The present study examined how feedback regarding one’s personal impact on the environment, along with feedback regarding one’s group’s impact, influences environmental attitudes, intentions, and self-beliefs. Using a bogus carbon footprint calculator, participants received either moderately or highly negative feedback about their own environmental impact as well as feedback about the average impact of students at their university. Participants expressed the greatest intentions to behave proenvironmentally, especially with behaviors that require a high level of commitment, when their personal feedback was worse than that of their group. Impact of feedback on intentions was not mediated by attitudes, emotions, or self-evaluations, suggesting that participants were not motivated to improve their behaviors because they felt badly about themselves. Instead, people were motivated to change their behaviors when they believed their current behavior differed from that of an important reference group.
AllcottH. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082-1095. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
3.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
4.
BemD. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200. doi:10.1037/h0024835
CarrusG.PassafaroP.BonnesM. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 51-62. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.003
7.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105-109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
8.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
9.
CornelissenG.PandelaereM.WarlopL.DewitteS. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 46-55. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002
10.
de GrootJ.StegL. (2007). General beliefs and the theory of planned behavior: The role of environmental concerns in the TPB. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1817-1836. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00239.x
11.
De VriesN.RuiterR.LeegwaterY. (2002). Fear appeals in persuasive communication. In BartelsG.NelissenW. (Ed.), Marketing for sustainability: Towards transactional policy-making (pp. 96-104). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
12.
De YoungR. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00181
EwingB.GoldfingerS.OurslerA.ReedA.MooreD.WackernagelM. (2009). The ecological footprint atlas 2009. Oakland, CA: Global Footprint Network.
15.
FergusonM. A.BranscombeN. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 135-142. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010
16.
FergusonM. A.BranscombeN. R. (2011, January). The effects of carbon feedback on personal and collective guilt. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
17.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
18.
FishbachA.TropeY. (2008). Implicit and explicit counteractive self-control. In ShahJ. Y.GardnerW. L. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 281-294). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
FujiiS. (2006). Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 262-268. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.003
20.
GoldsteinN.CialdiniR.GriskeviciusV. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472-482. doi:10.1086/586910
21.
HarlandP.StaatsH.WilkeH. A. M. (2007). Situational and personality factors as direct or personal norm mediated predictors of pro-environmental behavior: Questions derived from norm-activation theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 323-334.
22.
HaslamS. A.EllemersN.ReicherS. D.ReynoldsK. J.SchmittM. T. (2010). The social identity perspective today: An overview of its defining ideas. In PostmesT.BranscombeN. R. (Eds.), Rediscovering social identity: Key readings (pp. 341-356). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
23.
HornseyM. J.SmithJ. R.BeggD. (2007). Effects of norms among those with moral conviction: Counter-conformity emerges on intentions but not behaviors. Social Influence, 2, 244-268. doi:10.1080/15534510701476500
24.
KaiserF. G.DokaG.HofstetterP.RanneyM. A. (2003). Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: A life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 11-20. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00075-0
25.
KaiserF. G.SchultzP. W.BerenguerJ.Corral-VerdugoV.TankhaG. (2008). Extending planned environmentalism: Anticipated guilt and embarrassment across cultures. European Psychologist, 13, 288-297. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.288
26.
KaiserF. G.ShimodaT. A. (1999). Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 243-253. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.9123
27.
KaplanS. (2000). Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 491-508. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00180
28.
KogerS. M.ScottB. A. (2007). Psychology and environmental sustainability: A call for integration. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 10-18. doi:10.1207/s15328023top3401_3
29.
LópezA. G.Cuervo-ArangoM. (2008). Relationship among values, beliefs, norms and Ecological behaviour. Psicothema, 20, 623-629.
30.
MazarN.ZhongC. (2010). Do green products make us better people?Psychological Science, 21, 494-498. doi:10.1177/0956797610363538
31.
MintonA. P.RoseR. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 40, 37-48. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00209-3
32.
NolanJ. M.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913-923. doi:10.1177/0146167208316691.
33.
OskampS. (2000). Psychological contributions to achieving an ecologically sustainable future for humanity. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 373-390. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00173
34.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
35.
RabinovichA.MortonT. A.PostmesT.VerplankenB. (in press). Collective self and individual choice: The effects of intergroup comparative context on environmental values and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02022.x
36.
SchultzP.KhazianA. M.ZaleskiA. C. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3, 4-23. doi:10.1080/15534510701755614
37.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
38.
SchultzP. W.ZeleznyL. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
39.
SheeranP. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 1-36.
40.
SmithJ. R.LouisW. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647-666. doi:10.1348/014466607X269748
41.
SmithJ. R.LouisW. R. (2009). Group norms and the attitude-behaviour relationship. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 19-35. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00161.x
42.
SolomonS.QinD.ManningM.ChenZ.MarquisM.AverytK. B.. . . MillerH. L. (Eds.). (2007). Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
TangneyJ. P. (2002). Self-conscious emotions: The self as a moral guide. In WoodJ. V. (Ed.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 97-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145
45.
WellenJ. M.HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (1998). Group norms and attitude-behaviour consistency: The role of group salience and mood. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 48-56. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.2.1.48
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
