiuE. (2003). Ethics in consumer choice: A multivariate modelling approach. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1485-1498.
57.
SimpsonB. (2004). Social values, subjective transformations, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 385-395.
58.
SimpsonB. (2006). Social identity and cooperation in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 18, 443-470.
59.
SnelgarR. S. (2006). Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 87-99.
60.
SobelM. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In LeinhardtS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
61.
SpashC. L. (2006). Non-economic motivation for contingent values: Rights and attitudinal beliefs in the willingness to pay for environmental improvements. Land Economics, 82, 602-622.
62.
StegL.DreijerinkL.AbrahamseW. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425.
63.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Comparison of two methods for testing linear hypotheses in tables of proportions. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 772-775.
64.
SteptoeA.PollardT. M.WardleJ. (1995). Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite, 25, 267-284.
65.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
66.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97.
67.
SternP. C.DietzT.KalofL. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
68.
StetsJ. E.BigaC. F. (2003). Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Sociological Theory, 21, 398-423.
69.
StrathmanA.GleicherF.BoningerD. S.EdwardsC. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
70.
StrykerS. (2007). Identity theory and personality theory: Mutual relevance. Journal of Personality, 75, 1083-1102.
71.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
72.
TabelliniG. (2008). The scope of cooperation: Values and incentives. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 905-950.
73.
TaberneroC.HernandezB. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43, 658-675.
74.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
75.
Van DamY. K. (1997). Needs and motives revisited: An integration of theories with implications for green consumption. In ArnottD.BridgewaterS.DibbS.DoyleP.FreemanJ.MelewarT.WongV. (Eds.), Marketing: Progress, prospects, perspectives (pp. 1272-1286). Coventry, UK: Warwick Business School.
76.
Van DamY. K.Van TrijpH. C. M. (2011). Cognitive and motivational structure of sustainability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 726-741.
77.
Van DamY. K.Van TrijpH. C. M. (2013). Relevant or determinant: Importance in certified sustainable food consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 30, 93-101.
78.
Van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2014). I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 626-687. doi:10.1177/0013916512475209
79.
van DijkH.FischerA. R. H.De JongeJ.RoweG.FrewerL. J. (2012). The impact of balanced risk-benefit information and prior attitudes on post-information attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 1958-1983.
80.
Van IttersumK.PenningsJ. M. E.WansinkB.van TrijpH. C. M. (2007). The validity of attribute-importance measurement: A review. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1177-1190.
81.
Van LangeP. A. M.LiebrandW. B. G.MessickD. M.WilkeH. A. M. (1992). Social dilemmas: The state of the art—Introduction and literature review. In LiebrandW. B. G.MessickD. M.WilkeH. A. M. (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and findings (pp. 3-28). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
82.
Van VugtM. (2002). Central, individual, or collective control? Social dilemma strategies for natural resource management. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 783-800.
83.
WardM. K.BroniarczykS. M. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 164-181.
84.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305-314.
